• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poll: SO RYZEN: WHICH ONE DID YOU BUY OR ARE GONNA BUY?

Which Ryzen did you buy or are planning to buy?

  • 1700

    Votes: 142 41.0%
  • 1700X

    Votes: 92 26.6%
  • 1800X

    Votes: 112 32.4%

  • Total voters
    346
I've found the AMD mounting bracket for my Fractal Kelvin S36. That conveniently frees up £100 for the 1800X, assuming the Crosshair does indeed work with AM3+ mounts..
 
I've found the AMD mounting bracket for my Fractal Kelvin S36. That conveniently frees up £100 for the 1800X, assuming the Crosshair does indeed work with AM3+ mounts..
It has two sets of holes in the mobo, that's one of the reasons I went for the Crosshair as getting a cooler with the bracket will be a pain.
 
Hoping the 1700 will be good but waiting for reviews and want to know what the 'x' gives you if they all have XFR as suggested. Maybe the 1700x & 1800x has access to the per core overclocking that has been leaked?
 
Did u guys ever try per core oc on Intel platform?? Very rarely does one core even do one multi higher so I would not depend on this feature assisting overall performance.

Given 8Pack must have had a play with Ryzen this might be a feature for future refreshes? As good as it sounds this first version of Ryzen will likely improve a fair bit over the next 4 years.
 
Did u guys ever try per core oc on Intel platform?? Very rarely does one core even do one multi higher so I would not depend on this feature assisting overall performance.
What's the possibility of higher clock speeds if hyperthreading was disabled due to less heat and voltage, I'm thinking gaming on 8 physical cores at higher clock speed would be much better than 4c/4t, I worked on my old i7 920 but you da man to ask
 
I think for me I can see the value in the 1700 if it is just clock speed difference and assuming you can overclock the 1700 to with 2-300MHz of the 1700x or 1800x, but I am wondering if the 'x' will give you anything extra as Gibbo said that the 1700 has XFR. Looking forward to reviews to make it all clear and give me a better idea of processor and motherboard that is best value.
 
So pulled the trigger on the following now my CC reset :D

My basket at Overclockers UK:

Total: £915.96
(includes shipping: £0.00)




Interested to see what the results will be once the NDA's lifted, Either way I don't think ill be overclocking too much so regardless of the 1700 to 1800x potentially being the same or the 1800x being a better binned process means little to me.

Currently running a Intel i7 2700k @ 4.2, GTX 1080...
I have 32GB of DDR 2400Mhz Memory already and some other bits, Figure this will keep me happy for a few years ;)

Glad to see that AMD are pushing back, been too long that Intel has free raign over their pricing... Hopefully see a flurry of cheaper processors in the near furture.
 
may i ask your reasoning?
Just thought YOLO. I don't plan to upgrade for a long time and I've been really strict with my self in the last year or two to not upgrade random stuff so thought "Treat Yo self". I went with the Hero over the K7 for a couple of reason. I really like Giga boards but the last 3 have had very laggy bios which has made tweaks annoying, setting up adaptive voltage was super complex for me compared to Asus and the m.2 drive slot on the K7/K5 is under the GPU which seems like a little bit of an oversight RE heat. I think the sensible money is still probably the 1700 but for the sake of 70£ over the next couple of years or so I thought what the hell. The board will see a CPU upgrade or two so I thought may as well go for the top tier.
 
Back
Top Bottom