Associate
When i run heaven 3.0 im getting really bad micro stutter and audio stutter at the start of the benchmark for like 10 seconds, anybody else?
I've had no problems, which drivers are you using?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
When i run heaven 3.0 im getting really bad micro stutter and audio stutter at the start of the benchmark for like 10 seconds, anybody else?
I've had no problems, which drivers are you using?
Performance is the biggest reason for buying a top-end graphics card, but there are other important factors.I can understand the lure of a shiny new toy but when there is literally ~no performance difference when overclocked I just can't see the point![]()
Anyone care to bench Crysis 2 at max settings you might need this...
http://www.overclock.net/t/991016/crysis-2-benchmark-tool-new-dx11-version
And report min fps @1200p if poss and actual GPU temps....seems people are getting 20c less temps than reviewers
Cheers
When i run heaven 3.0 im getting really bad micro stutter and audio stutter at the start of the benchmark for like 10 seconds, anybody else?
My biggest reasons for ordering one (in order of preference) were:-
i). Performance
ii). Feautures (Turbo boost, Physx, virtually free 16xAA)
iii). Size (has to fit inside a Sugo case)
iv). Power consumption (I know 25w saves very little money, but I am energy anal at the moment).
v). I prefer NVidia drivers.
vi). Because it's new and different.
My biggest reasons for ordering one (in order of preference) were:-
i). I wanted a shiny new toy
ii). See i)
![]()
Try the following:
Code:imgkeep.com imgur.com lulimg.com
Stoner81.
Are you sure there not comparing absolute GPU temps to reviewers who report temps on a delta? That's the only explanation I can come up with for such a variance. The only other thing it could is a lot reviewers use open test benches rather then enclosed cases.
I can understand the lure of a shiny new toy but when there is literally ~no performance difference when overclocked I just can't see the point![]()
3D vision and Physx in BF3 and other games is quite a large difference.
Also if you overclock a 7970 to 1.2 Ghz, but also overclock a GTX 680 to 1.3 Ghz which they are capable of from reviews, then the 680 still wins.