Solar panels and battery - any real world reccomendations?

Soldato
Joined
21 Jul 2005
Posts
20,016
Location
Officially least sunny location -Ronskistats
kW are not the same as kWh. We're talking about power here, which is measured in kW. kWh is used to measure energy - if you powered a 1kW kettle for one hour you'd have used 1kWh of energy. If you run a 2kW kettle for half an hour, you've still used 1kWh.

Not trying to be condescending or anything but I noticed in a few of your posts on this topic you've used kWh instead of kW so just wanted to nudge you in the right direction :)

Apparently overthinking. ;)

They also already make these camping ones so its cheap. I can wait an extra 180 seconds or whatever it is if it means controlling local generation. That's the whole point. :cry:
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Feb 2004
Posts
18,153
Location
Hampshire
Out of interest what sort of time when its bright summer sunshine are people hitting close to or max generation from their panels? Weather has been lovely this last week but i'm intrigued to understand what sort of sun is required (whether that is strength or height in the sky) to get your panels really going. Hopefully i'll be able to see quickly once my install is done if we get some good weather, but would be good to have an idea. In theory my panels could have seen sunlight from 5am through to 9pm yesterday bar the odd cloud.
 

SBo

SBo

Associate
Joined
1 Apr 2022
Posts
263
Location
Bucks
With batteries maybe. My setup wont have batteries. Hence why especially on normal days i.e. cloudy or non-wall to wall sunshine days you dont want to creep anywhere near the 3kw limit as you want to avoid the grid (kettle and high use items will trigger that)!

So to clarify. 3.6KW inverter for me. Limited by DNO regs. Don't assume everyone has the same setup as you. :)
Time to get a battery :) Even a small one will help smooth the load, like when your washing machine is running and a cloud passes overhead….

Did I just open a can of worms?!
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
3 May 2012
Posts
8,594
Location
Wetherspoons
The thing with the whole camping kettle, is you need to factor the cost of the kettle in.

It it costs you less than a penny to pull that little bit extra from the grid on a 3kw kettle, how many times do you have to run your lower load kettle before it saves you money?

What if the kettle only lasts say 3-4 years?
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Apr 2009
Posts
6,181
Location
UK
The thing with the whole camping kettle, is you need to factor the cost of the kettle in.

It it costs you less than a penny to pull that little bit extra from the grid on a 3kw kettle, how many times do you have to run your lower load kettle before it saves you money?

What if the kettle only lasts say 3-4 years?
Yup, exactly the point of my post. It costs 1p at the current price cap to run the 3kW kettle for 45 seconds, so if it uses only 1 second from the grid before the inverter can get the battery power in there, it's 1/45th of a pence each time that happens. Even if you ran the kettle 45 times a day for a year, that's £3.65 over the year :p not worth it.
 
Soldato
Joined
3 May 2012
Posts
8,594
Location
Wetherspoons
Aside from the kettle thing, in general, as much as I want to look after the environment, I don't think it's worth going around replacing things with more energy efficient versions until they get to the end of their natural use.

Our solar install is going on next week, so I'd like to think we are doing our bit, but honestly my main reason for getting solar is the financial investment.

Mrs has a tumble dryer thats probably 20 years old (possibly older) I dread to think how terrible the energy efficiency is on that, but it's just not cost effective to simply replace it whilst it's still working.
 
Associate
Joined
23 Jun 2022
Posts
9
Location
Kings Langley
it may draw from the grid but the amount from the grid in kwh measurement will be tiny.

Although its very short spurts typically so even a top up from the grid is going to be minor cost

Just worked it out - 3kW (not kWh) over 45 seconds (presuming people use their noggin and only boil a cup's worth) equals about 1p at the price cap rate of 28p/kWh.

All true enough but seeing Grid: 0p on the monitoring software or removing the odd red peak on those chart thingies (showing grid draw) would be very nice!
 
Associate
Joined
23 Jun 2022
Posts
9
Location
Kings Langley
Aside from the kettle thing, in general, as much as I want to look after the environment, I don't think it's worth going around replacing things with more energy efficient versions until they get to the end of their natural use.
I'm in the lucky position of moving from the South back to the North West so selling my semi down here means I can buy a detached up there, pay off the mortgage and have enough left to buy solar, air-con (for heating too) and all new appliances - fridge freezer, washer, dryer (and kettle!) all of which will be in the top brackets of energy efficiency. Being a Northerner, I am tight-fisted so I am having a great time doing my research to get the best value for money.
The existing appliances will be left for the new owner of my house as they requested so they won't be wasted.

The instant kettle thing is a bit extravagant I admit (I've had good use of my £20 Asda kettle) but pleasing she-who-must-be-obeyed means I can buy the other gear with less scrutiny.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
16,296
Location
Manchester
Out of interest what sort of time when its bright summer sunshine are people hitting close to or max generation from their panels? Weather has been lovely this last week but i'm intrigued to understand what sort of sun is required (whether that is strength or height in the sky) to get your panels really going. Hopefully i'll be able to see quickly once my install is done if we get some good weather, but would be good to have an idea. In theory my panels could have seen sunlight from 5am through to 9pm yesterday bar the odd cloud.

I don't have panels, but I'm looking into them. I used :


to get the full 2020 yearly irradiance values (satellite based, so presumably they have some algorithm that views the cloud cover from satellite photos and turns it into a defined irradiance value?)

I used the site to generate a CSV with the hourly watt production based on the size of my anticipated array, angle of panels, orientation. I could then estimate the production based on the 2020 year cloud cover (as mentioned above)

I took a couple of data points, a good and a bad day in January

p3oFGY5.png

and a good and a bad day in june

Gdym2E0.png

Could be worth plugging all your data in and seeing what it throws out?
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Dec 2012
Posts
3,262
Location
Kent, much sunnier than Scotland
Out of interest what sort of time when its bright summer sunshine are people hitting close to or max generation from their panels? Weather has been lovely this last week but i'm intrigued to understand what sort of sun is required (whether that is strength or height in the sky) to get your panels really going. Hopefully i'll be able to see quickly once my install is done if we get some good weather, but would be good to have an idea. In theory my panels could have seen sunlight from 5am through to 9pm yesterday bar the odd cloud.
Midday, but if I look at the two arrays individually they peak at slightly different times as they are at 90 degree's to each other.
 
Joined
4 Aug 2007
Posts
21,411
Location
Wilds of suffolk
kW are not the same as kWh. We're talking about power here, which is measured in kW. kWh is used to measure energy - if you powered a 1kW kettle for one hour you'd have used 1kWh of energy. If you run a 2kW kettle for half an hour, you've still used 1kWh.

Not trying to be condescending or anything but I noticed in a few of your posts on this topic you've used kWh instead of kW so just wanted to nudge you in the right direction :)

yeah I know the diff, switching between diff topics and diff things measured means I can use them interchangeably, I am sure people know what I am on about.

I will probably carry on doing that as well, so suggest you live with it ;)
 
Joined
4 Aug 2007
Posts
21,411
Location
Wilds of suffolk
The thing with the whole camping kettle, is you need to factor the cost of the kettle in.

It it costs you less than a penny to pull that little bit extra from the grid on a 3kw kettle, how many times do you have to run your lower load kettle before it saves you money?

What if the kettle only lasts say 3-4 years?

I didnt suggest we started going an replacing them, just that in future when people may have the ability to vary demand it would help if very high demand devices allowed a simple way to vary their demand

Sorry to those of you whos minds were blown by this simple suggestion ;)

Many devices if you had a variable surplus could easily heat slower, washing machine, kettle, dishwasher, tumble drier etc
It would actually be a real world usage for the fixation with making everything smart.
 
Joined
4 Aug 2007
Posts
21,411
Location
Wilds of suffolk
Mrs has a tumble dryer thats probably 20 years old (possibly older) I dread to think how terrible the energy efficiency is on that, but it's just not cost effective to simply replace it whilst it's still working.

It may well be actually.

Same applies to fridges / freezers. Modern ones use a fraction of what old ones did
Eg modern fridges they say use about a 5th of the energy of a 70s one.

Don't assume its not worthwhile switching a very old inefficient one for a modern one.
Of course it depends on annual usage vs cost, it depends on devices such as tumbles how often they are actually used. Fridges etc are easier to check since they are permanently plugged in.
 
Permabanned
Joined
24 Jul 2016
Posts
7,412
Location
South West
The thing with the whole camping kettle, is you need to factor the cost of the kettle in.

It it costs you less than a penny to pull that little bit extra from the grid on a 3kw kettle, how many times do you have to run your lower load kettle before it saves you money?

What if the kettle only lasts say 3-4 years?
I’ve had a lower power kettle for quite a while now, it’s great.

 
Soldato
Joined
3 May 2012
Posts
8,594
Location
Wetherspoons
I’ve had a lower power kettle for quite a while now, it’s great.

Oh yea, not saying it's a bad thing.

And as we are getting solar installed, as and when our kettle breaks would probably go to something like that.
 
Associate
Joined
18 Apr 2020
Posts
777
I'm looking at a lower powered way to heat my hot tub during the day as the current heater is 2kw but have started looking at seeing if I can get an outdoor pond/aquarium kind of thing as it would be significantly cheaper to heat it for a longer period using less power. need something that wont melt the shell though if it moves about and ends up in contact, and obviously won't electrocute anyone who sticks there hand in without removing the heater.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Jul 2005
Posts
20,016
Location
Officially least sunny location -Ronskistats
I didnt suggest we started going an replacing them, just that in future when people may have the ability to vary demand it would help if very high demand devices allowed a simple way to vary their demand

Sorry to those of you whos minds were blown by this simple suggestion ;)

Many devices if you had a variable surplus could easily heat slower, washing machine, kettle, dishwasher, tumble drier etc
It would actually be a real world usage for the fixation with making everything smart.

Neither did I, and totally understand most people's posts. My example was continuing on the kettle idea with something I was going to do at some point, like a poster earlier said my ASDA kettle must be over 5 years old now so whenever that decides to kick the bucket, I will likely look at a low power one. When I looked on the rainforest these were similar price to a normal kettle so not sure where people are getting rubbed up by it.

Also the pennies here, pennies there off the grid is going to amount over the year. It may be 28p in the example earlier but what when its 58p?

Its an investment and change of habits somewhat to adjust that's all. It may not have been that good a payback before, but now is one of the better moments to get it done surely.

With other installers and advise sought elsewhere, many experienced folk said the battery may work for some but its not universally epic for all. Looking at the lead times its adding on and their variety in what your investing in, I am not worried about it lets put it that way.
 
Associate
Joined
28 Mar 2004
Posts
1,980
So we are (almost, waiting on an Eddie) installed! Yesterday we spent 1p on electricity and exported enough to cover the standing charge of gas and electricity. Super happy. Installers were excellent and everything has worked first time. 4.9kw of panels, 12kwh of batteries, 5kw LUX invertor and an iboost (kindly provided to use whilst waiting on the Eddie, harvi and Hub to arrive). All for just under £9.5k
 
Back
Top Bottom