Star Trek: Section 31

Its clear they just don't want to make good stuff, Terry Matalas gave it to them on a silver platter and the powers in charge of Star Trek still let him go.

Part of me wonders if kurtzman was jealous that Matalas done what he couldn't with apparently a lot less money and the scraps left from the end of Picard season 2.
 
Its clear they just don't want to make good stuff, Terry Matalas gave it to them on a silver platter and the powers in charge of Star Trek still let him go.

Part of me wonders if kurtzman was jealous that Matalas done what he couldn't with apparently a lot less money and the scraps left from the end of Picard season 2.
I'm not...positive that's entirely the case. Look here's the thing - I'm 48, there are fans older than me and my friend, we're not going to be around making questionable purchases on memorabilia forever, and they have to cultivate a new audience, and unfortunately that new audience has probably never picked up a book and has the attention span of a springer spaniel on walkies. Getting these people to read a book, let alone science fiction is a non starter so they needed to jazz it up - and for that reason they were sold on the idea of making star trek more like star wars which was always going to be a bad idea.

Discovery...Actually had solid bones. It did, it's just unfortunate that it was boring, preachy and had no real appreciation for legacy and completely underused the few compelling protagonists that it had. Strange New Worlds? Mostly solid. I think in terms of Section 31 we're probably seeing Paramount under the skydance/Ellison flag walk back the Kurtzman/Abrams era in favour of attempting to find some degree of solvency.
 
If that was the case, they are making the same mistakes over and over again and expecting a different result.

Discovery is a good example, Netflix basically paid for the 1st series and it got massive attention for that season but they squandered the opportunity and by the end, was on a streaming service I've never heard of. Then got a leading man with charisma in Anson Mount for Strange New worlds and manage to produce something that was the definition of Okay. Then after that the Terry Matalas showed them how to make a good show.

But now we get a Section 31 with a trailer that is pure cringe, they have had opportunities to get this "new audience" and it needs to start with a good show, How many opportunities can they throw away?
 
Last edited:
IGN's take on the film.

Oof. "100 minutes of generic schlock containing only trace elements of Star Trek." Don't reckon we'll be seeing that used as the tagline, somehow...

IGN said:
If you were to scrub the tricorder sound effects from the mix, brush out an occasional Delta shield, and cut out its titular black-ops organization’s connection to Starfleet, you’d just think, gee, this chintzy Syfy movie sure knows to copy from The Hunger Games and Guardians of the Galaxy (and X-Men and The Fifth Element) but doesn’t know a damn thing about being original. Or engaging.

Though it would still be boring, Section 31 might actually be better if you come to it with no knowledge of Star Trek lore. This way, at least, you won’t end up wondering how writer Craig Sweeny and director Olatunde Osunsanmi completely bungled the entire Trek ethos – its admittedly corny core tenants of exploration, optimism, and the pursuit of righteous achievement. (There’s a reason we Star Trek dorks got bullied a lot in junior high.) Section 31 is nothing but a lousy, uninteresting caper picture with middling special effects, bad acting (yes, even Yeoh), cringeworthy dialogue, and characters you don’t care about.

IGN said:
The weirdest thing is that this little cul-du-sac in the Star Trek universe – which I predict almost no one will remember in a year – exists when Lower Decks just ended and Strange New Worlds is readying for its next season. These are two shows that understand, on a molecular level, the joy and specificity of Star Trek. The franchise is still alive.

As such, it’s best to just consider Section 31 an aberration and move on. If I’ve learned anything from Starfleet, it’s to keep positive. I’m simply dispatching a warning buoy to all other ships to avoid this area of space and warping out of here.

Question is...do I subject myself to all one hundred minutes of this in order to have my own opinion on it, or do I just 'nooope' out of the way?
 
If even IGN says it’s trash that’s a pretty big red flag.

I mean...IGN somehow thought Nemesis was worth 3/10. For this film to be down at 2/10 (and I suspect that they'd have given it one or zero without Sam Richardson trying his best with the material) is pretty telling.

Film is getting absolutely obliterated.

Yeah. Trek Core hated it, Hollywood Reporter called it subpar, Gizmodo reckoned it was mediocre as an action movie and worse as a Trek one...but hey, /Film were okay with it. That's something for the Paramount suits that greenlit it, I guess?

Can't help but think that the money spaffed on this (rumoured to be $80m, of which $20m was Yeoh's pay-or-play contract for the S31 series that morphed into the film) would have paid for a lot of better Trek. Like another couple of seasons of Lower Decks, or a Picard movie that was literally just 90 minutes of the old crew taking the Enterprise-D for a joyride and playing poker.

Yeah I'm not sure I should even try to watch this. I have enjoyed Strange New Worlds though so maybe just wait for that to come out.

Seems from a read-around like if anyone liked Discovery's early seasons then they'll like this. Which doesn't bode well for me, because I thought Discovery was hot trash right from the opening episode...
 
Last edited:
I can't recall when I stopped watching Discoballs but it was around the time that some red alien kept appearing to the crew. At that stage I was already tiring of it. When I first heard of S31 and saw that one trailer it seemed to be more of the same fast talking out of a situation (whilst something hangs in the balance) sort of film, with lots of quick cuts and action pew pew pews...which just wasn't trek to me.
 
Last edited:
Horror isn't usually my thing but I'll still watch it so I can be traumatised and have a factual opinion on the product instead of relying on reviews. I shall compare this to finding the chicken in my fridge is a week out of date and still opting to cook with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRS
I wish we had some sort of indication how bad this would be.......

Still going to watch but setting my phasers to garbage expectations.

Edit - oof!

 
Last edited:
Well, deep breaths. I'm'a goin' in.

Not doing a commentary for this one, because I doubt it'll be worth the effort of going back through to undo all my shorthand and make it readable. Just a review.

17 minutes in, Emperor Georgiou drums her fingernails on the table in her office. "Booorinnnng."

JRS nods and mutters to himself. "Yep."

*sigh*

A boilerplate action movie with the thinnest of thin veneers of Trek applied to it - some names, some sound effects, that actually rather nifty Starfleet phaser design - that left no trope untouched in the search for...what, exactly? I wasn't entertained. Thoughts weren't provoked. It showed me nothing new, nothing unexpected.

Directed by the reliably mediocre Olatunde Osunsanmi, whose 'style' is at least fitting for this kind of movie, Section 31 wanders all over the shop in tone. Seriously, we begin with a quote from the father of tragedy Aeschylus and you think hey, someone who was part of putting this together has actually read something. Maybe this will be a bit more intelligent than the trailer portrayed. But no. All it means is that someone read and watched a bunch of things...then ripped off the bits that they wanted, and shoehorned them into this 100 minute borefest. So we end up with Suicide Squad slash Guardians of the Galaxy slash Andor slash Men In Black (Fuzz, the little alien in the regular-sized golem) slash Mission: Impossible slash The Hunger Games, only it doesn't do anything as well as any of those and does a lot of things worse. All the while failing to act or look like Star Trek. I would applaud them for doing something different if that had meant doing something different to not just previous Trek projects but to other action movies as well. No such luck, this is rip-off central. Any humour to be found is stomped on by both the resolutely terrible dialogue (shades of DIS in that regard), and the small detail of having seen the protagonist murder her parents and younger sibling at the beginning making nothing afterwards seem particularly amusing. But it tries, God does it try. Mostly by having the characters insult each other, then laugh at the 'cleverness' of their insult.

Now, the action and fight sequences. Those should be up to snuff, eh? What with Michelle Yeoh still able to pull such things off even at 62. Well, maybe she could or maybe she couldn't. We'll never know, because Osunsanmi didn't really let us see. Perhaps all the camera cuts and pulls serve a purpose other than disguising a liberal use of stunt performers, but damned if I know what that might be. It certainly doesn't add anything of any artistic merit.

There's the usual non-twists that we've come to expect in nuTrek from DIS and, sadly, other nuTrek productions at this point including the de rigeur 'curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!' from Sven Ruygrok's Fuzz (in the service of Georgiou's boyfriend turned nemesis San, played by James Hiroyuki Liao) that isn't just telegraphed - it has its own Bat Signal. Along with that betrayal comes our old favourite of Bond Villain Stupidity, where somehow - despite having a weapon pointed right at her - San doesn't in fact shoot Georgiou down and instead gets into a exceedingly boring fistfight with her. Pacing is out to lunch, again a DIS hallmark. The dialogue, as mentioned, is simply awful culminating in an exchange at the 41 minute mark about the name of the weapon - is it Godsend or God's End - that had me reaching for paracetamol to shake the headache that the anger had given me. None of the cast are outstanding, though Sam Richardson does his best with the material handed to him, but a special word if I may for both the cod Oirish accent that Ruygrok puts on as Fuzz and the Benoit Blanc take-off that he does for Fuzz's wife. I simply can't describe how lousy his voice work is. And then there's Kacey Rohl as Rachel 'future captain of the Enterprise-C' Garrett. Her presence here is simply so the makers can say 'see, this is so a Star Trek film!' but really this character could have been from current day TikTok right down to the outfit and hair in the end scene. Certainly it's hard to see how this woman becomes the one we saw in TNG's "Yesterday's Enterprise". And even the stuff that nuTrek does pretty well - the VFX, music, makeup - was pretty ordinary here. Certainly nothing better than we see on the regular from TV Trek these days.

Good points...man, I'm struggling. Hooray for continuity with Quasi's chameloid eyes (see Iman's character Martia in the sixth film), the mention of ion storms regarding getting from mirror universe to prime one and the reference to Turkana IV (where Tasha Yar grew up) at the end, I guess.

I expect that there's an audience somewhere for this. But I'd be very surprised if that audience was in any way made up of Star Trek fans. May the executives at Paramount who cancelled Lower Decks and greenlit this wretched mess catch a case of diarrhoea, and then have to wipe using that Izal medicated paper that your grandparents used to buy.

*wanders off to get another mug of tea and more painkillers*
 
It wouldn't be ST on OcUK without a JRS breakdown, love it :D.

If it's in the so bad it's good territory - I could get into it more.

Edit - that Engadget review - the only two positives are the collaboration with Balenciaga for the costume design and the CGI is decent enough.............

IF5OgmkvNUPoblZy1FLFP9DZhFDlCvitLF8kv9lnZKdycvUWPGCyeYZD5v1FebjwsdIJaZtn0RKLsgDuevJ-23uFEjcOf-1kutultZsvN0A
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom