I didn't buy Young, only just found out about Jones before I stopped playing FM11 and I did actually pay the minimum release fee for De Gea but I never actually signed him because I didn't make it to the next transfer window.I always used to buy Young, Jones and De Gea anywayPrefer Hamsik or Pastore over Modric though...
Didn't he have a fantastic start to the season but went off as the season came to its conclusion? Now we've Young I can't see us needing Bale for the left wing. And if this Celtic LB is telling the truth about us wanting him then we don't need Bale for the left side at all.edit: on a serious RL-related note, I just don't get the hype over Bale at all.
I watched a few games and all he does is run, admittedly quite quickly, down the line and then cross badly if he isn't tackled by someone mildly competent?
I thought he was massively over hyped last season but in his defence had he been playing for a team with a striker that could head the ball his crosses would've produced 20+ assists with ease.
2 games v Inter and the goal v Stoke is all i remember.
Funniest thing i remember was when Bale got schooled by Neville the game after Inter![]()
arsenal to accept an offer of £37m leading to £42m for fabregas by the end of the week. you heard it here first.
And last probably too.
Meooowww
I think Denilson will step in to those boots just fine![]()
You talk as if there is a world full of the best talent easily available, Bale and Modric are top players who ANY club would struggle to replace with anything like the same quality.
Spurs have arguably played the transfer merry go round more than any club in the last 5 years, it doesn't ensure anything. You can't put a price on a settled team, that's what gets results, not signing the latest form player who most likely won't cut it.
As for City and 40mil ruining financial fair play, unless they find a way to cheat but be within the rules, they will not, in a million years qualify in 3 years, it will not happen. By the end of next season they'll have, what 30-40% higher wages than Utd, with a tiny portion of the income. Utd bring in 100mil a year from their stadium, as do Arsenal, both of them are struggling, City bring in sub 30mil IIRC, and bring in less than both the others commercially. So City only have to smash Arsenal and Utd to pieces in income to massively outspend them on wages, it will, unquestionably take "bending" the rules, or a new stadium thats comparable in capacity to Utd, and be finished in sub 3 years....... not going to happen.
Either way, 40mil wouldn't matter in the slightest.
Well we are going to be within the rules.
We will bring in a lot more these next few years through trophies, sponsorship etc so that will go up.
A new stadium? we can just add about 20k to what we have now. Don't need a brand new stadium.....
Why would it not.
So lets say a company is losing 100m a year. They have to make a profit in the next few years so they go spend 40m on eg a piece of machinery that is not better than what they have and isn't something that can generate income is a good move?
Spending 40m is another 40m you have to make? how does it not matter?
Bale wont.New players, especially big name signings will generate income through shirt sales and such.
Don't know, and we won't be worried about that little cup anyways.A. does winning the Carling Cup generate that much income?
B. 'just add 20k' is hardly a casual improvement
C. I think the 'just 40m' was in terms of the fact that you're so far up **** creek that 'only 40m more' is nothing.
Pretty sure we pay a flat fee. So they don't get more for the Champions League games etccity don't get full revenues from their stadium do they? I thought they split it 50/50 with the council/
Will go a lot towards it.So City are going to turn around a £100m+ loss (likely to be more as of last season) through increased prize money and commercial deals? Ok![]()
A. does winning the Carling Cup generate that much income?
B. 'just add 20k' is hardly a casual improvement
C. I think the 'just 40m' was in terms of the fact that you're so far up **** creek that 'only 40m more' is nothing.
Will go a lot towards it.
We are not going to be barred from playing the Champions League so this debate is pretty irrelevant.
MichelThanks for clearing that up Sepp.
http://swissramble.blogspot.com/2010/10/how-manchester-city-could-break-even.html
Is a good article as to how we can pass the rules, and that is just one man and a website.
I am sure HRH, Khaldoon and Cook have got the world's best people working on it.
No person spends the amount of money HRH has spent only to be banned from the elite competition in Europe. Especially not a person who has made billions for himself and Abu Dhabi effectively.
Michel![]()
I am sure HRH, Khaldoon and Cook have got the world's best people working on it.
No person spends the amount of money HRH has spent only to be banned from the elite competition in Europe. Especially not a person who has made billions for himself and Abu Dhabi effectively.