Soldato
- Joined
- 20 Mar 2007
- Posts
- 3,095
- Location
- Norwich
His physique is certainly impressive, I'll give him that! I wonder how many times he gets asked if he's a natty...
Once every 2 posts on bb.com People actually sign up and start posting how they have proof of where he buys his steroids or claiming to be his dealer etc. Must drive him insane.
Once every 2 posts on bb.com People actually sign up and start posting how they have proof of where he buys his steroids or claiming to be his dealer etc. Must drive him insane.
Why? What sources has he linked to that disprove the benefits of IF? Conversely, what sources has Martin Berkhan linked to that support his claims? Layne's obviously been using his techniques for years, he's probably very set in his ways and will sooner believe what he's been taught rather than new studies.
I'm still suck in the 130kgs on my squat.
Think i should start doing legs more than once a week?
He pretty much ALWAYS compares his findings to previous findings / tests.
Atleast all the articles I have read he has done.
There is no way that guy is not on roids.
I'm not meaning it like that It's just FF knows way more about the science of the body and bodybuilding than me and i need it explained to me in simple terms I'm not even trying to disprove either method just wondering why 2 very 'well established' bodybuilders have such different views. Or maybe they aren't that different and i'm missing the point slightly.
Infact as you can see in my quote, when i said 'seen some guys have good results' they were exactly the people i were meaning and are exactly why i am asking these questions
Don't worry. I'm not the type of person to take whatever my idols say as truth, completely the opposite in that i take everything anyone says with a pinch of salt (except icecold on mobility )
Haven't seen his cutting diet, link please?
I agree, that is exactly why it seems odd to me, although i really don't know much about the science of it all. Would be nice to hear FFs opinion.
Obviously he(layne) should know what he's talking about. Assuming he is actually natural, and i have no reason to believe he isn't, his conditioning etc is absolutely astounding. Not to mention a Phd in nutritional sciences iirc.
Heres the followup answer
me
layne
So he's talking about the immediate effect the protein has on the body, i assume insulin etc(i really have no idea) and multiple repetitions of this effect throughout the day being beneficial?
These are my current macros (Cals/Fat/Carbs/Protein) :
Meal totals: 2293| 91.5 | 170.2 | 197.45
This is without Dinner. And I believe Milk needs to be added in for the shakes.
EDIT: Does the above sound okay currently? going by older posts
How long's a piece of string?!
IT depends on MBR, how active you are, how active your job is, how hard you push yourself at the gym etc...
I guess with dinner that brings you up to around 2700+ maybe shy of 3000? We'll have to chat about it at the weekend.
No idea of MBR. I do a 3 day split in the gym, normally doing 3x8. My job, not THAT active, depends, some days I can sit at the desk for 8 hours other times i'll be all over the shot.
See the sticky at the top, should give you a rough idea
The idea is to go by LiE's approach, get the required amount during the day, then dinner is a plus.