Soldato
I saw it yesterday but chose to dismiss it entirely. Mostly nonsense, I think.
WCCFTech, of course it's nonsense
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I saw it yesterday but chose to dismiss it entirely. Mostly nonsense, I think.
WCCFTech, of course it's nonsense
So RedGamingTech is talking about the 7nm+ 2020 "next gen" arch then? But then if GCN has been "fixed" then there's no rush (I guess) to push the new arch out.
Personally I don't think we'll see a high-end Navi, simply because I don't think Koduri "fixed" GCN. Architectures are planned years in advance, and the timeline suggested in the RedGamigTech video doesn't line up. Koduri returned to AMD in 2013 yet Vega was supposedly finished in design so nothing could be done to tweak it. We know Vega was late, but it didn't show up until 2017. 4 years from a final design to product? Navi showed up in roadmaps in 2016 and was slated for 2018, then it got pushed to 2019 and now it's still unconfirmed if we'll see it until late this year and there's still "next Gen" on 7nm+ on the roadmap for 2020. And Koduri was put on gardening leave almost 18 months ago, and allegedly a contributing factor was being at odds with Lisa Su given his engineers were shipped over to Ryzen.
So what has he done then? I guess we'll see with Navi, but I suspect Navi will just be a 7nm exercise. It will be the first arch designed specifically for 7nm, not a shrink, and a purely gaming-focussed design. Small, lean, efficient, cheap, make your profit from high volume, low margin sales, get some steady hands at the GPU tiller and go all-in on "next gen" which has been suggested as moving away from GCN finally.
Based on the AdoredTV spec leaks, I've suggested that we could see a higher-end Navi in the form of a full-fat Navi 10, the logic being RX3070 was a full Navi 12, RX3060 a cut-down Navi 12 but only a single Navi 10 product in the RX3080 and we know there's very little chance all of the Navi 10 dies will be perfect. So there's scope for the RX3080 to be a cut-down Navi 10 with a full-fat Navi 10 available after let's say RX3090 for ease of naming, and replace Radeon VII.
In my mind it comes to this: if Navi is scalable beyond Radeon VII performance, then chances are good for a Navi 20, GCN sticks around for a while long because it was "fixed" and "next gen" is pushed back. Or Navi 20 is actually "next gen" with the extra bells and whistles like ray tracing on 7nm+. If Navi isn't scalable then it's the last hurrah for GCN, "next gen" comes along in 2020 and there never will be a high-end Navi.
ALL conjecture given we haven't even seen the small Navi cards yet.
Based on what? We literally know nothing about Navi, other than the long-standing belief that it's going to be a mid-range part that is gaming-focussed and cost-effective. Those leaked specs support that narrative. But we've seen nothing whatsoever to confirm nor dismiss those leaked specs, so to say they're "100% fabrication" is baseless, unless you have some source you'd like to share with the class?That AdoredTV 'spec' leak was complete fabrication / conjecture. 100%
Saying that a "big" Navi would be similar to smaller iterations is fine in principle, but it's assuming that Navi can scale. How scalable is GCN? Is that what Koduri "fixed", if he actually fixed anything? And you also say AMD could make as many iterations as they'd like to suit the market, again assuming Navi can scale.As I said before, any big NAVI would almost certainly be very, very similar design wise to smaller iterations. Navi is purely consumer / gaming focused. They should be able to make as many iterations as they feel suits their market. Wafers permitting ... and I'm not sure they will be very permitting at all.
Isnt Arcturus 2020, which is the non Gcn architecture card? All to compete with nvidia 7nm and Intel Arctic sound (lmao at the name) or is it Xe
It is all getting a bit boring now, for me at least. Used to love the anticipation of a new GPU coming out, especially an AMD GPU as they would almost always improve price for performance in a big way. These days we get relatively small performance bump and hardly any improvement on price for performance. Just all a bit boring.Nvidia milk the gens because they can, AMD aren't milking anything because they haven't had the resources to produce anything, i.e. they're stuck. There is a big difference. And how much more can AMD milk GCN? If Navi is even remotely close to what has been talked about, it isn't offering a new performance tier, merely shifting the goalposts on what the cheap midrange market should be in 2019. There is no way AMD can run Vega 64 + 15% performance as their principle offering for a few years, and sure as hell can't maintain Radeon VII as an actual, real product (unless we do get another crypto wave, but even then no amount of Radeon VII sales will ever make up for sacrificing MI50 cards).
AMD aren't going to bang out a new arch every year but I'm fairly sure that slowdown will happen after Navi. It's a stop gap arch to stabilise the GPU division and generate revenue. It can't be anything more otherwise AMD will end up too far behind Nvidia and lose the midrange segment too i.e. that superior value proposition. And then there's Intel joining the fray.
These days we get relatively small performance bump and hardly any improvement on price for performance. Just all a bit boring.
True, but as I said that's because AMD haven't had the money to push anything, and without that push from AMD Nvidia has zero incentive to release something significant. I think this is why I want the AdoredTV Navi leaks to be (more or less) true, not because of the performance (because that's nothing new) but because of the price, or the ballpark thereabouts. That'll shake things up a bit I reckon.
RTX 2070-esque raster performance for $250-ish? Nvidia would either have the slash prices of RTX (doubtful), really push devs to utilise RTX tech (to actually make RTX appealing and therefore worth the premium), produce a Turing GTX that performs at RTX 2070 levels (which would be hilarious), accelerate their 7nm plans, or any combination of the above.
Of course this won't happen, but it's nice to dream. But in any event, the excitement in the GPU sector that you miss hinges on AMD getting a decent R&D budget and producing something different (and that surely is post-GCN). Don't expect Intel to get involved in the fray in any meaningful way until their 2nd iteration of product.
AdoredTVs lineup doesn't make sense from a product portfolio perspective. So Navi replaces Vega and 500 series cards right? Yet the top tier of cards is going to be $250 or £250. So are we to believe AMD won't have any GPU between a £250 '3080' and a £650 Radeon 7? Nothing in the Vega price range? I just can't see that happening, even if it is a Ryzen type strategy, you'd think the cheapest would be at least £350 if it does Vega 64 +15%. Really AMD need a Navi that can compete with the 2080 because Radeon 7 probably won't have the parts to last very long.