AMD RDNA2 – Support for Raytracing & Variable Rate Shading
https://wccftech.com/amd-rdna2-support-for-raytracing-variable-rate-shading/
https://wccftech.com/amd-rdna2-support-for-raytracing-variable-rate-shading/
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Hard to get excited by AMD GPUs, these days.
I'm sure the RDNA2 cards will be OK, but they'll be priced something ludicrous, as tho they were the only game in town.
The prices just kill any hope I have for buying anything AMD, except maybe 3 years after release when they drop to more appropriate levels for what they are. Which is OK/competent cards, nothing special, and years behind the competition.
I still hope there is some space for innovation with regards to the Raytracing performance. nvidia's RTX cards proved to be not quite where they have to be.
But yeah, with a mid-range sized Navi 10 only 250 mm^2 things won't happen for them. They don't invest enough resources for the development of several chips at the same time.
They invest too much in Zen development, and even there their notebook business lacks attention.
They are lucky that Zen just works. And that intel's N10 process doesn't.
Exclusive: The AMD Inside Story, Navi GPU Roadmap And The Cost Of Zen To Gamers
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/t...admap-and-the-cost-of-zen-to-gamers.18822671/
it'll start to trickle down into the GPU side and progress will be made.
If AMD weren't focussing TSMC's output on EPYC, and therefore maximising their revenues, we'd have a 2080 beater right now.We look forward to some cracking AMD cards then.....in 5 years!!!
we'd have a 2080 beater right now.
Not sure why you find that funny, tbh.AHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHA now i've heard it all!!!!
Couldn't give a fudge about £400+ cards.2070 Super (average) 7% superior to 5700 XT, costs (minimum) 35% more.
2070 (average) 10% inferior to 5700 XT, costs 10% more.
"Won't buy AMD, priced ludicrous, years behind competition"
Computex announcement
Couldn't give a fudge about £400+ cards.
I recently bought a £250 Vega 56 which was at the very top of my budget.
Before that the 480 for £200.
In that price space AMD have done naff all of any note.
I know how this forum is. People will defend AMD to the hilt and I personally don't have time to waste when some people will never, ever accept any criticism of AMD and their products.Lucky then the 5700XT can be had for around £350 and so nowhere near £400+ and your missing the point really. And they have just dropped the 5500XT which trades blows with the 1660 super for the £170 ish price point compared to £200 for the super. So yeah room for a 5600XT if needed at the £250 mark and is likely to turn up around Jan from all accounts and would likely sit just below the 2060 in performance based on the other cards. I would say AMD are doing okay.
So I would say that to suggest they are not competing and not offering at different price levels at least now is not correct.
Modern cards are rubbish value. From both teams.
Couldn't give a fudge about £400+ cards.
I recently bought a £250 Vega 56 which was at the very top of my budget.
Before that the 480 for £200.
In that price space AMD have done naff all of any note.
But what they give you for that money hasn't really changed in how many years now?There's not many that have £400 upwards, for a graphics card. In OCUK, we're a VERY small bubble, on top of a gaming bubble of users. 1080p gaming is where most gamers are and AMD have that area well oiled.
Ah well, therein lies the trick (potentially).don't forget they'll be fighting Ampere by then and not Turing.
Where one can make a positive for X example, it's possible to produce an example of a positive for Y.