Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,800
The card is very stylish.
/said in a Borat voice
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The card is very stylish.
RTX 2070 Coming Back
Our board partner contacts have told us that they’ve ordered more RTX 2070 GPU dies, and that NVIDIA is reviving the previously-retired 2070 line because AMD RX 5700 XT sales are outpacing 2060 Super sales. NVIDIA had originally told us (on record) that the RTX 2070 would be replaced with the 2060 Super and 2070 Super, but the company looks to be prolonging the life of its 2070 to better compete with AMD.
Or how about just slash £100 off the 2070 Super then, Nvidia?
Clearly it's not flying enough though, is it.Because it flies for them
Clearly it's not flying enough though, is it.
Dropping the 2070 Super to be in line with the 5700 XT completely eliminates any reason to buy AMD. And if Nvidia are losing 2060 Super sales to the 5700 XT then that's clearly a problem with their pricing. 2060 Super is not in the same league as the XT, so why should it be priced anywhere near?
2070 Founders was beaten by the 5700 XT. That Palit card is not a Founders, yet costs the same as the reference XT? So you're paying the same money for inferior performance. Well, that clearly doesn't work for 2060 Super sales, so why would it work for a resurrected 2070? The 2070 is dead-on-resurrection if anybody had half a brain.
Are TU104 yields really that bad? Are TU104 yields good enough to not chop down for a 2060 Super and server a 2070 instead?Well it is because the GPU is in shortage, board partners are always running low on stocks, so the supply is still not 100% keeping with the full demand
Are TU104 yields really that bad? Are TU104 yields good enough to not chop down for a 2060 Super and server a 2070 instead?
Are TU104 yields really that bad? Are TU104 yields good enough to not chop down for a 2060 Super and server a 2070 instead?
So if the 2070 Super is indeed so popular Nvidia can't make enough, dedicate the fab capacity to increase TU104 production, not bang out more TU106s that nobody is buying.it is not a yields issue but demand. Despite all the fake news Turing is really selling well and helping Nvidia realize massive profits last quarter.
Clearly it's not flying enough though, is it.
Dropping the 2070 Super to be in line with the 5700 XT completely eliminates any reason to buy AMD. And if Nvidia are losing 2060 Super sales to the 5700 XT then that's clearly a problem with their pricing. 2060 Super is not in the same league as the XT, so why should it be priced anywhere near?
2070 Founders was beaten by the 5700 XT. That Palit card is not a Founders, yet costs the same as the reference XT? So you're paying the same money for inferior performance. Well, that clearly doesn't work for 2060 Super sales, so why would it work for a resurrected 2070? The 2070 is dead-on-resurrection if anybody had half a brain.
What you haven't taken into account is that the 5700xt doesn't offer ray-tracing where as the 2060 super does.
What you haven't taken into account is that the 5700xt doesn't offer ray-tracing where as the 2060 super does.
So if the 2070 Super is indeed so popular Nvidia can't make enough, dedicate the fab capacity to increase TU104 production, not bang out more TU106s that nobody is buying.
Sorry, don't buy it. You don't tackle shortages of a popular product by diverting manufacturing capacity to something nobody wants.