• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** The AMD RDNA 4 Rumour Mill ***

Did the same benchmark with my 7900xtx and 7600x and got 201fps with a score of 34354, interesting


Regardless of what we think of that Daniel Owen dude, he also found out the settings and benchmarked it with a better CPU (9800X3D) and same GPU.
His score was 35691 and 209.53 fps.

So yeah, performance in line with other leaks, the 9070XT looks to be roughly a 7900XTX. All it needs is a good price.
Would be interesting to see how the non-XT compares, but we'll have to wait a few weeks for proper reviews & benchmarks I reckon.
 
Using the settings in that vid:

7800XT MBA card no driver tweaks.
Core Ultra 285k (Intel baseline profile) and with no info on ram speeds and timings in the Chinese leak, I used a 6400 XMP profile which is what reviewers were given as baseline testing for Core Ultra CPU's.
Win11 24H2 Intel PR5 fixes and bios updates in place.

Now comparing this to the original Chinese leak on X and using a 7800XT to compare with (at the supposed same settings) , looks like the 9070XT is a little monster considering the amount of shaders it actually has.

All boils down to street prices now, not imaginary MSRP's.

8oKURv9.jpg
 
Last edited:

Regardless of what we think of that Daniel Owen dude, he also found out the settings and benchmarked it with a better CPU (9800X3D) and same GPU.
His score was 35691 and 209.53 fps.

So yeah, performance in line with other leaks, the 9070XT looks to be roughly a 7900XTX. All it needs is a good price.
Would be interesting to see how the non-XT compares, but we'll have to wait a few weeks for proper reviews & benchmarks I reckon.
This is likely a higher clocked model. We about know at what performance will be, lots of coorberrating leaks at this point: somewhere between 4080 and 7900 xtx om the high end models.

Pricing. Pricing. Pricing. ....followed by availability. If they pull the s&%£show nV did with 5-series on supply, it's game over
 
This is likely a higher clocked model. We about know at what performance will be, lots of coorberrating leaks at this point: somewhere between 4080 and 7900 xtx om the high end models.

Pricing. Pricing. Pricing. ....followed by availability. If they pull the s&%£show nV did with 5-series on supply, it's game over
I guess this would be roughly where we might expect the 5070Ti to fall too. Which would at least mean AMD got the naming right. Should also be a good indicator to them and it's what the pricing should be.
 
All about pricing and availability, like was said above, if they they pull a manufactured shortage of supply to artificially raise prices it will be DOA, likewise, no point pricing it like current 7900xtx prices if it performs similar.
 
Last edited:
This is likely a higher clocked model. We about know at what performance will be, lots of coorberrating leaks at this point: somewhere between 4080 and 7900 xtx om the high end models.

Pricing. Pricing. Pricing. ....followed by availability. If they pull the s&%£show nV did with 5-series on supply, it's game over

If it actually can match the 7900XTX in half of the games I play and is priced around £600 then I think it's time to upgade from the old 3080FE. If the prices is the same or £50 cheaper than a 5070Ti then I'll wait for next gen. I have a price limit which I will not go over.
 
Last edited:
If 9070xt is so efficient why did amd not make a 5080 killer

Big missed opportunity; unless the 9070xt is expensive to make for amd, that's probably the issue I guess, its not that AMD can't compete with Nvidia at the high end, it's that AMD's architecture makes high end too expensive to manufacture
 
Last edited:
I guess this would be roughly where we might expect the 5070Ti to fall too. Which would at least mean AMD got the naming right. Should also be a good indicator to them and it's what the pricing should be.
I don't think the 5070ti will be that performant, the 5080 is roughly between the 4080 and 7900xtx in raster.
 
If 9070xt is so efficient why did amd not make a 5080 killer
I don't think anyone was expecting the 5080 to be quite such a wet fish, so AMD likely weren't anticipating that their previous gen XTX was only a few % of performance off for raster for the 5080.
 
If 9070xt is so efficient why did amd not make a 5080 killer

Big missed opportunity; unless the 9070xt is expensive to make for amd, that's probably the issue I guess, its not that AMD can't compete with Nvidia at the high end, it's that AMD's architecture makes high end too expensive to manufacture
Wasn't it something similar with the 5700 release in that it was an amazing little card compared to the competition but they had nothing in the stacks above it.

The hopium I'm having is that they have seen the **** up by Nvidia (if ever there was a time to take back market share it's surely on potentially the worst Nvidia launch of all time), delayed everything, and will now try and release something like a 32gig 9080xt for like 1k which will compete with 5080/4090, pure hope on my part for something reasonable to save the GPU market.
 
Last edited:
From some leaks I've read, Its approximately 7.5% faster than the 4070Ti.

I'm expecting it to be a bit more than that generally/across the board.

From the specs, I think it might end up quite close to 4080 performance.
 
you are right its looking like a little efficiency beast

If 9070xt is so efficient why did amd not make a 5080 killer

Big missed opportunity; unless the 9070xt is expensive to make for amd, that's probably the issue I guess, its not that AMD can't compete with Nvidia at the high end, it's that AMD's architecture makes high end too expensive to manufacture
Is it efficient, where are we getting that from?

I don't think the 5070ti will be that performant, the 5080 is roughly between the 4080 and 7900xtx in raster.
But these days, based on a lot of comments in this thread, you also have to consider RT performance too. That's constantly mentioned, along with FSR4, as a big selling point and value add over the 7000 series. If we're not then this looks similar to the 7900xtx with 8GB less VRAM.
 
If 9070xt is so efficient why did amd not make a 5080 killer

Big missed opportunity; unless the 9070xt is expensive to make for amd, that's probably the issue I guess, its not that AMD can't compete with Nvidia at the high end, it's that AMD's architecture makes high end too expensive to manufacture

Maybe the models with the huge coolers and three 8 pin power connectors are the factory overclocked models?
 
There is probably no better time than right now for AMD to really bend Nvidia over, proper Mic Drop moment.

But we all know AMD often fail this close to the finish line.

Honestly right now is perfect if the leaks on performance are true.

AMD know Nvidia have been able to artificially inflate the GPU market prices for a while now and have somewhat profited from this, but they still have extremely low mindshare like they did in the CPU space and look how that turned around.

They could effectively reset GPU pricing and actually make a ton of money if they were smart.

looks like inventory has been stockpiling for a few months while it appears Nvidia paper launched, so hopefully day 1 stock should be decent and prices should be great as long as and thus us key, AMD do something remarkable and sensible.

Drop the 9070XT at no more than £550 if it indeed does have performance around the 7900xt -7900xtx mark.

9070 around £450.

Pricing anywhere near the Nvidia 4xxx cards let alone the 5xxx cards would be suicidal for them as people will still just buy Nvidia.

They would essentially render the 5070/xx models irrelevant, or Nvidia would have to massively reprice their entire stack to not look like the money grubbing scum they already are.

I honestly feel Nvidia have disdain for the GPU market and it’s understandable given it’s now one of their smallest revenue streams compared to AI / Datacentre.

Same could be said about AMD but I feel they can see there is an opportunity for them to really chew into the GPU market like they did in CPU vs Intel.

This should really be their Ryzen moment in GPU but we all know how they live to fumble.
 
It's slightly faster than xtx and 4080 super in raster

Allegedly. We need to see some games reviews but it should not be far off that.

There is probably no better time than right now for AMD to really bend Nvidia over, proper Mic Drop moment.

But we all know AMD often fail this close to the finish line.
...
Pricing anywhere near the Nvidia 4xxx cards let alone the 5xxx cards would be suicidal for them as people will still just buy Nvidia.

They would essentially render the 5070/xx models irrelevant, or Nvidia would have to massively reprice their entire stack to not look like the money grubbing scum they already are.

I honestly feel Nvidia have disdain for the GPU market and it’s understandable given it’s now one of their smallest revenue streams compared to AI / Datacentre.

Same could be said about AMD but I feel they can see there is an opportunity for them to really chew into the GPU market like they did in CPU vs Intel.

This should really be their Ryzen moment in GPU but we all know how they live to fumble.

This is what Jack said in interviews months ago. So the objective seems to be there but will they stick to that?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom