Soldato
I'll ask a simple question that only needs a simple answer,
Has widespread gun ownership made the US a better country?
You tell us since you know a lot about the US and have lived there.
A simple answer will do.
I'll ask a simple question that only needs a simple answer,
Has widespread gun ownership made the US a better country?
But I thought making guns illegal stopped their use by criminals?!??!OneThere was 9,700 crimes involving firearms taking place in the UK in 2020.
The cops seized about 500. Where are the rest?
But I thought making guns illegal stopped their use by criminals?!??!One
People forget that the USA borders one of the most violent countries in the world as well.I thought that to.
Now the police count CS spray as a gun.
Better start taking hairspray around
I'll ask a simple question that only needs a simple answer,
Has widespread gun ownership made the US a better country?
People forget that the USA borders one of the most violent countries in the world as well.
The audacity of someone in America mocking British firearms legislation is almost too much. It does explain a lot though.
All you need to know is that the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.
In all seriousness though no, its a complete mess over there. Its also really really sad that so many americans think they are John Wayne and when someone comes into their home with a gun they will turn into rambo. Its like keyboard warriors in real life. That fat sack of **** feels like a bad ass because he has a small army worth of guns in his house.
I'll ask a simple question that only needs a simple answer,
Has widespread gun ownership made the US a better country?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulhs...-violence-should-include-how-guns-save-lives/All you need to know is that the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.
In all seriousness though no, its a complete mess over there. Its also really really sad that so many americans think they are John Wayne and when someone comes into their home with a gun they will turn into rambo. Its like keyboard warriors in real life. That fat sack of **** feels like a bad ass because he has a small army worth of guns in his house.
So you would prefer the UK way?
If someone shots at you or comes at you to take your head off. you use "Self Defence Protection Spray which is UK legal, not toxic and uses NO dangerous chemicals." is the best way to go
That's going to stop the robber in there tracks
No the UK way is that almost no one comes at you with a gun because almost no one has one. The chances of someone in the UK ever seeing a gun outside of a legal firearm is tiny.
If someone came at me with a gun I would just do what they told me to do. Even if I had a gun on me, if someone was pointing a gun at me I wouldn't go for mine because they would find it very easy to shoot me before I got it. Americans don't seem to be able to fathom the idea that very very very very few people in the UK have any fear of guns or being shot unless they are a serious criminal.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulhs...-violence-should-include-how-guns-save-lives/
Research would suggest your opinions are wrong.
Are you trying to tell me that in a country with ~400m guns and where there is a high chance anyone committing a crime could have a gun that "good guys" with guns actually stop some of those. Well colour me shocked!
If only the "bad guys" had guns of course there would be far greater damage done by them.
Thats not really the discussion though is it. What is safer, a population without guns in everyones hands or a population with guns in everyones hands.
The US homicide rate is 4.96/100k and the UK is 1.2/100k. Considering killing someone is quite easy if you really want to, what is causing the US to have 4x the homicide rate of the UK. Could it possibly be something to do with the easy availability of guns.
Between 1980 and 2008, blacks were
disproportionately represented as both homicide
victims and offenders (Cooper and Smith, 2011).
The homicide victimization rate for blacks (27.8
per 100,000) was six times higher than the rate
for whites (4.5 per 100,000) (figure 1). Blacks
accounted for slightly more than 51 percent of
all gun homicide victims between 1980 and 2008,
despite representing only about 13 percent of the
U.S. population. The homicide offending rate for blacks (34.4 per 100,000) was almost eight times
higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000)
(figure 2).
The vast majority of homicides are intra-
racial, with 84 percent of white victims killed by
whites and 93 percent of black victims killed by
blacks (figure 3). Black males between the ages
of 18 and 24 are dramatically overrepresented in
homicide. Homicides of young black males in this
age category peaked at 195.9 victimizations per
100,000 in 1993 and subsequently declined to 91.1
victimizations per 100,000 in 2008. Homicides by
young adult black males peaked at 365 offenders
per 100,000 in 1993 and subsequently declined to
175.8 offenders per 100,000 in 2008.
Exactly. I've never even heard a gunshot outside of a range or farm.
You can legaly own guns in the UK (bar handguns or automatics), but there isn't a national obsession with them like in the US. No one cares about owning one.
Someone waving a gun around on the street is most likely going to get shot, it's an easy decision for the police.
Imagine certain types of crime weren't a thing, for example if certain ethnic groups had the same homicide rates as the white majority or Hispanic minority in the US the homicide rate would likely half or be lower putting the UK / US homicide rate at more comparable ratios.
Can you imagine 13% of the population literally killing ya'll to death?
So you said that if you take out the minority groups their crime rate would be similar to ours and yet that says that its 4.5/100k amoung whites and 27.8/100k amoung blacks. Which is completely contradiction your first point....
Can you imagine if no one had easy access to a weapon that you could just point at someone in anger and kill them. Can you imagine if the police didn't have the idea that anyone they stop for a crime is quite likely to have a gun on them and didn't have an itchy trigger finger as a result.
Or one that doesn't allow easy loopholes like "oh it's got a slightly different stock" or "it's not prohibited because it's got an 8 round magazine rather than a 9 round one", or "we'll change the grip to avoid the new law" as the manufacturer changes one small aspect of it to avoid a ban and then carries on selling what is effectively the same model but with a cosmetic difference.That's the worst firearms act in the world...Or the laziest.
Thats not what I said, i said that if all minority groups in the US had similar rates to white/hispanic groups then the ratios would be more comparable .
As it is you have one group who far exceed the number and increase the ratio so significantly that it completely skews the numbers to an extent where it looks like the US has a huge gun problem.
It does have a gun problem but only due to a minority not the majority who seem to be able to control those twitchy trigger fingers pretty well.