lol you got that lot from my quotes from yesterday when i tweeted him
Actually i got it from Rage3d. Then i clicked their link and it took me to his twitter.
This is going to be fun.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
***THE BF4 BENCHMARKS THREAD***
- Thread starter pgi947
- Start date
Actually i got it from Rage3d. Then i clicked their link and it took me to his twitter.
This is going to be fun.
Yea im not even going to TRY and tell this guy that HT helps in BF4. As if i7s arent better in BF4 than i5s lol. Its the same as trying to tell people that Ref 7970s are better than custom PCBs for several reasons. 99% of people are too naive and delusional to understand.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Nov 2012
- Posts
- 17,955
- Location
- Close to Swindon, but not Swindon
It's a no-brainier whether HT is used actively or not!
LOL come on you aren't serious right?
Oh duuuude lol i dont even.... I didnt even realize you said that on purpose to cause ruckus!
My vram limited 670 results,
2013-10-09 16:37:33 - bf4
Frames: 15903 - Time: 278915ms - Avg: 57.017 - Min: 33 - Max: 65
All ultra except for msaa which is off. I am on 1920 x 1200 res.
vram usage was 1901.
Seems like a 2gb card is fine for bf4.
2013-10-09 16:37:33 - bf4
Frames: 15903 - Time: 278915ms - Avg: 57.017 - Min: 33 - Max: 65
All ultra except for msaa which is off. I am on 1920 x 1200 res.
vram usage was 1901.
Seems like a 2gb card is fine for bf4.
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 16,097
- Location
- London
Seems that way so far, Ian. In this map at least.
I get 1998-2137mb usage, but whether it needs that or it's just using it because it can...? That's with up to 4xAA fwiw.
Close call though
I get 1998-2137mb usage, but whether it needs that or it's just using it because it can...? That's with up to 4xAA fwiw.
Close call though
Associate
- Joined
- 5 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 403
With AA switched off yes, but not fine If you want MSAA.
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 16,097
- Location
- London
MyBrains, he's behind you 
Why would i want AA on though at 1920x1200 when it makes NO difference in image quality?
Infact it looks exactly the same ( side by side ) as my friends BF4 Beta with msaax4 on a 780 with a 1440 monitor.
MyBrains, he's behind you
HaHa yea.. i hate it when i cant point the gun at whoever is shooting at the chopper
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 16,097
- Location
- London
Each to their own I guess. I see a fair bit of difference with AA on or off at 1080p, which shouldn't be much different to 1200p.
HaHa yea.. i hate it when i cant point the gun at whoever is shooting at the chopper
Me too
Just have to hope the other gunner can shoot straight.
Looks like it is getting there, the recent patch has definitely made some improvement. 64 player conquest.
2013-10-09 17:02:07 - bf4
Frames: 34484 - Time: 600000ms - Avg: 57.473 - Min: 32 - Max: 93
Seems pretty low still, are you sure its not the I5 holding you back?
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Nov 2012
- Posts
- 17,955
- Location
- Close to Swindon, but not Swindon
It is low, but it's playable. Once they have released the full game I'll reassess the situation, I'm thinking about getting a 3770k to replace my 2500k.