Soldato
^ GTX690, still doing well. Good to see.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
***THE BF4 BENCHMARKS THREAD***
- Thread starter pgi947
- Start date
Caporegime
7970 GE to GTX 780 = 6%
7970 GE to GTX Titan = 15%
Thats a good showing
Soldato
Funny this is about the fastest CPU (in stock) for BF4:
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=CP-360-AM&groupid=701&catid=1967
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=CP-360-AM&groupid=701&catid=1967
Soldato
Great job with the graphs. Starting to regret buying the standard version now. Want to see what I can get out of it.
Last edited:
I think the in game brightness is way too low I had to max mine out and then also turn colour up on my tv.
It looks much better now and I would say far better than bf3.
Not sure why they put they beige/grey colour filter over the whole game though kind of ruins it with everything being same colour but I got used to it pretty quick.
Caporegime
I think the i7 39## want to have a word with you.
Still, the FX-83## is putting up a good showing.
Caporegime
Heavy on the cpu!!
Bring on mantle i say!
Bring on mantle i say!
Caporegime
Might be a good idea for you to ask that in a separate thread so it gets the attention it needs
Soldato
7970 GE to GTX 780 = 6%
7970 GE to GTX Titan = 15%
Thats a good showing
Aye it's a good showing. Having read a few bits and bobs everywhere it seems there's a lot more optimisation required for NVIDIA to do. The 780 should - based on the hardware - be a lot further ahead.
Caporegime
If you play on domination, 32 players no vehicles, you get much higher fps than the conquest 64 player, vehicle friendly large maps. My bench from earlier was on 32 man domination.
As i cannot use my afterburner OSD i cannot tell if the fps drops below 60 are caused by the cpu, gpu or the game itself just being a bit buggy and beta. Generally performance seems very good, but the game clearly needs more work.
I also believe the servers/net code may also be responsible for problems as well.
As i cannot use my afterburner OSD i cannot tell if the fps drops below 60 are caused by the cpu, gpu or the game itself just being a bit buggy and beta. Generally performance seems very good, but the game clearly needs more work.
I also believe the servers/net code may also be responsible for problems as well.
Last edited:
As Rusty said game still has a lot more optimization to come from nvidia, AMD performance is probably already nearing max as they will of been optimizing alongside EA in development.
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Jun 2011
- Posts
- 6,053
ok I think the beta 11's are the best for us AMD boys
much better averages and min's
2013-10-01 17:52:53 - bf4
Frames: 1413 - Time: 15179ms - Avg: 93.089 - Min: 66 - Max: 128
much better averages and min's
2013-10-01 17:52:53 - bf4
Frames: 1413 - Time: 15179ms - Avg: 93.089 - Min: 66 - Max: 128
Man of Honour
Heavy on the cpu!!
Bring on mantle i say!
I don't know why they publish graphs like this, the 3970X and 3930k clock for clock perform identically.
I am sure people can find other examples of this with some of the other CPUs too.
Maybe they should have a graph with all the CPUs overclocked to 4.5 instead.