Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2004
- Posts
- 17,071
- Location
- Shepley
Honestly think if England do it, no one bats an eyelid. It’s always a bit pantomime with the Aussies.
Yeah it was just a shock to see.I've got absolutely no problem with what Carey did and I'm really surprised that people think this is off.
Firstly Carey threw it when Bairstow was still in his crease. Secondly you can't leave your crease for obvious reasons until the ball is dead, otherwise you'll get fielding teams missing run outs for singles because they 'felt bad' upsetting Stuart Broad's feelings.
Haha I don't remember that one. Was Broad bowling and celebrating as well. Duplicity.Ah yeah, the de Grandhomme run out. That’s what I was thinking of.
I've got absolutely no problem with what Carey did and I'm really surprised that people think this is off.
Firstly Carey threw it when Bairstow was still in his crease. Secondly you can't leave your crease for obvious reasons until the ball is dead, otherwise you'll get fielding teams missing run outs for singles because they 'felt bad' upsetting Stuart Broad's feelings.
There are members in the Long Room so enraged that they've reverted from a Windsor knot into a much more aggressive half Windsor.
The wording of the rules is that the ball is dead when it is finally settled in the wicket keepers gloves.What? Whats it got to do with when he threw it? Why was he throwing it other than to get a run out. If a routine ball goes through to the wicket keeper and you haven't tried to play it down the wicket it is considered dead. The batsman doesn't give it a second thought. Next ball.
Your argument sounds like McGraths argument about the dropped catch yesterday. Hyperbole and weird false equivalence. There is a huge difference you are ignoring. If you run then you are active. You are trying to score runs and the ball is still in play. No one has ever contested a run out on the grounds of "I ran but I thought the ball was dead. Why was he trying to get me out".
What point is the ball dead btw? Can it go to another fielder from the wicket keeper who then stumps you? Is that cool?
There is a reason the vast majority of people think its scummy...
Its awful sportsmanship but its the Aussies so they won't care. That has probably won them the match.
That says a lotEven if we lose, that Bairstow dismissal will give me a deep warm glow for months to come.
To Alex Carey: "That's all you'll ever be remembered for that."
To Pat Cummins: "That's the worst thing I've ever seen in cricket."
De Grandhomme had started running.@fez what’s the difference between the Bairstow run out and the de Grandhomme one?
Carey threw it in case he had a stumping chance, like any other stumping. Turns out he did.What? Whats it got to do with when he threw it? Why was he throwing it other than to get a run out. If a routine ball goes through to the wicket keeper and you haven't tried to play it down the wicket it is considered dead. The batsman doesn't give it a second thought. Next ball.
Your argument sounds like McGraths argument about the dropped catch yesterday. Hyperbole and weird false equivalence. There is a huge difference you are ignoring. If you run then you are active. You are trying to score runs and the ball is still in play. No one has ever contested a run out on the grounds of "I ran but I thought the ball was dead. Why was he trying to get me out".
What point is the ball dead btw? Can it go to another fielder from the wicket keeper who then stumps you? Is that cool?
There is a reason the vast majority of people think its scummy...
Its awful sportsmanship but its the Aussies so they won't care. That has probably won them the match.
He’d basically overbalanced after the LBW shout and had no idea where the ball was, I think you’re seeing what you’re wanting to see.De Grandhomme had started running.
BBC site has some of what the wicket mic picked up from Broad: