Poll: The EU Referendum: How Will You Vote? (March Poll)

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

  • Remain a member of the European Union

    Votes: 400 43.3%
  • Leave the European Union

    Votes: 523 56.7%

  • Total voters
    923
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Presume that by 'yes' you mean vote to Leave the EU. The answer to your question is that no-one knows for sure. Whether or not we can retire to Spain will be up to Spain, but since a large portion of their economy is based on being a retirement destination then I'm going to say that yes we probably will be able to in future. Whether or not British pensioners will still receive the British pension in Spain will be up to the British government, I don't see any reason why they wouldn't pay it to UK nationals living abroad.

Yes you still will but it will be points based system depending on how much cash you have you will NO LONGER have the right to live there.

Unless the UK sign up to the EEA and freedom of movement of people in the EEA as they do at present (btw just in case you don't know the EEA IS NOT THE EU)

Oh and you might have to find houses for some on the lower income Ex-pats who currently live there but may find they no longer have the points (money) to stay :) still that's what the majority want isn't it! Isn't it?
 
Yes you still will but it will be points based system depending on how much cash you have you will NO LONGER have the right to live there.

Unless the UK sign up to the EEA and freedom of movement of people in the EEA as they do at present (btw just in case you don't know the EEA IS NOT THE EU)

Oh and you might have to find houses for some on the lower income Ex-pats who currently live there but may find they no longer have the points (money) to stay :) still that's what the majority want isn't it! Isn't it?

The immigration system following a Brexit is still TBD - it's true I favour a points-based system at the moment however no-one has said the EU would reciprocate that, or indeed that such a system would be in the UK's negotiation wish list. You realise however that British retirees who go abroad generally have a lot of money and don't join the workforce so are pretty much welcomed around the world - even the USA makes it easy to retire to Florida.

I think it'd be pretty crummy of the EU to start forcibly evicting and deporting UK citizens who are already living in the EU. While we in the UK could retaliate and do the same for EU citizens living in the UK who don't meet the new criteria, I'd hope we wouldn't because of the UK's tradition of fairness and human rights.
 
Wait what? You know what post-Brexit immigration regime Spain would use for British people who want to retire there? And are you referring to people currently there, or new people, or both?

Who cares? They aren't going to say no to money. It much like the talk by the remain people that think everything is going to be slapped with large tariffs and we will cease to trade with Europe. We know a lot about getting trade deals and the US has proven that deals are easily achievable. The US not just with Europe but also in Asia create many tariff free trade deals. It is a mutual agreement. Germany definitely would not want tariffs on their cars coming to the UK so there are many opportunities to use to make it tariff free. Free movement of people will end unless you are highly skilled which is the case if you want to go to any other country in the world. Free trade will happen. UK will avoid losing its sovereign rights to Brussels. Brexit will be a great opportunity for the UK as they can actually start to help the economy rather than watching it erode way by the EU. The EU stifles innovation and prevents countries stepping in to help industries (like the recent Redcar steel plant, blame the EU as we had to watch it sink).
 
Is it just me or does the stay campaign really struggle with good reasons to vote in?

Status-quo campaigns are generally uninspiring. Politicians like to campaign on change, because only change has the potential to radically improve peoples lives.

Change campaigns oversell the possible benefits, whilst underplaying the possible risks. The opposite is also true. However, the later is always going to be seen as more negative that the former.
 
Last edited:
If pointing out the idiotic flaws in the leave claims is negative, then okay. If remain are negative, leave are just being fantasists/lying/concealing the truth. Eg. claiming that we'll magically just be able to trade as we want to with the EU, without having to accept free movement... when I haven't heard a compelling argument why that's realistic (just frothing at the mouth and shouting how our economy is huge so obviously we'll get what we want doesn't count).

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/mar/26/nhs-under-threat-from-brexit

That is just one example of scaremongering, it isn't hard to find others from the stay campaign.
 
Why's it unreasonable to say there are risks attached to leaving? If it's not true/misrepresents evidence, why don't the leave side shoot them down with evidence rather than brushing it all off as scaremongering?

All leave seem to have are empty words about getting control back, which then can't stand up to scrutiny... then shouting about scaremongering. Rather than attacking things people in favour of remain say, why not show us the positive, evidence based information from the leave side?

Yet this list, which is factual has been branded as scaremongering.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics...t-of-serious-crimes-by-eu-citizens-in-britain
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom