Geography? I'm sure Canada would join if we asked nicely.![]()
The continent doesn't appear to be a barrier. Also possible net contributing European candidates are Iceland, Norway and Switzerland.
Geography? I'm sure Canada would join if we asked nicely.![]()
[TW]Fox;29541023 said:The key point here is that nobody actually knows what the economy will look like post exit. It's entirely uncertain.
And it's this uncertainty which drives devaluation of currency and the scaling back of business investment, which then drives some of the claims we've had about more expensive holidays and a slight GDP reduction.
How anyone can agree we don't know what it'll look like but then at the same time argue that this uncertainty won't cause the above is beyond me.
[TFU] Thegoon84;29541215 said:I don't get this.... Sorry but what Paul was implying was true!
I'd like to vote out, but the thought of an untethered tory government scares the absolute living **** out of me. People like Gove, Boris, Hunt.... No way!
So like Paul, I too am back on the fence!
Using your impeccable logic, then we should also discount anything from EU funded groups, as they are also biased.
They're not part of the EU, but both Norway and Switzerland contribute already
[TFU] Thegoon84;29541215 said:I don't get this.... Sorry but what Paul was implying was true!
I'd like to vote out, but the thought of an untethered tory government scares the absolute living **** out of me. People like Gove, Boris, Hunt.... No way!
So like Paul, I too am back on the fence!
Does that mean that we have to discount anything that Nigel Farage MEP says as he is also EU funded by virtue of being paid a salary by the European Parliament.
Does that mean that we have to discount anything that Nigel Farage MEP says as he is also EU funded by virtue of being paid a salary by the European Parliament?
[TW]Fox;29541000 said:I wouldn't believe anything from the Non-EU funded groups. They are biased against the EU!
There, now we can just discount everything ever published ever and just keep arguing about it. Sorted.
Because it's loads more constructive to criticise the source rather than the information itself.
“Proper identification of taxpayers is essential to effective exchange of information between tax administrations. The creation of European Taxpayer Identification Number (EU TIN) would provide the best means for this identification. It would allow any third party to quickly, easily and correctly identify and record TINs in cross-border relations and serve as a basis for effective automatic exchange of information between member states tax administrations.”
What the heck ?
What's next ?
Tattooing or MicroChipping us ?
http://order-order.com/2016/05/25/eu-plots-europe-wide-tax-id-numbers/
Bloody Revelations coming true ?
The IFS have published their report into the impact of Brexit on UK finances, concluding that Brexit would lead to damage to the UK finances that would be equivalent to a requirement for two more years of austerity.
Vote.Leave has predictably accused the IFS of being EU stooges but even the director of Economists for Brexit has come out saying that the IFS are a respected, independent, body and this accusation is utter nonsense.
It's just taking national insurance numbers and putting them on a standardised database?
The BBC are supposed to be impartial. Biggest joke ever.
Why do we need a standardised database across the EU?
Why do we need a standardised database across the EU?