Engines will be pointing backwards to the direction of travel if they're decelerating. Is that what you mean?
Or just recast the part... I’m sure there must be several middle aged Indian (Asian) actors in America or Canada they could have picked. What makes it even more irksome is the claim by the show producers I read on an entertainment site (can’t find the link but Google Expanse S5 TV vs book) is that this was an intended plot mechanic to add drama and pathos to the story, even to the point of stating Alex actually died the way Fred Johnson did in the book. Total bull muck!
Yep agree with that, and I don't think helped by most of the ships having slightly obscure names that they blurt out so quickly I find it hard to register which is which
I don't know whether it was just me being tired today when watching this but I had hardly a clue what was going on. Maybe I'll watch again another day.
Also is it just me but when seeing a panning shot of spaceships it feels like the ships are going one way but then the engines should be on back but it feels like they're going forward with the engine at front too. Is it the camera panning that's confusing me. 45th minute in final episode has a scene like it. I can't describe how I see it in words.
I watch with the subtitles on because of this and the belter accents! Still can’t follow where the missiles hit in the battle in the last ep. It was quite poorly directed.
Yes it is very well done. Directional/Steering thrust (according to the books) is actually provided via superheated steam jets, referred to colloquially as "The Kettle", was wondering if a similar system was employed on current or past real spacecraft such as Apollo and the shuttles?The Expanse majors heavily on realistic physics when it comes to all aspects of space travel.
All the ships have stacked decks that are perpendicular to the main engine, so that when the ship is accelerating 'down' is into the deck. Outside shots are frequently created at odd angles to highlight that there isn't really an up or down in the traditional sense. Normal travel involves constant acceleration from the start point to the mid point of the journey, then the ship will flip through 180° so the main engine is pointing towards the destination to provide the same duration of deceleration.
You'll also notice in the combat scenes that the PDC cannons have a small thruster on the back to provide a counterbalance reaction to the gun firing and stop the ship going into an unintended manoeuvre.
IIRC current space craft use either "cold" thrusters (gas), or some form of hot thruster using chemicals that react, I think there is some experimentation with ion thrusters which give really low but prolonged levels of thrust (so good for probes that might be under thrust for months, but not for human craft where you need to balance fuel and life support).Yes it is very well done. Directional/Steering thrust (according to the books) is actually provided via superheated steam jets, referred to colloquially as "The Kettle", was wondering if a similar system was employed on current or past real spacecraft such as Apollo and the shuttles?
Basically, yes.So, what actually happened right at the end... am I being a little bit slow with the...
Mars admiral and the red stuff, is it to do with what Holden saw in his visions and it’ll destroy the human race?
Bearing in mind, I’ve only read the first book so far (which I really enjoyed and keep meaning to read the others!)