Associate
- Joined
- 23 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 512
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
After looking at the vid I would say it is more than 2.8 secs, more like high 3's knocking on 4 secs.
Freefaller said:I need a cam to vid my bikeOver 500bhp/tonne it's going to be grin worthy!
![]()
Gibbo said:Well the evidence is there in video m8, there is no denying the footage its evidence that the car is indeed covering 30-70mph pretty damn quickly.
Also whats this 80hp more business? My 3000GT is not 400BHP, I wish.![]()
fireblade900 said:What bike you got?
Freefaller said:Nothing as worthy as yours I'm afraid. YZF600R ~ 100bhp. That figure is without me on it though![]()
Freefaller said:Nothing as worthy as yours I'm afraid. YZF600R ~ 100bhp. That figure is without me on it though![]()
fireblade900 said:Nice bike. Remember though it's not what you got it's how you ride it that matters![]()
Simon said:Well how much is it? There is no way you going to half a 30-70 time due to your driving
What evidence?
The vid doesnt hit 70, the angle of the camera makes the speedo look like its higher than it is and 70 on the clock isn't 70 in real life. Your using a clock too. Come on seriously, you think a GTO with a bit more boost is quicker than a Ferrari F50 ?
If we are going by vids then, what do you guys reckon this is? admittedly it starts a little over 30. I part throttle at the end
http://www.nfuk.com/Rover/Vids/si30-110.3gp
SDK^ said:Re: Gibbo's vid
If the car is an import is the KPH to MPH conversion correctly mapped?
jamoor said:arent diesels meant to be really good at this sort of thing?
MouseMat2004 said:30-110 looks a bit like this on my bike: http://media.putfile.com/30-110fast