The Huw Edwards situation

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is just going round in circles.

Ultimately if he has done nothing wrong he will get reinstated or a payoff from the BBC and sue the Sun.

I suspect however he will resign from the BBC before they can conclude an investigation and disappear into anonymity.

We’ll see..
 
n111ck said:
Bank statements don’t prove criminality -he could just say it was gifts.

The crack and lawyer came from somewhere so I don’t think anyone is disputing payments - but if any photos have been deleted and the victim doesn’t want to make a complaint there’s not much the police can do.
Click to expand...

So that’s a no then? You’re just randomly making some odd, unsubstantiated insinuations, that are unsupported by any of the evidence that the Metropolitan police have examined to date.

I’m pretty disappointed to be honest, I was hoping I’d missed some kind of smoking gun.

Oh well…
 
Last edited:
GordyR said:
So that’s a no then? You’re just randomly saying some odd, unsubstantiated stuff, that is unsupported by any of the evidence that the Metropolitan police have examined.

I’m pretty disappointed to be honest, I was hoping I’d missed some kind of smoking gun.

Oh well…
Click to expand...


I’m repeating what has been widely circulated in the media - are you saying he made no payments to the victim?
 
n111ck said:
I’m repeating what has been widely circulated in the media - are you saying he made no payments to the victim?
Click to expand...

The police have said that there is no victim.

Are you saying that you have evidence that there was?

If so, then please share it; or are you claiming that there is some kind of conspiracy relating to this case, within the police force?

You appear to have strong opinions on this, so why not share the evidence that has convinced you of this stuff?
 
Last edited:
n111ck said:
Giving someone money isn’t illegal.
Click to expand...
So what's the issue? What information about this case do you know that we don't?

Paying someone under 18 for pornographic pictures would be illegal. The police say they found no evidence of a crime. So that leads me to believe the alleged victim was 18 (an adult) and entitled to enter into legal transactions.
 
Last edited:
visibleman said:
It's not from the incredibly trustworthy "news" outlet who never, ever, ever, publish fake news articles, Politicalite, is it?
Click to expand...
Yes, it is a reliable source.

2 days ago they said the unnamed presenter earned £400,000 then I worked out it was Huw Edwards because it was the only BBC broadcaster earned £400,000.

Then 2 days later I checked site for latest news and found they named him yesterday.

Back in May after watched Eamonn Holmes interview on GBNews talked about former showrunner needed to earned lots and lots of money every week and he and his wife had no idea where former showrunner are since last contact. So I found him worked at pub in Cumbria but 2 weeks later the pub employer caught him took cocaine in gent toilet and he was fired on the spot. Now I know why he needed to earned lots and lots of money every week, he had panic attacks and his mental health was bad after members of public found out who he was and took pictures of him on mobile phone and posted on social media.

Phillip Schofield was absolutely right about social media are cancer that affected his mental health, his former showrunner mate, Huw Edwards and the poor woman too.

I hope Huw Edwards will be reinstated as BBC presenter in a year time. Just like what Ant McPartlin did back in 2014 hid his alcohol and drug addiction to managed his knee pain for years, the car accident and his mental health was so bad afterward. He took a break from TV to get his health sorted out, he later admitted he had an affair with his personal assistant while he was married to Lisa Armstrong and then he returned to TV 1 year later in much better health, sober and clean from drugs. Phillip Schofield should done the same to get him reinstated as This Morning presenter in a year time after his mental and health issue are sort out.
 
Last edited:
GordyR said:
The police have said that there is no victim.

Are you saying that you have evidence that there was?

If so, then please share it; or are you claiming that there is some kind of conspiracy relating to this case, within the police force?

You appear to have strong opinions on this, so why not share the evidence that has convinced you of this stuff?
Click to expand...

In fairness, they have said they are not investigating the matter further because they do not at this time see that it requires further action (i.e. no evidence of a criminal offence).

That doesn’t mean that there isn’t a ‘victim’ in a wider, not-necessarily-criminal sense.

But I’d agree that based on what has been disclosed, the Sun do appear to have been pretty irresponsible with their ‘journalism’.
 
n111ck said:
Are you saying there were no payments?
Click to expand...

Eh? :confused:

You’ve made multiple claims here that directly contradict the findings of two separate policies forces.

I’m simply asking you to provide whatever evidence has convinced you that these police forces are wrong in their conclusions so far.

This isn’t a trick question…

You're either able to provide that evidence, in which case we can all evaluate it and form our own conclusions, or you can’t; in which case anyone remotely rational should completely dismiss what you’ve said.
 
Hades said:
So what's the issue? What information about this case do you know that we don't?

Paying someone under 18 for pornographic pictures would be illegal. The police say they found no evidence of a crime. SO that leads me to believe the alleged victim was 18 (an adult) and entitled to enter into legal transactions.
Click to expand...

So you agree payment’s were made and we understand from the parents that this led to crack addiction?

I originally said the Sun had passed a dossier of evidence to the BBC to aid their disciplinary proceedings and provided a link to evidence that so not really sure what you are frothing about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom