The Intel Quadcore Database

Big.Wayne · 8 Jan 2008 at 20:49

w3bbo said:
blame intel for no x48 yet

Hey I just saw that bit?

Thought you were happy with the P35?

w3bbo · 8 Jan 2008 at 20:53

I was m8...I was happy with 680i....Iwas happy with 975x (well not really)...I was happy with 965p.....I was happy with Nf4 etc etc etc

Any excuse for an upgrade tbh

Big.Wayne · 8 Jan 2008 at 21:05

w3bbo said:
Any excuse

Can't argue with that!

Now how come you find yourself in the *void* of having no motherboard? why did you sell your old mobo weeks before you got your mits on the new one?

w3bbo · 8 Jan 2008 at 23:56

In the theme of ocuk :

I was made an offer I couldn't refuse.

Big.Wayne · 9 Jan 2008 at 00:08

Well I mean, what about the *The Intel Quadcore Database *, you've taken the system offline?

Bit shoddy TBH, who do I speak to about refunds pls?

w3bbo · 9 Jan 2008 at 00:25

lol

We are experiencing difficulties with your request - please try again later.

Pneumonic · 9 Jan 2008 at 00:27

sounds like the Asus RMA

tsinc80697 · 9 Jan 2008 at 01:16

Pneumonic said:
sounds like the Asus RMA

Its not like Asus to give a polite response

Pneumonic · 9 Jan 2008 at 01:22

tsinc80697 said:
Its not like Asus to give a polite response

$5 sucky sucky

but the boards are still the best

Bikerz · 9 Jan 2008 at 09:40

w3bbo said:
No worries m8. I cant don anything about updating the table yet as my pc upgrade is still in bits (blame intel for no x48 yet!) but as soon as its back up and running and I have the database file again I'll sort out everyones details.

Well done everyone!!

No worries mate just thankfull that you put my details up without me furfilling the requirments

tsinc80697 · 9 Jan 2008 at 15:10

Dont think this CPU can go any further!
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=294809

Can't argue with idle temps of 28-28-32-32

Bikerz · 9 Jan 2008 at 15:29

Amazing Tom

tsinc80697 · 9 Jan 2008 at 15:32

MIGHT be able to squeeze a few more mhz out of it, under 45 though as I tried 475x9 and it wouldn't boot at any voltage I tried.
4.25ghz maybe!

back to work, I keep stopping work, playing with the PC then going back to it!

Big.Wayne · 9 Jan 2008 at 15:40

Great overclock but CPU-z screenies? whats the max stable you have been able to squeeze out? you must be pretty much near No.1 now?

tsinc80697 · 9 Jan 2008 at 15:43

Prime I haven't been playing with as at the moment Im mad busy with uni work

Next week I'm going to try and sort prime stability out, I think I can get 4ghz stable, highly doubt 4.2ghz though, but you never know!

HeX · 9 Jan 2008 at 15:50

Nice clocks m8, what volts is it taking you to get in at those speeds?

tsinc80697 · 9 Jan 2008 at 15:56

Think it was 1.65v in windows, maybe 1.64v. Not sure under load as I didn't test it, was just looking for highest bootable clock, pointless really but gave me 20mins off doing work

HeX · 9 Jan 2008 at 15:59

lol, mad vcore, nice suicide shots tho

tsinc80697 · 9 Jan 2008 at 16:07

Yeah exactly lol, not exactly 24/7 operating volts !

Ive managed to get 3.8ghz stable with under 1.5v so I might use that for daily running, just gonna try for something 3dmark06 stable sometime next week then I'll go for prime!

Big.Wayne · 9 Jan 2008 at 16:28

tsinc80697 said:
I think I can get 4ghz stable, highly doubt 4.2ghz though, but you never know!

Well don't let the pressure of grabbing the No.1 spot get to you . . . . . I mean its only major Kudos and all! :cool: