Associate
- Joined
- 30 Apr 2009
- Posts
- 111
I've just completed it tonight and completely agree.
The story was better than average, but nowhere near the level that the hype suggested.
The game mechanics and pacing were excellent, although the graphics on the PS4 version left a lot to be desired. This isn't surprising as it's a PS3 game, but again the hype promised much more than the game offered.
I'd place it marginally ahead of the new Tomb Raider series of games.
The story was a simple idea (which MANY people also had, nothing original)
Basically on of the guys at Naughty Dog saw a documentary about ants which are infected -https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ophiocordyceps_unilateralis
I feel they rushed through (not saying they sacrificed quality) in fear of someone using this idea, as they clearly thought it was unique.
I stand by my comment though , regardless of original / rehashed storyline, they did a brilliant job of portaying it in game (immersion). The game clearly sold on hype though
I played the first Tomb Raider and it was a very solid reboot , I didn't finish it as it just got to a point of following one path and re-using the same mechanics over and over, I haven't played the sequel .
This is jut me though, I prefer open world / multiple approach kind of games.
I liked Hitman Absolution, but hated compared to all the others due to it being much more linear. Many really liked it, we all have our own preferences.