No war here.I completely disagree, but I don’t want to start a war of words about it. Let’s just agree to disagree.
No war here.I completely disagree, but I don’t want to start a war of words about it. Let’s just agree to disagree.
I'd agree if it wasn't for the video, that is damning evidence and there is just no explaining it away. No he hasn't been convicted in a court so he can't be punished by the state but that doesn't mean the public give him a pass and can you imagine any sponsor wanting him near their name and product now? I would imagine ManU will be speaking to their sponsors and monitoring social media closely before making any decisions.
Look you don’t know the lad on a personal basis to know if he’s a horrible person. It’s just audio even if it does sound like we think it sounds.
I had a mate who was accused of beating his misses, the girl released a audio clip of an incident, it didn’t sound great but it certainly did contain enough of anything to make a conclusive judgement.
Everyone has done something wrong on some level or another, I know we have a forum full of saints but this is an anomaly. The guy deserves a chance to show he’s not what everyone thinks he is. If United sack him then fine whatever but if they don’t then fine but let this be a lesson to you.
What video? The one of her injuries? There is no evidence he caused them. The audio clip is far worse but there could be context around it we don't know about.
These cases are always very complex, the fact they are apparently back together is proof of that. It could indeed be that she's being manipulated (as many abused people are), but it's impossible to say without knowing more information.
I haven’t come to any conclusion if you read the first bit I said it doesn’t sound good. Hearing and seeing are different though.How can you listen to that and come to that conclusion? Your mate has nothing to do with this.
How can you listen to that and come to that conclusion? Your mate has nothing to do with this.
It doesn't matter what goes on behind closed doors. He was threatening rape and she quite clearly stated she didn't want sex. If it was a fake clip or not him do you think this would have gone on this long? He probably has to suffer being with her for a year or so before he can dump her and move on. Then it doesn't matter what she says, on one will believe her.
Again, complete speculation and not how the courts and the legal system work. You do not have to be willing to testify, take part or get involved in a case like this if you don't want to. The young woman involved in this could have said from day one that she has no interest in taking this further and wants to retract any statement she made. If the police wish to pursue it, they can. Its just bloody hard to get a conviction.
What do you think would have happened if she would have retracted her accusation a few days after it happened and the police had immediately said "sorry folks, thats it". There would have been a witch hunt. They would have been hauled over the coals. They get enough flak as it is whenever a rape or sexual assault case doesn't result in a conviction.
As many people on twitter don't seem to understand, the CPS won't take a case to court unless they think there is a good chance of winning it. Its costly, traumatic for those involved and there is usually 0 point when there is little chance of conviction. Its not a conspiracy. Rich man hasn't paid off the police or the justice system. This is just a run of the mill case where the people involved were not willing to testify and go to court and the police couldn't find enough evidence to prosecute without them.
As to the authenticity of the clip, thats irrelevant. If both of them turn around and say "this was consensual sex and extreme roleplay between two adults" what would you like the police to do. They can choose not to believe it but they need some proof. They can try and convince the woman to change her mind but if she won't they are stuck.
We don’t know what happened. We’d need full, honest disclosure of the events leading up to and after the audio.But that doesn’t change what happened
Agree the club are doing the right thing in taking time to assess the next step. It is a really awkward situation for them if it had gone to trial they would have had a verdict to back up any decision they make now they can’t sack him as he wins a wrongful dismissal case every time. Do they have a few choices re-integrate him into the team (might not go down well in the media and with sponsors etc) pay him off in full for his contract and part ways or let him sit out his contract at home. Will be interesting to see which way it goes, I was sure he was facing significant jail time and the end of his career but even without a conviction it could end his career.Was he suspended with pay? Presumably not, now they'll have to start paying him.
Can't see him playing again this season. Probably train with the youth squad then farm him out on loan low key somewhere next season once this all blows over until his contract expires would be my guess.
Is he really that good? Is he still going to be after 12 months out with the stress of a very likely jail sentence hanging over him? How are his potential team mates going to react? How's he going to handle the trips to Anfield or Elland rd? Interested to see how the club handles it, they are wise to keep schtum for now.
Yes he was paid, can't not pay someone who hasn't broken their contract.Was he suspended with pay? Presumably not, now they'll have to start paying him.
Don’t know why you felt the need to type all that or how that changes anything or anything I didn’t already know.
It’s important people realise he needs a chance to better himself. Let’s hope this was that catalyst.Hearing that audio clip was enough for me, find him some help and support to better himself but I wouldn't want to be associated with an attitude like that.