The Newcastle United Club Thread **No Spoilers**

Soldato
Joined
14 Oct 2007
Posts
8,871
Location
newcastle
What a pair of numpties :D

1: you have someone actively working on gardening leave at City :D

2: someone just been caught breaking his non disclosure agreement with two clubs lol

100% this has been leaked by the club and the timing is very suspect!!

I suspect this is to flush Manu oit and back to the table. It was Craig who had information that Newcastle wanted nothing close to 20million for Ashworth but Manu offer was chumps change.
The offer from Manu was £2m apparently, £3m less than what we paid Brighton, and we wanted £8-12m to release him from his gardening leave. If it’s true the arrogance and entitlement from them is astounding.


An email that Dan Ashworth sent to himself about being approached by Manchester United could be crucial in the forthcoming arbitration against his former club Newcastle United.
Ashworth, who is still being paid his salary of more than £1 million a year by Newcastle despite being on gardening leave for three months, emailed the incoming Manchester United chief executive, Omar Berrada, making it clear that he wanted to accept an offer to become the club’s sporting director after the pair had held a conversation in early February.
In doing so, he sent a blind copy to his own Newcastle email address. Club staff were therefore aware of that message when Ashworth, their sporting director at the time, revealed to them that he wanted to talk to officials at Old Trafford about taking up a post there.
The email sent to Berrada by Ashworth also went to the sporting director’s Newcastle address
PA
The Premier League’s rules state that each club and director should behave towards each other with the “utmost good faith” and it could be a breach if they were to “act dishonestly towards another club or engage in conduct that is intended to circumvent these rules”.
It is felt this information could now be crucial in swinging the pendulum in favour of Newcastle before the arbitration that Ashworth and Manchester United hoped would help to facilitate his move to the club. It had been due to start at the end of this month.
The Times can reveal that Manchester United have so far offered about £2.5million to end the 53-year-old’s gardening leave and allow him to begin his new job this summer but the clubs remain some distance apart.
That is less than Newcastle paid Brighton & Hove Albion when they took him to St James’ Park in June 2022. It is thought that Ashworth disclosed details to Berrada, who is also on gardening leave and will begin his position at Old Trafford after a move from Manchester City on July 13, of the agreement that took him to Newcastle. That could be a breach of confidentiality.
Ashworth’s gardening leave in his contract with Newcastle is due to run until October next year. Newcastle are still open to negotiation to end the impasse but want a figure of about £10 million.
Newcastle’s desire is for the figure to reflect Ashworth’s worth, what the club paid Brighton and also what he has received in salary and bonuses since taking up his position at St James’ Park.
Sir Jim Ratcliffe, Manchester United’s new minority shareholder, was critical of Newcastle’s stance in February. He said then: “I think it’s a bit silly, personally. What I do think is completely absurd is suggesting a man who is really good at his job sits in his garden for 1½ years.”
Manchester United declined to comment on the story.”
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
12 Oct 2006
Posts
10,510
Location
Tatooine
The offer from Manu was £2m apparently, £3m less than what we paid Brighton, and we wanted £8-12m to release him from his gardening leave. If it’s true the arrogance and entitlement from them is astounding.
I be surprised if this goes to arbitration now which is due end of this month or next?

Ole Jim is some pup. Demanding that Tax payers pay for their stadium upgrade. Goes publicly and condemns Newcastle in their stance over Ashworth while in the background you have them two clowns working via email and teams breaking their contracts lol with their current clubs.

Seems like a cards on the table moment as most cases don’t go into arbitration.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Oct 2007
Posts
8,871
Location
newcastle
I be surprised if this goes to arbitration now which is due end of this month or next?

Ole Jim is some pup. Demanding that Tax payers pay for their stadium upgrade. Goes publicly and condemns Newcastle in their stance over Ashworth while in the background you have them two clowns working via email and teams breaking their contracts lol with their current clubs.

Seems like a cards on the table moment as most cases don’t go into arbitration.
He just seems like a richer version of of Mike “parasite” Ashley
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Jul 2004
Posts
4,683
Location
Melbourne , Oz.
Went to the game at the MCG last night. Nothing much to report. Similar pace to a testimonial and a handball goal by Maddison from a lazy and awful clearance by Pope. 78,000 there though for a cold Wednesday night friendly played on a cricket pitch. Was all a bit predictable other than actually winning a shootout. Howe started a pretty much full strength team but by midway through the second half was basically a U21 side. Wilson the sub was subbed, probably got injured on the plane.
Great reception for Garang Kuol when the lad came on, took his penalty well but other than that he was rancid. To be fair though there seemed little gameplan by then and felt like both sets of players and the supporters just wanted it to be over so we could all go home. Newcastle fans clearly out numbered those supporting Spurs although I expect a lot were Collingwood AFL fans as it's a pretty easy transition to make apart from the fact they've actually won stuff in the last 60 years. Smaller ground for Fridays game although still essentially a rectangle in the middle of a cricket pitch preceding Arsenals lasses playing but I'll not be going. 5pm KO too which is a bit odd. Starting with the team he did (actually both managers) feels like it was some sort of contractual obligation, would think he's free of that for Friday given its not even top billing. Be a shame for the women's teams to see most of the fans streaming out before they kick off though, I'd have switched them round.

Daft thing to do this time of year but its worth a few quid to the club and 78,000 people got to see Isak put the ball in the net in front of them and can tell their grand kids they saw him live when he was just a Newcastle player.

I have had much, much worse days at that ground in the past. Thanks Bazzball.

 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
14 Oct 2007
Posts
8,871
Location
newcastle
Went to the game at the MCG last night. Nothing much to report. Similar pace to a testimonial and a handball goal by Maddison from a lazy and awful clearance by Pope. 78,000 there though for a cold Wednesday night friendly played on a cricket pitch. Was all a bit predictable other than actually winning a shootout. Howe started a pretty much full strength team but by midway through the second half was basically a U21 side. Wilson the sub was subbed, probably got injured on the plane.
Great reception for Garang Kuol when the lad came on, took his penalty well but other than that he was rancid. To be fair though there seemed little gameplan by then and felt like both sets of players and the supporters just wanted it to be over so we could all go home. Newcastle fans clearly out numbered those supporting Spurs although I expect a lot were Collingwood AFL fans as it's a pretty easy transition to make apart from the fact they've actually won stuff in the last 60 years. Smaller ground for Fridays game although still essentially a rectangle in the middle of a cricket pitch preceding Arsenals lasses playing but I'll not be going. 5pm KO too which is a bit odd. Starting with the team he did (actually both managers) feels like it was some sort of contractual obligation, would think he's free of that for Friday given its not even top billing. Be a shame for the women's teams to see most of the fans streaming out before they kick off though, I'd have switched them round.

Daft thing to do this time of year but its worth a few quid to the club and 78,000 people got to see Isak put the ball in the net in front of them and can tell their grand kids they saw him live when he was just a Newcastle player.

I have had much, much worse days at that ground in the past. Thanks Bazzball.

Not sure if it’s true, but it’s been suggested what we’re getting paid is what we’re short on this years P&S figures
 
Don
Joined
9 Jun 2004
Posts
46,530
80 quid for a shirt man ouch.
Yea but they are giving £5 of that to the foundation ;)

And I know you guys don’t like Ashley but his claim against the club re their deal with JD Sports is exactly about your reaction to the price of the shirt. Newcastle fans on the whole will be paying more for their club merchandise than if Sportsdirect were selling them too.
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Oct 2006
Posts
10,510
Location
Tatooine
Yea but they are giving £5 of that to the foundation ;)

And I know you guys don’t like Ashley but his claim against the club re their deal with JD Sports is exactly about your reaction to the price of the shirt. Newcastle fans on the whole will be paying more for their club merchandise than if Sportsdirect were selling them too.
On you mean the same Mike that laughed at fans for even buying shirts in the first place?

I’ll happily spend the extra tenner or was it 5quid extra for the new gear compared to the Castore tat.
 
Last edited:
Don
Joined
9 Jun 2004
Posts
46,530
On you mean the same Mike that laughed at fans for even buying shirts in the first place?

I’ll happily spend the extra tenner or was it 5quid extra for the new gear compared to the Castore tat.
Whether Ashley (or anybody) thinks supporters are stupid paying £60, £70 or £80 for a shirt, it has no relevance to what I said. I think most people, including many of the people that buy the shirts think it's stupid to pay as much as supporters do for shirts.

And it's not a case of Adidas or Castore but you're shocked/complaining about the price of this shirt and at the same time support the club in agreeing a deal that is 100% designed to make supporters pay more for their shirts, just because you don't like Mike Ashley. Less competition means prices stay high. Sports Direct (and others) being blocked from selling Newcastle shirts mean you're going to be paying more for your kit than you would have been.
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Oct 2006
Posts
10,510
Location
Tatooine
Whether Ashley (or anybody) thinks supporters are stupid paying £60, £70 or £80 for a shirt, it has no relevance to what I said. I think most people, including many of the people that buy the shirts think it's stupid to pay as much as supporters do for shirts.

And it's not a case of Adidas or Castore but you're shocked/complaining about the price of this shirt and at the same time support the club in agreeing a deal that is 100% designed to make supporters pay more for their shirts, just because you don't like Mike Ashley. Less competition means prices stay high. Sports Direct (and others) being blocked from selling Newcastle shirts mean you're going to be paying more for your kit than you would have been.

Well lad you just couldn’t help yourself having a dig about 5 quid to the Newcastle foundation could yah :D

75 quid for Castro or 80 for adidas with a 5 quid going the the Foundation until the end of it a few months.

Not a penny goes to Mike. Fantastic:D

Sounds like a win win to me.
 
Don
Joined
9 Jun 2004
Posts
46,530
Well lad you just couldn’t help yourself having a dig about 5 quid to the Newcastle foundation could yah :D

75 quid for Castro or 80 for adidas with a 5 quid going the the Foundation until the end of it a few months.

Not a penny goes to Mike. Fantastic:D

Sounds like a win win to me.
I wasn't having a dig at them giving £5 to the Newcastle foundation, I was pointing out that it was nothing more than a PR exercise as they've just hit you with an £80 shirt. Now I don't know if you're gullible enough to have bought it or if you're now just going ultra defensive and digging yourself a hole.

And you're missing the point entirely, again I don't know if that's intentional or otherwise. This has nothing to do with Castore. By Newcastle agreeing a deal with JD that prevents other retailers from selling this current Adidas shirt, Newcastle supporters will ultimately pay more than they would have if Newcastle hadn't agreed that deal.

This isn't a defence of Mike Ashley and I'm under no illusions regarding Ashley's motives for bringing his claim against the club. It's a defence of Newcastle supporters and in this situation, Ashley's interests and Newcastle fans are aligned. But if you are happy to pay £80 rather than potentially £70 or £65 for the exact same Adidas shirt then maybe Ashley was right about supporters being stupid.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Oct 2007
Posts
8,871
Location
newcastle
Whether Ashley (or anybody) thinks supporters are stupid paying £60, £70 or £80 for a shirt, it has no relevance to what I said. I think most people, including many of the people that buy the shirts think it's stupid to pay as much as supporters do for shirts.

And it's not a case of Adidas or Castore but you're shocked/complaining about the price of this shirt and at the same time support the club in agreeing a deal that is 100% designed to make supporters pay more for their shirts, just because you don't like Mike Ashley. Less competition means prices stay high. Sports Direct (and others) being blocked from selling Newcastle shirts mean you're going to be paying more for your kit than you would have been.
You realise that SD had the same exclusively that JD sports have now
 
Back
Top Bottom