The next James Bond could be...

Soldato
Joined
8 Nov 2006
Posts
7,073
Location
Ireland/Northern Ireland Border
The point is that race is an intrinsic factor in those characters because the stories concern race, racism, etc. I've yet to see it explained why race is intrinsic to Bond, particularly in the modern day when it's harder to argue a white establishment that would only employ white spies, or whatever.

By your logic there is no reason why James Bond couldn't be Jane Bond in the next film. However I strongly disagree. James Bond is a white role.

What next Mr T being cast as a white man in a new A-Team movie? Mr. T is a role that has little reference (if any) to race but I pity the fool that casts a white man in that role.

Some fictional characters are just black or white, male or female, it isn't a slight against anyone.
 
Caporegime
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Posts
48,104
Location
On the hoods
By your logic there is no reason why James Bond couldn't be Jane Bond in the next film. However I strongly disagree. James Bond is a white role.

What next Mr T being cast as a white man in a new A-Team movie? Mr. T is a role that has little reference (if any) to race but I pity the fool that casts a white man in that role.

Some fictional characters are just black or white, male or female, it isn't a slight against anyone.

There's an awful lot of "just because" logic in this argument.

As for Jane Bond, I'd need to be convinced that she was a physical match for her foes. You'd need someone comparably strong and vicious as Xenia Onatopp.
 
Associate
Joined
10 Mar 2005
Posts
1,766
Would be nothing more than a marketing gimmick to boost the franchise and give it a few more years. I think Idris Elba deserves better than that - like, oh I don't know, maybe a new character that he can take on and make his own and build a franchise off that.

Of course, that won't happen as it requires creativity and patience - things the modern film industry seems to lack. I mean why bother when you can just knock out another Transformers movie or reboot another superhero?

I'd rather they actually got on with bringing Luther to the cinema screen....I know it's still being actively discussed - hope it happens. Maybe they'll make a franchise out of that.
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Jul 2012
Posts
15,897
Location
London
No, my point is that you can't even point to some sort of 50s era Britain where a black man might have struggled to get into such a position.

Perhaps I missed the comment that it was in response to, but has anyone made that argument?

Bond is meant to be a secret agent, someone black would standout like a sore thumb

Doesn't that really depend on the assignment and couldn't the reverse be equally true?
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Jun 2003
Posts
8,733
Location
sawley/ long eaton
Perhaps I missed the comment that it was in response to, but has anyone made that argument?



Doesn't that really depend on the assignment and couldn't the reverse be equally true?

yeah but very limited, but now they have ran out of books though they could write him anyway they like, but I still don't see it working.
I have grown up with bond from the 60s and he is white, somethings should just not be messed with
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
Bond is meant to be a secret agent, someone black would standout like a sore thumb
in the world of bond

Posted from Overclockers.co.uk App for Android

He's a secret agent that tells everyone his name, and all the villains always have his details on file ;) He's like the least secret agent, ever :p

My gut reaction was that this is a PC move, but upon actually thinking about it, I don't see really why he shouldn't be black. I'd be prepared to give him a chance in the role.

Besides, recent Bond films haven't been all that great, no matter the actor involved. The only decent Craig Bond so far has been Skyfall - the others were gash.
 
Caporegime
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Posts
48,104
Location
On the hoods
Perhaps I missed the comment that it was in response to, but has anyone made that argument?

No, but I was heading it off at the pass, as it's about the only plausible argument I could see if we were talking about Bond set in the 50s/60s. As we're not, it's not even relevant on that front. It's the same sort of reason we might once have objected to a female M, because a woman at that level would have been basically unthinkable in times gone by.
 
Caporegime
Joined
28 Jan 2003
Posts
39,881
Location
England
No, but I was heading it off at the pass, as it's about the only plausible argument I could see if we were talking about Bond set in the 50s/60s. As we're not, it's not even relevant on that front. It's the same sort of reason we might once have objected to a female M, because a woman at that level would have been basically unthinkable in times gone by.

Or the fact he was created as a white man and there's no real sense, apart from it being a gimmick, to change that. That's the character that was created.

It's just one of those things, it's not racist that he'd stay white, and someone saying he should stay White is not a racist either.
 
Caporegime
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Posts
48,104
Location
On the hoods
Or the fact he was created as a white man and there's no real sense, apart from it being a gimmick, to change that. That's the character that was created.

It's just one of those things, it's not racist that he'd stay white, and someone saying he should stay White is not a racist either.

But why, and no one has yet answered this, is his skin colour sacrosanct, but not his height, build, hair colour, eye colour, age, manner...?
 
Back
Top Bottom