What makes you think that people need them to form their opinion for them? Have you considered that maybe they're just interested in their take on it, much like we operate on this very forum?Why do people care what some YouTube end of a bell thinks? Form your own opinion
What makes you think that people need them to form their opinion for them? Have you considered that maybe they're just interested in their take on it, much like we operate on this very forum?
Because there are other people here that also like the youtuber in question? I assume you're referring to Drinker.Great, why do those people think we want to hear about it here?
I'm not bothered, I just think he's a *******. If everyone wants to talk about him I'm sure they will continue.Because there are other people here that also like the youtuber in question? I assume you're referring to Drinker.
When you say 'we', you mean you. Not sure why it bothers you so much, or why you're acting like the forum should revolve around your personal tastes.
Missed your edit.Great if they do, but why do those people think we want to hear about it here? I'll stick with the spirit of my post above, why is his opinion of any more import than anyone here for example?
Just watched Drinkers pre review and his review.
Better than I thought it would be.
Seems he really wanted to hate it but found something semi decent.
He does pull away from the Geeks and Gamer crowd in that respect. You said the magic word "Disney" and what they did to Gina this film was up against it.Or.
He doesn't really have an opinion of his own because he makes too much money ******** on Disney/woke/Mary Sue etc talking points and it backfired a bit here.
Back to 92He does pull away from the Geeks and Gamer crowd in that respect. You said the magic word "Disney" and what they did to Gina this film was up against it.
An example that he doesn't follow that group would be Peacemaker.
That crowd was already starting to roll with Mary Sue, best female ever etc but he shot that straight down in his review.
He is very insightful on scripts and better than most paid media critics. They are paid so no different than youtubers tailoring their content to their audience. They are both sides of a coin. You are only kidding yourself otherwise.
He did surprise me here actually saying its half decent which bought up some valid points.
I miss Barry Norman hah
They quickly made a U-turn on that decision and now show loads of 15/18 rated films and shows.Heard great things...not sure entirely why it's on a platform (Disney)that said originally no above pg content to be shown.
I skimmed through his Dr strange 2 review and realised he didnt know it research much about marvel. He said something to the effect like who are the illuminati or they're wannabe avengersHe is very insightful on scripts and better than most paid media critics. They are paid so no different than youtubers tailoring their content to their audience. They are both sides of a coin. You are only kidding yourself otherwise.
Disney seems to have quite quickly moved into a range of content not traditionally Disney fare.
Heard great things...not sure entirely why it's on a platform (Disney)that said originally no above pg content to be shown.
Disney seems to have quite quickly moved into a range of content not traditionally Disney fare.
LMFAO.....no...just no...he is not.He does pull away from the Geeks and Gamer crowd in that respect. You said the magic word "Disney" and what they did to Gina this film was up against it.
An example that he doesn't follow that group would be Peacemaker.
That crowd was already starting to roll with Mary Sue, best female ever etc but he shot that straight down in his review.
He is very insightful on scripts and better than most paid media critics. They are paid so no different than youtubers tailoring their content to their audience. They are both sides of a coin. You are only kidding yourself otherwise.
He did surprise me here actually saying its half decent which bought up some valid points.
I miss Barry Norman hah