Soldato
- Joined
- 19 May 2005
- Posts
- 6,892
CpwAm I correct in assuming you work for one of the UK telecom operators? Was it EE?
CpwAm I correct in assuming you work for one of the UK telecom operators? Was it EE?
Any decent usb3-usbc cables which will support rapid charge? I bought some Anker power line+ usb2 ones but they just charge at normal speed, reading around I need the usb3 ones, but not sure even they will work.
That explains itYou can't get rapid charging through USB-A, it has to be a USB-C to USB-C cable
USB-A quick charge protocols break the official USB protocols (using data wires to transfer current I think) so you need to have the phone configured to accept that fast charge, and Google refuse to do so.Ahaaaa. Ok cool. My laptop at work has usbc, so will get a usbc for there and just use slow charging when visiting friends
Layman asking, what's the reason behind that? Limitations of usba?
Hi everyone,
I don't really need a new phone, but my girlfriend does and I can get myself a good deal on the pixel XL 2 (I like the idea of vanilla android). I was just wondering if the screen issues have been fixed in the latest models to come off the line? I looked at a model in CPW before Xmas and the screen did look very underwhelming.
It's a real shame that they cost cutted an one of the most critical components. It's not something you can or should get away with IMO - especially when it's in the same price bracket as S8+/note 8.
I just checked my screen settings and it appears it was set to boosted. I thought the standard setting was natural? That was the first time I had been in the menu.
Boosted is the default setting. Natural is available too, as well as saturated:
https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/6111557?hl=en-GB
Think the issue was completely overblown from the start and have been using my Pixel 2 XL for several months and have not thought about any screen issues at all because in my opinion, they just do not exist or matter to enjoying this great phone.
I believe a number of perceived screen issues were addressed by an early November security patch update. Google provided users a display option (in addition to the normal setting) called a saturated option in Settings. I suggest that Google wants us to use the natural/normal setting (I do) but for those of us who wanted their OLED screen to resemble past experience, they provided a saturated option.
Whether you think the security patch addressed any perceived issue is a matter of opinion. In mine, I never really noticed the issue and have not given it any further thought.
If you have been following recent posts you will see that the two Pixel phones saw the most "activation" growth of any leading smartphone in the US over the all-important Christmas selling season(they ranked one and two, ahead of the iPhone X, and way ahead of the iPhone 8s), and I would not be surprised if that was the same in the UK.
Thanks for your input. The first thing I did when I went into CPW and picked up the pixel was to go into the settings and see if I ramp up the saturation slightly. Unfortunately the settings were all locked, so I wasn't able to see the difference it made.
To be honest, I don't mind natural looking colours. It was more of the fact that the screen looked quite grainy, like there was a film of fine sand between the panel on the glass. Sounds like a manufacturing by product that shouldn't have made it past QC. I'd love to see an example of a very recently shipped phone to see if they had upped their QC game. Hopefully someone at work will have got one over Christmas and I can take a look at it tomorrow. It looks like a great phone (although **** Google for getting rid of the headphone jack - Samsung and other manufacturers with the jack, with even sleeker designs and better waterproofing have proven that removing it is just unnecessary. /Rant)
Oh really, tell me about this super well thought out coherent philosophy and where wireless charging fits in please...Please let us know your impressions of the Pixel 2/Pixel 2 XL phone if you see one at work.
On your rant, I am reminded of a Google philosophy I once read: they like to skate to where the puck is going, not where it has been. Dangling wires that need to be tucked in just seems so yesterday. Wireless or near wireless seems the way to go.