They've made a response to those criticisms:
Fair enough about the up scaling. Still, they should not have added any sharpening at all as it just makes things worse (why I never add any to my photos at all).
Also how many people print phone photos?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/504c0/504c01027866aa22f96a5f2d3e8b91463e55ad81" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
I would imagine that most people just view them on the monitor, TV, share them via email, whatsapp/SMS etc.
They added another update:
Update 2, Feb 24: Even though the original source of the photos claimed they've focused on the model's face we find that hard to believe as we know it from first-hand that when you manually focus on a subject's face with the iPhone 5 camera, it would expose the photo for that particular region. In this case, the iPhone 5 severely overexposed the face making us doubtful that the author of the images correctly focused on the face. Even if this was the case and it was the face that's in focus, then we see no reason why the dress and the hair shouldn't be in perfect focus too, as they lie in generally the same vertical plane as the face. You can clearly see that even though the iPhone 5 significantly overexposed the shot (which we tried to counter in post-processing by toning down the exposure a bit), it still resolved much more detail in the hair, the gem stone and the texture of the dress than the HTC One.
Again, we got lots of comments saying that we've missed mentioning that the iPhone pretty much blew away the face of the model by overexposing the shot. We'd like to clarify that we consider the differences in the exposure to be operator-error and since we weren't there to confirm or deny that, we just have to work with what we have. We explicitly mentioned that we are only judging resolved detail and noise levels here - not exposure metering, color rendition or any other camera parameter. Indeed, it's not possible to sample resolved detail out of an overexposed area of a photo, so we skipped the face and went to pick a sample from the dress instead.End of Update 2
Did the guy who took the pictures not say that he just let the camera do everything, so pointed and took the shot, didn't manually focus? In some ways that is a good test imo as a lot of the time (if I want to take a quick snap of something) I don't manually focus, just press the shutter button and let the photo be taken and with my one S, if there are white/bright objects with bright light shining on them, then it would encounter a similar problem to the iphone 5 in that portrait shot but if I focus on the face then it would end up like the htc one photo except the background stuff would be either dark or lit up (depending on background and lighting).
Also "which we tried to counter in post-processing by toning down the exposure a bit", seriously just leave the photos alone......compare them at their original size with the up and down scaled comparisons, might as well go and tweak every photos colour levels, noise levels etc.....
Only just seen this here "What we are looking to compare here is resolved detail and digital noise." So fair enough there again, personally I still think the one looks better overall with regards to clarity/noise when viewing the original photos without zooming in.
Just have to wait for better/more accurate tests, shouldn't be too long, maybe start seeing some reviews within the next week.
Well, even on some Android phones you can't pick a specific resolution. Aside from tests such as this I don't see why you would anyway.
Every android phone that I have played with, you can pick whatever resolution/MP you want!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8852d/8852d2062d7110393ceea768b048b31c5d4853ef" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
True, there isn't really any need for that option as every one will always keep it set to the highest anyway
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8852d/8852d2062d7110393ceea768b048b31c5d4853ef" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"