Good for a comparision against other phones though, I.E the One S. Doing the same tests will give you an idea how it compares to another phone.
Nope, not really.
The 'web browsing' test is defined by the screens power consumption showing ~90% 'white on' at 50%/medium brightness and the cache/rendering efficiency of the browser. (a website is reloaded every 10 seconds, all you'll see is white background for the most part with the html being loaded off the cache)
Swap to a ~30% 'white on' website, maybe like ocUK, at an equal brightness candela, not the phones generic percent value, say 150-200nits for indoors use and the results would be very different. OLED phones with full caching would 'win' or set a low brightness @ 50%/medium and your phone will 'win' too (HTC Radar)
The video playback is dodgy too, they just loop a dark SD Xvid video. This tests the generic video player format support and the screens power consumption with <20% 'white on' at 50% brightness.
They even converted the Xvid to .m4v for the iPhone 4S test, otherwise it would've got 7 hours with a 3rd party player... Mmm, consistent. Some of those results have probably been defined by software decoding fall-back too, (HTC Radar again, over 1 hour less than its 'web browsing' result lol)
So OLED with great Xvid support wins.
Last edited: