Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jun 2009
- Posts
- 5,460
- Location
- No Mans Land
Compared to Nvidia I thought all AMD stuff was mid range at best?
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
** The Official Nvidia GeForce 'Pascal' Thread - for general gossip and discussions **
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
Compared to Nvidia I thought all AMD stuff was mid range at best?
Tell me about it.. shame I can't roll my own graphics as well! haha.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
Id class the 1080 as high end.
It's just that the 1080 ti and titan if they appear will be ultra Hugh end and push the 1080 down in price and pecking order.
It's just that the 1080 ti and titan if they appear will be ultra Hugh end and push the 1080 down in price and pecking order.
They are making rollable OLED displays so it might not be far off.
I want to some see custom card reviews.... I read that some custom cards might be out on the 27th? Or that could be "founders" cooler but from brands like EVGA etc?
I want to see the gigabyte xtreme etc. I have a feeling they will be good.
I want to see the gigabyte xtreme etc. I have a feeling they will be good.
Who wants only a crappy 60fps in this day and age...
Sorry if its been posted already but 1070 specs and stuff is out.
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1070
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1070
Who wants only a crappy 60fps in this day and age...
3440x1440 is bad enough for GPU requirements... and the difference between 60 to 70-80 looks huge to me.... but still I read through a lot of the reviews and so many comments at the bottom saying "disappointed this does not run 4k 60fps"
All I want is 60+ fps at 3440x1440 with high / very high settings and I will be happy, the 980ti is always about 25% too slow at good settings so the 1080 will be good enough as long as it can beat a 980ti at 1.4ghz by at least 25-30% which looks like it should do that.
Last edited:
I actually want the 1070 to beat the 980ti now that my 980ti is gone, because that will mean I made a good decision and did not spend a month on a 5870 for nothing. But looking at the specs I do not think it will be better than a 980ti, probably better stock vs stock at 1080p but not more than that.
I think the higher the res there will be less of a chance it will beat a 980ti.
I used to be happy with 60 fps. Went to 144 never looked back. About 90-100fps is my minimum now. 60-85 is a big difference though. I notice just a big of a difference to 144 but that's just me
.
I notice the difference but I prefer 75fps at 3440x1440 vs 100fps at 2560x1400, I had a PG279Q and it was definitely faster and less laggy than the X34, but overall I still prefer the X34 because of the size. I agree that 60 looks bad compared to higher, I did not notice it but now I have used higher it looks jerky and anything under about 50 looks like a slideshow.
I think an overclocked 980ti will still beat a 1070, but as 90% of people still use 1080p they would probably rather have a new 1070 than a used 980ti.
And 8gbs of memory too.
Do we have any specs on the 1070 anywhere? As thats the card i'm thinking of buying when it launches. Should i wait 48 hours after launch to see some reviews perhaps?
Upgrading from a 450 GTS, so it'll be a substantial upgrade either way.
Upgrading from a 450 GTS, so it'll be a substantial upgrade either way.
Few posts up mate.
There are specs on a previous page, no benchmark leaks yet though, Either way the 1070 will be a good upgrade for you.
Did you know the 1070 cooler will be "in plastic, it's fantastic!"