Bear in mind firefox and chrome have been nicknamed as ssd killers, a typical desktop ssd does a ton of writes just from web browsers alone, which a games console wont have to do. I monitored the writes on my kingston daily with chrome running of it and it was in excess of 4 gig a day in writes. That was without a pagefile (most will have a pagefile enabled on ssd) and also with temporary internet files on ramdisk. Windows also wastefully writes to a lot of logs as well, you have the windows search db, and steam will download all patches and games to the system ssd even if the game library is on a different drive. So I think unless they using really low quality QLC crap, and/or a very small nand capacity I think it will be ok. Plus I am expecting them to use a hdd/nand combo so writes may well initially go to spindle and then move to nand based on a caching algorithm. They may then in such a system make sure things like video recording always goes to spindle.