Sanctions are possibly transferred together with the transfer of the SPL share from the old club to the new club.
The Rangers Saga and Fallout Thread
- Thread starter Ace Modder
- Start date
- Status
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2005
- Posts
- 16,138
- Location
- Paisley
You are right, any EBT sanctions for the old club should stay with the old club, along with the redistribution of leagues/cups.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 1,492
- Location
- kintyre
so you want no sanctions now as long as rangers lose their history, what a bitter guy you are, there is no old club the football side lives on.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 1,492
- Location
- kintyre
haha
Hardly, it's a statement of fact. The only sanctions a new club can possibly get are those associated with the SPL share. Everything else stays with the liquidated club.
If there is only one club and it still exists we wouldn't be talking about SPL share transfers, applying for membership to the SFA or TUPE undertakings.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 1,492
- Location
- kintyre
its NOT a new club,thats fantasy, the club is an asset which is transfered to the newco.
Sorry, but there's only one fantasy here.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 1,492
- Location
- kintyre
Are you even going to provide a source for that. If players have contracts with the club as a separate entity to the company TUPE does not apply.
When the club was incorporated, it became the company!
Edit: Is it a Duffer & Dufferism?
When the club was incorporated, it became the company!
Edit: Is it a Duffer & Dufferism?
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 1,492
- Location
- kintyre
None of which addresses my points of TUPE, SFA membership or suspicious lack of it, or susicious lack of an SPL share that still remains with Rangers Football Club.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 1,492
- Location
- kintyre
thats as maybe mate but ive adressed the losing our history guff.
No you haven't all you've demonstrated is that Rangers Football Club PLC operated as Rangers Football Club in Scotland - in fact it just reinforces that the club and company are the same entity and that Rangers Football Club is just the day to day trading name.
interesting read regarding history. Thing I hit all the swears edited out.TOTALLY FED UP WITH THE MEDIA PEDDLING ####, IT REALLY NEEDS TO BE EMPHASIZED TO ANY BRAINLESS #### THAT STILL BELIEVE ANY NEWCO MEANS THE END OF THE AND OUR ENVIED HISTORY!
What has happened is a tupe transfer, this is an asset purchase from the liquidators of the Plc (the asset being rangers football club, not the rangers football club Plc!)
and transfer via tupe transfer to a new corporate vehicle.
The Rangers Football Club was founded in 1872. When the club was founded it was not incorporated into any company and ran for almost 20 years until it decided to be incorporated within a company. The incorporation of the The Rangers Football Club back then did not mean that because it was incorporated, it therefore lost the history which the club had accumulated during the previous 20 years. While the corporate body which owned the club in the years since then may now cease to operate after today, the re-incorporation of The Rangers Football Club into a new corporate body from today means that The Rangers Football Club continues and so does its history.
If any proof is required that these are 2 separate entities, I'd point you in the directions of the Scottish courts.
http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinion...CSOH 95.html
The first few lines are significant : -
"This is a petition for judicial review by the Rangers Football Club plc, a company presently in administration. That company presently operates Rangers Football Club (to whom I shall refer as "Rangers"). Rangers are members of the Scottish Football Association ("the SFA"), and are bound by the Articles of the SFA"
The line
That Company "presently operates " Rangers Football Club.
This is proof that any new Company will continue to "presently operate " Rangers Football Club.
So let's be clear, there should be no doubting here.
The operating Company may change but The Club remains the same.
So to anyone that was looking forward to "having a, party when the rangers die" get it right ******* round every one of you, as your wee dream scenario ain't happening
It is if you want to keep your head in the sand.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_name
This is what Lord Glennie is addressing. It is the same legal entity.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 1,492
- Location
- kintyre
we live in the same cyber universe mate
It's a small world, one which McRod is also a member of.
It didn't operate a rangers football club out operated rangers football club there it's a distinct difference. As for Mark. Wiki really.
It really isn't I'm afraid. The pain passes with time, you have my consolations.
It really is. We'll have to agree to disagree.
- Status