The Rangers Saga and Fallout Thread
- Thread starter Ace Modder
- Start date
- Status
From the sounds of things the SFL will get more money than what the SPL were offering and that all the clubs would benefit. With the way the SPL have acted towards the SFL clubs with the Rangers vote they need to be told where to go.
Also, if the SPL can't pay the contracted fees then does anyone know what punishments would come in?
We look forward to causing a cup upset
I see its in BBC ALBA EPG now as well.
Maybe it's all been a conspiracy to get people to watch BBC Alba?
From the sounds of things the SFL will get more money than what the SPL were offering and that all the clubs would benefit. With the way the SPL have acted towards the SFL clubs with the Rangers vote they need to be told where to go.
Also, if the SPL can't pay the contracted fees then does anyone know what punishments would come in?
Maybe it's all been a conspiracy to get people to watch BBC Alba?
Law suit as its a contractual payment. Perhaps suspend their league status
And as for Alba I can watch it with the sound muted
to be fair with all this rubbish holding x y and z to ransom if the cup game doesn't go ahead I'm sure brechin will have a case to claim losses from all parties seeing their incompetence is the cause of this mess yet so far we're forking out cash to hold the match. 
SPL have nothing to do with Sevco so demanding SFL TV rights is wrong.
SPL should not drop the investigation into dual contracts. If wrongdoing is proved, Rangers should be stripped of those trophies won during that time. They should not be awarded to runners up. Let the record books show those trophies were tainted.
The SFA should award a license if Sevco meet the criteria for membership. If Sevco dont, then no license. It is that simple.
The SPL are contractually obliged to give the SFL money each season. Surely in the last year of the Sky contract, that money has already been received, so where is it? Only next year and the possible new Sky contract at reduced terms would allow for renegotiation of the fee paid to the SFL.
SPL should not drop the investigation into dual contracts. If wrongdoing is proved, Rangers should be stripped of those trophies won during that time. They should not be awarded to runners up. Let the record books show those trophies were tainted.
The SFA should award a license if Sevco meet the criteria for membership. If Sevco dont, then no license. It is that simple.
The SPL are contractually obliged to give the SFL money each season. Surely in the last year of the Sky contract, that money has already been received, so where is it? Only next year and the possible new Sky contract at reduced terms would allow for renegotiation of the fee paid to the SFL.
Seems that the SPL are trying to negotiate an eight-year deal with Sky and are getting desperate to sort something out with the TV rights to Rangers matches, using the £2m as leverage. Unfortunately for them the SFL know they don't need the SPL and bids are expected to be finalised by 12pm today.
Last edited:
Agreed and the SPL should investigate all it's member clubs over dual contracts and not just Rangers
They did, only Celtic was found to have used EBTs and that was for a player payoff and they subsequently paid tax on it.Agreed and the SPL should investigate all it's member clubs over dual contracts and not just Rangers
In the EPL though, plenty of clubs doing it apparently.
well I had an email from BBC Alba wanting to use some of my photos today
I wouldn't hold my breath.
Rumours that Green has accepted the loss of five titles as part of the deal. Ally to walk if true?
The Herald saying that a TV deal is about to be signed if Rangers are accepted in the third, roughly the same money SPL would receive with Rangers in the SPL.
Last edited:
If it was Green he'll have even less (is that possible) fan support.
Perhaps the SPL have finally realised they need us if they want their TV money.
- Status