The rise of OnlyFans

He's judging women's values by their weight. Only he is using the word obese.

It's funny you laugh at others you perceive as judgemental. But not the guy attacking women for their weight.
You've already responded to me since yesterday, now you are pulling a reply to another user from yesterday, for what?
Why are you trying to actively put yourself to the top of this conversation, is it because you think your view is the right view? Grow up.

It's funny you laugh at others you perceive as judgemental. But not the guy attacking women for their weight.
Its funny? I find it incredibly disappointing that you have users who are extremely prejudice against people they have no idea who they are, what they are about, how the treat people. But people are happy to class them as losers, whores and much worse.

If you can pull a reply from 24 hours ago on me, you can call it out yourself, stop being a weirdo.
Its clear sex is too much of a mature discussion for you.

The difference is you don't care. Which is fair enough.
Difference is, I am not a prude.
Unlike a large amount of users on this forum.
 
Last edited:
When did I ever say this?

"I’ve heard losers try and tell me that they wouldn’t enter a relationship with a girl if she slept with them on the first date, funnily enough, the only people I’ve ever heard say that are not the kind of guys who get laid on a first date."

"The same men claim “I’d never date an OF girl” and then I see their obese ugly wife."
 
"I’ve heard losers try and tell me that they wouldn’t enter a relationship with a girl if she slept with them on the first date, funnily enough, the only people I’ve ever heard say that are not the kind of guys who get laid on a first date."

"The same men claim “I’d never date an OF girl” and then I see their obese ugly wife."

Good quotes of mine

Just like your assumptions that people who are happily married are simps and only with fat women.

But can you point out where in them I said all “people who are happily married are simps with only fat women”? Because what you’ve quoted clearly doesn’t say that.

Or shall we just ignore everything you post because you don’t have the reading comprehension to participate in discussions?
 
You've already responded to me since yesterday, now you are pulling a reply to another user from yesterday, for what?
Why are you trying to actively put yourself to the top of this conversation, is it because you think your view is the right view? Grow up.
You've wrote 30+ replies on this thread so you are in no position to lecture me. I think the "why are you trying to actively put yourself to the top of this conversation" is a question you should ask yourself. All you're doing is simping for hurf.

Its funny? I find it incredibly disappointing that you have users who are extremely prejudice against people they have no idea who they are, what they are about, how the treat people. But people are happy to class them as losers, whores and much worse.
It's funny because your main contribution to the thread is calling out judgemental people yet when hurf is being offensive to women you say nothing. You must be ok when women are called obese.

If you can pull a reply from 24 hours ago on me, you can call it out yourself, stop being a weirdo.
Its clear sex is too much of a mature discussion for you.
I've been around the sex industry, especially online for decades. I've seen your type of argument thousands of times.

It's you and hurf who keeps making it personal to people. If you both were mature neither of you would be dropping insults towards people in every post.

Difference is, I am not a prude.
Unlike a large amount of users on this forum.
You're too emotional to date an OF girl. Maybe you like the fantasy. But reality can be very different.

The moment someone posts something you don't like you can't control yourself so put the laughing emoji. What would you do if your OF gf had a favourite guy paying her money?
 
Good quotes of mine



But can you point out where in them I said all “people who are happily married are simps with only fat women”? Because what you’ve quoted clearly doesn’t say that.

Or shall we just ignore everything you post because you don’t have the reading comprehension to participate in discussions?

You was insinuating that. We are not kids here.
 
You've wrote 30+ replies on this thread so you are in no position to lecture me. I think the "why are you trying to actively put yourself to the top of this conversation" is a question you should ask yourself. All you're doing is simping for hurf.
Here we go, "simping for hurf", shows exactly your fault in that you cannot take in anyone else's view or opinion and have to stick to your own and push everyone elses counter view down as nonsense, simping etc.
Grow up, its pathetic.
I have read and understood other peoples views and agreed with them in places, all you care about is your own view and opinion and it has to be right.
Says more about you than anyone else here.

It's funny because your main contribution to the thread is calling out judgemental people yet when hurf is being offensive to women you say nothing. You must be ok when women are called obese.
Well thats not exactly true now is it, the context is completely missing as to why he said such a thing.
Keep acting a fool all you want or forget the context of how it was raised.
I had no problem with what he said, it was more of a pushback against the prude's in this topic to drive the point home that a majority with the harsh opinions, wont ever have the chance, let alone choice.

If you both were mature neither of you would be dropping insults towards people in every post
Fancy calling people simps and whores again? Or just going to ignore your own hypocrisy, over and over again.
Also, every post? Keep lying and maybe have a look at the people on your side of the table and their responses before marking us with those lies.

I've been around the sex industry, especially online for decades.
With your views on women, I severely doubt it.
More like you have been an avid watcher of porn for many years, speak to random men on chatrooms pretending to be women, never gained respect and only see them as an object.
Something doesn't add up, so I suspect some BS.

You're too emotional to date an OF girl. Maybe you like the fantasy. But reality can be very different.

The moment someone posts something you don't like you can't control yourself so put the laughing emoji. What would you do if your OF gf had a favourite guy paying her money?
I am emotional now because I can provide a counter? Comedy, maybe you should try understanding humans rather than just acting the closed minded fool.
Am I not allowed to laugh at idiotic views now? Sorry internet police, how many internet points do I lose today?

To answer your question, well user is paying money for content, she'll provide said content thats within her boundaries. If she wants to do that is her choice, I can choose to walk away if I dont like it.
Does her money help us go on holiday? Does it help us maintain our lifestyles? Whats the issue? She is not going off to sleep with them or have human interactions with them.

Oh the issue is your own prudish views and how you cant just get on your life, you have to tell everyone your views and tell everyone how negative and crappy other people are because of what they do for work. Got it.
 
Last edited:
ITT:
A whole lot of judgemental people shout at other judgemental people for being judgemental about people they think shouldn't be judged - while happily being judgemental themselves about other people that they consider fair game.

It's all very edifying.

PS: Screw you Chrome, I'm not taking that 'e' out, it looks stupid without it.
 
I don't get it, everyone is judgemental
Yes you are right, we are all judgemental, at different times for different reasons due to different experiences, knowledge etc etc.
I play judgemental when I am at work where I have hard boundaries of what is right and what is wrong.

When it comes down to humans and human nature/behaviours, we are all very different, all wired differently.
We all deserve a chance at life and how we want to live it, a majority of users in here disagree with this, because all other humans have to live within their boundaries of what they think is right or wrong.
 
Here we go, "simping for hurf", shows exactly your fault in that you cannot take in anyone else's view or opinion and have to stick to your own and push everyone elses counter view down as nonsense, simping etc.
Grow up, its pathetic.
I have read and understood other peoples views and agreed with them in places, all you care about is your own view and opinion and it has to be right.
Says more about you than anyone else here.
You're the one who won't accept the majority view.

I've accepted your view, even though I doubt it is your true feeling.

Well thats not exactly true now is it, the context is completely missing as to why he said such a thing.
Keep acting a fool all you want or forget the context of how it was raised.
I had no problem with what he said, it was more of a pushback against the prude's in this topic to drive the point home that a majority with the harsh opinions, wont ever have the chance, let alone choice.
He's posted the same view at least 3 times. The context is clear. He thinks a man with an obese wife would throw his marriage away for a date with an OF girl.

Fancy calling people simps and whores again? Or just going to ignore your own hypocrisy, over and over again.
Also, every post? Keep lying and maybe have a look at the people on your side of the table and their responses before marking us with those lies.
I've never called women whores. Out of us both you have implied they were.

I've called you a simp in an effort to snap you out of your delusion.

With your views on women, I severely doubt it.
More like you have been an avid watcher of porn for many years, speak to random men on chatrooms pretending to be women, never gained respect and only see them as an object.
Something doesn't add up, so I suspect some BS.
The reason you started on me was because I said I'd lose respect for a woman selling her underwear online out of desperation. That is because I don't want to see women having to do that. That is respecting women.

You and your buddy then started talking about OF girls having sex with randoms online and anyone who had a problem was a prude. Why did you jump to talking about them having sex?

To answer your question, well user is paying money for content, she'll provide said content thats within her boundaries. If she wants to do that is her choice, I can choose to walk away if I dont like it.
Does her money help us go on holiday? Does it help us maintain our lifestyles? Whats the issue? She is not going off to sleep with them or have human interactions with them.
You do know some women get paid money to go on holidays with their customers?

There is no laugh emojis in Barbados ;)

Oh the issue is your own prudish views and how you cant just get on your life, you have to tell everyone your views and tell everyone how negative and crappy other people are because of what they do for work. Got it.
As a racap on my views I've no problem with women doing OF material within reason. As long as it isn't under duress. I think in reality you'd have a bigger issue with it.

Many OF women who listen to the opinion you expouse of no downsides are now having trouble dating.


Also you better keep your OF membership secret because most regular women frown on it too.

 
There is a counter argument to that, which is that OF provides an outlet for frustrated guys that can't find what they're looking for in real life, so that it decreases women in the real world being seen as sex objects.
If that was true, rape would be almost non existent due to the explosion of porn on the internet.

I think the reverse is true in that it can feed/encourage that behaviour.

Edit: As an example I’ve heard some female streamers on twitch complain about men/boys coming into their streams expecting them to be OF girls and then being disrespectful when they find out that they aren’t.
 
Last edited:
He thinks a man with an obese wife would throw his marriage away for a date with an OF girl.
Welcome to reality, where old ugly men with a bit of money think they can pay for a date and pay for their way through life with an attractive young woman.
This is an issue with old men, not young women.

The reason you started on me was because I said I'd lose respect for a woman selling her underwear online out of desperation. That is because I don't want to see women having to do that. That is respecting women.
Here we go again about your respect and how that is more important than surviving for women. Cracking view mate.
We and others questioned your view on this as it came across really crappy and your views and responses have come across really crappy towards women a number of times. Or are you oblivious to that?

You and your buddy then started talking about OF girls having sex with randoms online and anyone who had a problem was a prude. Why did you jump to talking about them having sex?
Not really, I think you have really confused the conversation. It was following conversation or taking the conversation to deeper elements to drag a better response out of users.
You and others class OF girls as just one item, when there is very different levels to subscription site and model.

In dumb dumb terminology for you - some girls get naked, some girls shag other creators, some girls dont get naked, some girls do it with their partner only.
Hell some on OF are professional athletes using it as just a ploy for more money, not doing anything remotely sexual or seedy based.

You do know some women get paid money to go on holidays with their customers?
Well duhhh, quit trying to act like I'm a fool, its getting rather tiresome and is pathetic.
So I'll reply again with the below if you want to try again;
she'll provide said content thats within her boundaries. If she wants to do that is her choice, I can choose to walk away if I dont like it.
Does her money help us go on holiday? Does it help us maintain our lifestyles? Whats the issue?

As a racap on my views I've no problem with women doing OF material within reason. As long as it isn't under duress. I think in reality you'd have a bigger issue with it.
So again, you have no problem with women doing OF, unless it is to make money to ensure their own and families survival?
If they did it under those circumstances, you would lose respect for them, right?

Tell me again about my life and how I would do or find things without knowing anything about my actual life, its hilarious.

Many OF women who listen to the opinion you expouse of no downsides are now having trouble dating.
I dont remember ever saying women who go on OF wont ever have a downside to their dating.
Why are you making things up?
 
Even with evidence you keep replying lol.

Welcome to reality, where old ugly men with a bit of money think they can pay for a date and pay for their way through life with an attractive young woman.
This is an issue with old men, not young women.
Why mention the wife being obese? You're making yourself look dumb.

Here we go again about your respect and how that is more important than surviving for women. Cracking view mate.
We and others questioned your view on this as it came across really crappy and your views and responses have come across really crappy towards women a number of times. Or are you oblivious to that?
So if you hear of a woman being forced to sell sexual services you pat them on the back and say "great choice"?

Not really, I think you have really confused the conversation. It was following conversation or taking the conversation to deeper elements to drag a better response out of users.
You and others class OF girls as just one item, when there is very different levels to subscription site and model.
That is you assuming other people think like you, that sex and looks are the most valuable element of society. They aren't.

If you were consistent with your views you'd have been arguing against the assumption. But you didn't. You accepted it.

In dumb dumb terminology for you - some girls get naked, some girls shag other creators, some girls dont get naked, some girls do it with their partner only.
Hell some on OF are professional athletes using it as just a ploy for more money, not doing anything remotely sexual or seedy based.
I don't understand dumb dumb, just like you don't seem to understand basic points.

So again, you have no problem with women doing OF, unless it is to make money to ensure their own and families survival?
If they did it under those circumstances, you would lose respect for them, right?
I lose respect for someone who takes the easiest way out at the first opportunity.

The woman I was initially talking about didn't do anything. That is why I said the question was a thought exercise. But in order to answer it you had to be honest. But you want to act like you don't judge anyone, even though in most of your posts you do.
I dont remember ever saying women who go on OF wont ever have a downside to their dating.
Why are you making things up?

You've been arguing against anyone who expresses caution about the lifestyle and calling them judgemental.

You don't have to agree with a different opinion to acknowledge many people think like that.
 
He's judging women's values by their weight. Only he is using the word obese.

It's funny you laugh at others you perceive as judgemental. But not the guy attacking women for their weight.

I’ve already apologised for that, it was wrong of me, I should have just said ugly not ugly and obese.

Inside and out.
 
Back
Top Bottom