Soldato
Among other ray tracing issues on PC it looks like various ray traced reflection details get culled when using Nvidia Ansel, Ironic really considering it's meant to be for screenshots yet removes detail 
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The RT Related Games, Benchmarks, Software, Etc Thread.
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
- Status
Caporegime
Oh dear, not been able to test this game yet myself. Looks like it has a bug with Ryzen CPUs limiting performance.
Associate
If the consoles are using AMD CPUs how the hell can they screw up AMD performance 
Because contrary to popular belief there is no such thing as a "console port".If the consoles are using AMD CPUs how the hell can they screw up AMD performance
Last edited:
Soldato
Holy hell those FPS differences are insane, 81FPS on the 7700X and 160 on the 13900K... could it be a CPU scheduling issue ?
Must be something along those lines, sure it will be sorted soon.
If the consoles are using AMD CPUs how the hell can they screw up AMD performance
Haha. True.
I am sure a fix will be along soon. Could be a last minute cockup.
Soldato
Atomic Heart official specs as of today, Considering it's got a few RT FX these specs don't look that bad, Along with it being one of Nvidia's DLSS3 feature games it should be a decent experience.
Last edited:
Atomic Heart official specs as of today, Considering it's got a few RT FX these specs don't look that bad, Along with it being one of Nvidia's DLSS3 feature games it should be a decent experience.
Nice. Will be playing this on release. Based on those specs I should be fine.
It will if use ultra performance DLSSThat's probably without RT, not a chance this is running well on anything but a 4090
That's probably without RT, not a chance this is running well on anything but a 4090
No chance of it running well on the 3080 without RT as apparently the game wants 12gn vram even for 1080p low settings
Soldato
It's RAM: Google search:Atomic Heart: Minimum (60 fps, 1080p, low settings):
CPU: Intel Core i5 6500 or AMD Ryzen 3 1200. RAM: 8GB (12GB recommended) GPU: GeForce GTX 1060 or AMD Radeon RX 580.
Last edited:
RTX4090 loses 47% performance when enabling Ray Tracing
Intel Arc A770 loses 21% performance when enabling Ray Tracing
AMD RX7900XTX loses 88% performance when enabling Ray Tracing
Today I learned Intel has the best architecture for Ray Tracing, they just need to make bigger GPUs
Intel Arc A770 loses 21% performance when enabling Ray Tracing
AMD RX7900XTX loses 88% performance when enabling Ray Tracing
Today I learned Intel has the best architecture for Ray Tracing, they just need to make bigger GPUs
Last edited:
As posts go that is mince! 47% reduction of 10 million is much less than a 21% reduction of 5000! Obviously those figures were picked to demonstrate how stupid the post was.RTX4090 loses 47% performance when enabling Ray Tracing
Intel Arc A770 loses 21% performance when enabling Ray Tracing
AMD RX7900XTX loses 88% performance when enabling Ray Tracing
Today I learned Intel has the best architecture for Ray Tracing, they just need to make bigger GPUs
So news in, atomic heart won't have RT on consoles at launch.... 
Probably going to be a **** show too
In other news, what are peoples thoughts with the RT in hogswarts then? AO and shadows looks good but I'm finding the reflections to be a let down, some areas, it looks good but it feels/looks like SSR is still happening on top of RT (as can also see SSR artefacts e.g. halo'ing around edges and so on), that and then low resolution as well as having a shimmery/ant crawling effect (can be improved via file edits though but hits performance hard) and I'm finding that a lot of the dry brick like material are reflective when they shouldn't be, obviously marble surfaces should be reflective but not dry rough brick....
Probably going to be a **** show too In other news, what are peoples thoughts with the RT in hogswarts then? AO and shadows looks good but I'm finding the reflections to be a let down, some areas, it looks good but it feels/looks like SSR is still happening on top of RT (as can also see SSR artefacts e.g. halo'ing around edges and so on), that and then low resolution as well as having a shimmery/ant crawling effect (can be improved via file edits though but hits performance hard) and I'm finding that a lot of the dry brick like material are reflective when they shouldn't be, obviously marble surfaces should be reflective but not dry rough brick....
Associate
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Posts
- 1,202
Is there an element of RT being turned up to 11 to showcase it being used, instead of just using it effectively? It's strange if RT is being used for it to make things look worse in one game, but better in another.
Soldato
I think it just depends on how they implement it, Some do it well and others do it half assed.
- Status