• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The RX Vega 64 Owners Thread

yes i know how it works and what i said about temps is correct although i missed the rest of the combination out therefor if you have the room for it martinis statement is correct. p.s. it does the same thing exactly when resetting everything to default for me therefor the boost is as martini stated however if the thermals go up etc them the boost drops, again therefor max boost is 1632 or whatever number it was mentioned. officially mentioned or not thats the behavior.

Ok, let me ask one question before we continue this conversation. You are saying when you run your Vega 56 card in balance mode (Which is the default stock setting of Vega cards) Your card runs at 1632Mhz. Not just for the first couple of minutes, but, for your the majority of your gaming time?
 
Ok, let me ask one question before we continue this conversation. You are saying when you run your Vega 56 card in balance mode (Which is the default stock setting of Vega cards) Your card runs at 1632Mhz. Not just for the first couple of minutes, but, for your the majority of your gaming time?

I never said that it would run majority. I always made the stipulation it doesn't.
Being pedantic it doesn't run the 1546 stable.
 
Ok, let me ask one question before we continue this conversation. You are saying when you run your Vega 56 card in balance mode (Which is the default stock setting of Vega cards) Your card runs at 1632Mhz. Not just for the first couple of minutes, but, for your the majority of your gaming time?
i never said gaming, my screenshot clearly shows vegas pro, under stable conditions for the boost clock to be active.. but yes in default setting as described with vegas pro.
edit: i have also seen it in a few gaming scenarios whereby the volts are lowered and the clocks are stock, manual fan to.
I can throw a spanner in at this point by suggesting you can set min/max states on the p6 and p3 hbm for any of the 3 presets on AMD wattmatt software.
apologies i misunderstood your spanner :D
 
Last edited:
i never said gaming, my screenshot clearly shows vegas pro, under stable conditions for the boost clock to be active.. but yes in default setting as described with vegas pro.
edit: i have also seen it in a few gaming scenarios whereby the volts are lowered and the clocks are stock, manual fan to.

there is no load on the GPU. What is that supposed to prove?

And again, you are talking about custom settings, lowering the volts and manual fan.
 
there is no load on the GPU. What is that supposed to prove?

And again, you are talking about custom settings, lowering the volts and manual fan.
yes there is load on the gpu, look at it again... i can render it for you and get 100% load perfectly stable with the boost.
i am talking separately about the manual stuff in an edit to not confuse.

ok to clear any confusion scenario 1:
stock card, running as when received, will achieve boost of 1632 when rendering in vegas pro.

scenario 2:
voltage and fan adjusted card with stock clocks will achieve boost of 1632 in some games.


either way, it still proves the card does boost to 1632 in the right circumstances which was what and is still what martini is saying, the stock boost appears to actually be higher than advertised.
 
yes there is load on the gpu, look at it again... i can render it for you and get 100% load perfectly stable with the boost.
i am talking separately about the manual stuff in an edit to not confuse.

ok to clear any confusion scenario 1:
stock card, running as when received, will achieve boost of 1632 when rendering in vegas pro.

scenario 2:
voltage and fan adjusted card with stock clocks will achieve boost of 1632 in some games.


either way, it still proves the card does boost to 1632 in the right circumstances which was what and is still what martini is saying, the stock boost appears to actually be higher than advertised.

I am sorry, but, you have a Vega 56 card? And you are running it in default Balance mode with no changes? IF that is the case, how are you getting a boost of 1632? It's peak boost is 1592.

And, scenario 1: The picture shows the Vega card with barely any load and about 30 seconds after starting.

Scenario 2: Is custom settings. I know it will boost higher with adjustments to voltage and fan speed.

But, never mind that. Just do a simple test, put your card in the default, balanced mode and run heaven/superposition or some other benchmark for a while. Your card won't be running at 1532 nevermind 1632.

The boost clocks advertised are the ones that the card will actually do the work at. The card might spike up to that peak figure when there is very little load or at the beginning of a benchmark, but it won't stay there, because it's not designed to in stock settings. In fact, under load it probably won't even reach the advertised speeds.

IF you didn't know what the stock clocks were and there were no custom settings, what would you do to find out the clocks? Remember, those peak values were hidden by AMD when Vega was first released.
 
I never said that it would run majority. I always made the stipulation it doesn't.
Being pedantic it doesn't run the 1546 stable.

And, sorry again. But, this whole discussion started because you said that Vega's clocks were 1600+ and that you consider it underclocking only reaching 1600 Mhz in custom mode. Since you are running at 1600 all the time, that implies that you must think the stock clock is 1632 the majority of the time? How can it be stock clocks if it can't hold those clocks for the majority of the time?

The 1632 in default mode is a peak. It has something to do with the adaptive power scaling that Vega uses. It's room for the boost to jump up to. It's not the boost that the card runs at for the majority of the time.

And surely if you are running at higher frequency for the majority of time over the stock settings, that's an overclock?

You aren't been pedantic, you are been correct, the advertised stock speeds are best case scenario for AMD. Most reviews found they didn't reach those speeds.
 
I am sorry, but, you have a Vega 56 card? And you are running it in default Balance mode with no changes? IF that is the case, how are you getting a boost of 1632? It's peak boost is 1592.

And, scenario 1: The picture shows the Vega card with barely any load and about 30 seconds after starting.

Scenario 2: Is custom settings. I know it will boost higher with adjustments to voltage and fan speed.

But, never mind that. Just do a simple test, put your card in the default, balanced mode and run heaven/superposition or some other benchmark for a while. Your card won't be running at 1532 nevermind 1632.

The boost clocks advertised are the ones that the card will actually do the work at. The card might spike up to that peak figure when there is very little load or at the beginning of a benchmark, but it won't stay there, because it's not designed to in stock settings. In fact, under load it probably won't even reach the advertised speeds.

IF you didn't know what the stock clocks were and there were no custom settings, what would you do to find out the clocks? Remember, those peak values were hidden by AMD when Vega was first released.
you seem to be really failing to grasp this, so let me be more specific, i run undervolted normally but i changed it to the default settings just to test it out and hey presto does the same thing.... it does run at 1632 and 1532 no problem, albeit not for very long in the 1632 range, however it still does. i think you maybe are missing the point of this whole conversation.
 
anyway, time out you two!
Would a Vega 64 be a minor or significant upgrade to a Fury? I have a Freesync monitor and don't want to go over to team green.
 
anyway, time out you two!
Would a Vega 64 be a minor or significant upgrade to a Fury? I have a Freesync monitor and don't want to go over to team green.
Significant, 40-50% better performance give or take a few %.

When i tested on launch day my Vega 64 Liquid was 45% faster than my Radeon Pro Duo Liquid running in single GPU mode.
 
Excellent. Now I just need to wait patiently for them to become affordable :(
I'm hopeful they'll at least be back to launch prices soon
 
Last edited:
you seem to be really failing to grasp this, so let me be more specific, i run undervolted normally but i changed it to the default settings just to test it out and hey presto does the same thing.... it does run at 1632 and 1532 no problem, albeit not for very long in the 1632 range, however it still does. i think you maybe are missing the point of this whole conversation.

I asked you to do a simple test, change it to balanced mode, stress the card and show the clocks. My 1080ti boosts up to nearly 2300 for a while and sometimes spikes that high during gaming, but, nobody would say that 2300Mhz was the stock clocks.

I am not missing the point of the whole conversation, it started from this statement.

Well if it's not running its 1600MHZ+ stock then it's being underclocked, running at 1500MHZ is underclocked? Running the stock clocks 100% stable would be better than a sustained 1500MHZ.
 
How can 1546 be considered the stock clock then when it can't sustain it under default settings.

Pretty sure this is all pedantry based on what someone considers stock.

I never once said that 1632 was sustained at default settings. But default settings would also be referred to as stock settings.
 
I asked you to do a simple test, change it to balanced mode, stress the card and show the clocks. My 1080ti boosts up to nearly 2300 for a while and sometimes spikes that high during gaming, but, nobody would say that 2300Mhz was the stock clocks.

I am not missing the point of the whole conversation, it started from this statement.
you never asked me that at all, think you need to go back and reread the conversation. however i will post a pick tonight when i get home to show you with some load. no one said it was sustained in fact we all pointed out that with the correct temps etc it boosts that high, but i specifically said not in gaming.
 
anyway, time out you two!
Would a Vega 64 be a minor or significant upgrade to a Fury? I have a Freesync monitor and don't want to go over to team green.

I went from Fury to Vega 64 and it is a very nice upgrade indeed. I averaged 44% increase in FPS across my games before Christmas. Drivers should be even faster now.
 

again i never mentioned gaming :) go find the vegas pro quote.
clearly those clocks wont be maintained in gaming as the default 1546 clocks ant maintained due to poor high voltages and less than optimal fan control in a default setting.
again thats not the point.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom