fan curves ? doesn't one just stick 2x140mm fans on the heatsink and leave at 5 or 7v ?What fan curve is everyone running for their 3600's?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
fan curves ? doesn't one just stick 2x140mm fans on the heatsink and leave at 5 or 7v ?What fan curve is everyone running for their 3600's?
If that's the Vdimm then that's perfectly fine as that's the xmp specification.Built my new pc, ryzen 5 3600 with aorus extreme motherboard and ripped 8 pack ram.
Just hw monitor on and its reporting up to 1.45v is this normal?
If that's the Vdimm then that's perfectly fine as that's the xmp specification.
Decided to try a bit of basic overclocking leaving everything stock and seeing how far i can go on stock volts.
Prime Small FFTs stable for over an hour so far.
Boost uses upwards of 1.4v to get to 4.2ghz with load temps of nearly 80c.I don't get it all yet how is that stock if stock is 4.2 ghz ?
Ryzen Master is the only thing that reads voltages and core speeds correctly from what i've found.
Weird, maybe its a motherboard thing as it shows the correct voltages on my ASRock B450M Pro4I can never get Ryzen Master to give me the correct voltages when I set my values in Bios. The below shot is of me running Cinebench with an +0.186 Offset which should return a max of 1.28-1.29-something (1.1 + 0.186, right?) but it really doesn't matter what I set, it always stays at 1.09-1.1v in Ryzen Master:
If you're running a 3600 at standard stock settings does it make any difference if you have a b350,450 or the newer 550 board?
Precision Boost 2 might not be on the B350. From memory PBO definitely wasn't.
edit:
https://www.msi.com/blog/amd-ryzen-b350-vs-b450-chipset-difference
Just PBO it looks like.
Try the same test but with 1.3v and see if scores go up as it does seem low for 4.4 all core.Okay, I am probably doing this very very wrong, but....
If in ryzen master i set OC to manual.
Set voltage peak to 1.25, and then set all cores to max 4400
Leave all memory to auto (8pack 3600 @ c14)
I run cinebench while watching ryzenmaster values.
Temp doesn't go over 65degrees.
Cinebench returns a score of 3872
and during the run each core is reporting a max speed of 4399 in ryzen master.
my question is, are the values being reported by ryzen master accurate?
if it says cores are all peaking at 4399, are they?
obviously i'll have stability tests to run later, but is the rest of this accurate?
Okay, I am probably doing this very very wrong, but....
If in ryzen master i set OC to manual.
Set voltage peak to 1.25, and then set all cores to max 4400
Leave all memory to auto (8pack 3600 @ c14)
I run cinebench while watching ryzenmaster values.
Temp doesn't go over 65degrees.
Cinebench returns a score of 3872
and during the run each core is reporting a max speed of 4399 in ryzen master.
my question is, are the values being reported by ryzen master accurate?
if it says cores are all peaking at 4399, are they?
obviously i'll have stability tests to run later, but is the rest of this accurate?
Try the same test but with 1.3v and see if scores go up as it does seem low for 4.4 all core.