Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Feb 2018
- Posts
- 13,316
Top tier mental gymnastics there.
Right up your street then?
Top tier mental gymnastics there.
Right up your street then?
Top tier mental gymnastics there.
He has a point though. You're saying police officers on social media complain about workload and staffing levels, which they do. A bit of dancing while deployed to an event (or attending on a rest day/voluntarily, as many do) doesn't detract from those issues. Shifts aren't parading with a fraction of their normal staffing levels and specialist teams aren't being disbanded because the rest are off practising their macarena for the next LGBTQI parade.
It ultimately comes down to a balance between being participant and engaged with communities, versus giving critics one more thing to regularly regurgitate along with the "policing hurty words on twitter" and spending money painting rainbows on cars, and often under the guise of wanting police to be back policing again. It's all rather tiresome to those that have an understanding of the real issues that policing is facing, and entirely unproductive towards the supposed goal of freeing up officers to deal with actual crime. The amount of time being taken up dealing with mental health and social issues vastly outstrips the occasional jig.
But the thing with public order policing is you don't know until after the event whether the number of officers assigned was appropriate, based on how much trouble actually happened. The poor police get hammered if they don't assign enough officers and trouble happens, and now they are getting stick for sending officers who seemingly weren't necessary.
Any time wasted doing crap like that is nothing but time wasted. If you tot up the man hours then that resource could have been deployed elsewhere.
That's how we ended up with extremely low attendance of certain crimes and less police patrolling.
After all if they're not doing something that looks good on the statistics that means its a waste of time right.
Was any trouble missed? I don't know.
Sure, if they miss things. However, if they don't then, as another poster pointed out, they have done some Public Engagement while being posted unnecessarily (in hindsight) to an event. Better value for money or not worth the risk? I see both sides.But you were talking about what if's. This is the example of what if. What if something did happen and the police missed it or responded too slowly because they're too busy dancing? They are not there to dance. They are there to prevent crime and attend should one happen.
Sure, if they miss things. However, if they don't then, as another poster pointed out, they have done some Public Engagement while being posted unnecessarily (in hindsight) to an event. Better value for money or not worth the risk? I see both sides.
My mindset was changed when I read that the police are not here to protect us or to stop crime they are here to maintain the power of the state and enforce their power. Once you realise that everything makes sense.
I've not mentioned doing anything for the purpose of statistics.
You were calling it man hour inefficient.
A lot of what people think of as policing is wasted time yet bad feeling is generated when police don't make effort to waste time interacting with the public, being visible, attending 0% success chance crimescenes.
Because I and others have the capacity to hate them for their ludicrous and unprofessional stunts as wellWhy can't we just hate the police for their wild incompetence.....?
Your hate of the polce is showing...Absolutely, they spend more time on drug possession, and "hate speech" than they do on murder, theft and rape.
The police are their own worst enemy, they victimise communities and then wonder why they won't cooperate with them when it comes to real crimes where where is actually a victim.
Art imitating life.