This is why people are losing respect for the police...

Status
Not open for further replies.
I was in court last week and whilst waiting in the room I heard a conversation between solicitors saying "...and guess what, the officers camera was conveniently off again." like it's common place. (Paraphrasing from memory)
 
Last edited:
"in this day and age"... (they love that line) all Police should be wearing body worn cameras that they should not be allowed to turn off when reporting to an incident.
 
Malevolence said:
Amazing how all these race-baiting idiots don't seem to know what cameras are or how they work.
Click to expand...

Or they don't care because they know that the truth doesn't matter. That's the beauty of propaganda built on fashionable irrational prejudices - enough people will believe it without question and it will get enough media coverage. On top of that, there's the delay. By the time people who care about the truth investigate and evaluate the evidence, they're too late. The incident is already firmly bedded in as "proof" for the desired irrational prejudice. And it's old news anyway.
 
The1nonly1 said:
"in this day and age"... (they love that line) all Police should be wearing body worn cameras that they should not be allowed to turn off when reporting to an incident.
Click to expand...

AFAIK this is how most US states BWV works.

The moment its taken out the charging dock when they get on duty it starts recording, and only stops when its put back to charge and upload the data.

Its how it should be here, no excuses then for evidence mysteriously vanishing.
 
Dis86 said:
www.mylondon.news

Met Police officer who punched man, 70, in the face was 'hit first'

Body camera footage revealed that the pensioner hit the officer in the face so hard he temporarily lost his vision
www.mylondon.news www.mylondon.news

Attempted race-grift fail.
Click to expand...

Malevolence said:
Amazing how all these race-baiting idiots don't seem to know what cameras are or how they work.
Click to expand...

Ive read the article a few times and cant find any mention towards race baiting unless you have looked at the guys name and decided he was black so that is what it must be.

I would have thought the 2 stories below would be some of the reasons people are losing respct for the police.

www.theguardian.com

Met police officer charged with two counts of rape

PC Rupert Edwards charged in relation to alleged incidents in south London and Surrey in August and September
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...

www.theguardian.com

Woman accuses police of excessive force against her black sons at London station

Two brothers, aged 13 and 15, were arrested at Shortlands station after one of them failed to produce an Oyster card
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...

Try to ignore that these two kids are black for a second.




jpaul said:
sounds like Meghan and Harry appropriating stephen lawrence / coomonwealth slavery heritage ....
Click to expand...

WTF has this got to do with this thread?
 
Last edited:
Tony Edwards said:
Ive read the article a few times and cant find any mention towards race baiting unless you have looked at the guys name and decided he was black so that is what it must be.

I would have thought the 2 stories below would be some of the reasons people are losing respct for the police.





Try to ignore that these two kids are black for a second.






WTF has this got to do with this thread?
Click to expand...

Try reading it again. There's an entire paragraph.
 
Dis86 said:
Just read that on BBC news. Absolutely insane.
Click to expand...

So reading it some more its going to include looking at someone. Because lets face it someone "staring" at you is very subjective, and different people will have different thresholds of what would be considered staring, and of course what about those with medical conditions who cannot help it. Lock them up for 2 years also. This is a blatant power grab at the freedoms of people in this country and it's almost exclusively targetted at men only.

The included offenses are:

  • Deliberately walking closely behind someone as they walk home at night
  • Making obscene or aggressive comments towards a person
  • Making obscene or offensive gestures towards a person
  • Obstructing a person's path
  • Driving or riding a vehicle slowly near to a person making a journey
So the next time your walking along and someone gets in your way, they are a criminal, and if they call you a naughty word, they are also a criminal. This is just beyond words mental.
 
Last edited:
Dis86 said:
People losing respect for the police based on claims of abuse of power/racism that didn't happen.
Come on Tony, keep up.
Click to expand...

But you are not making sense.

This might have been a better example.

MadMossy said:
So reading it some more its going to include looking at someone. Because lets face it someone "staring" at you is very subjective, and different people will have different thresholds of what would be considered staring, and of course what about those with medical conditions who cannot help it. Lock them up for 2 years also. This is a blatant power grab at the freedoms of people in this country and it's almost exclusively targetted at men only.

The included offenses are:

  • Deliberately walking closely behind someone as they walk home at night
  • Making obscene or aggressive comments towards a person
  • Making obscene or offensive gestures towards a person
  • Obstructing a person's path
  • Driving or riding a vehicle slowly near to a person making a journey
So the next time your walking along and someone gets in your way, they are a criminal, and if they call you a naughty word, they are also a criminal. This is just beyond words mental.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom