Nope, but the vast majority of UK terrorists are Muslim.
This is why people are losing respect for the police...
- Thread starter RossGReds
- Start date
- Status
Nope, but the vast majority of UK terrorists are Muslim.
Your post implied that the people in the video are terrorists.
It's quite sad to read this but unsurprising.
Absolutely not. However, according to wikipedia, since 2005, almost all terrorist attacks in the Uk have been undertaken by Islamist's. Spin that however which way you like.
List of terrorist incidents in Great Britain - Wikipedia
Last edited:
They weren't burning last night either, police were filmed just randomly picking out people from a crowd just standing there. They even tried to arrest a GBN jurno and had to immediately unarrest him.
It means there are clearly major issues out there with terrorist groups/fanatics/radicalism.
It doesn't mean that mosques deserve to be smashed in when a bloke from Cardiff stabs kids. Nor does it mean all Muslims are responsible for terrorism.
Are all English people responsible for the people who attacked the police in Southport and set fire to the police van?
It won't be for decades. It'll be over 1 or 2 elections. There is a battle for the right wing vote, just like what happened between the NF and BNP. One party declines as another party rises.
The "far right" are cannibalising the Conservative vote.
People, maybe Starmer too, are living in the past.
At each election millions more people are voting for the "far right". Eventually people are going to have to start to take the concerns seriously.
The last election was about the rise of Reform UK. I underestimated think size of their victory.
If Starmer isn't careful Labour are going to have a white problem to add to the Jewish and Muslim problems.
That's been covered in the thread already.
And yes a police van was set on fire yesterday. Some on here thought the violence was justified, because of immigration.
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 7,134
The first group.
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 May 2007
- Posts
- 9,084
- Location
- Surrey
Wow. This country really is ******.
You don't understand the term 'most likely' do you?
Well played
It certainly does. However twotierkier comes out today prattling on about a non existing "Far right"
100% agree on both points. However, when almost all terror atrocities are carried out by muslims people start getting narked especially when the focus is always on this supposed "far right".
Of course not, but when a minority in that crowd were responsible, it does not help when Starmer paints them all as "far right"
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 May 2007
- Posts
- 9,084
- Location
- Surrey
Are you guys seriously complaining about painting a 'minority of crowd' as far right, yet you're quite happy to lump every Muslim in with terrorists?
That's incredibly hypocritical.
That's incredibly hypocritical.
Please quote which guys have lumped all muslims in with terrorists.
![[FnG]magnolia](/styles/overclockers/avatars/9.png){kind=avatar}
Caporegime
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 28,727
- Location
- Auckland
My God but you guys are tiring and trying in equal measure. What a dumpster fire this thread is.
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 May 2007
- Posts
- 9,084
- Location
- Surrey
I asked which group of rioting/protesting people were a bigger public risk. Dis said Muslims. You agreed.
His explanation was based on most of the recent terrorist activity being completed by Muslims.
Whilst that statement is true, the argument was poor, based on the fact that the terrorist bombings were mostly conducted by radical individuals, not crowds or groups of people as the question asked. You agreed with his explanation.
I called you both out as hypocrites because you think it's unfair that a crowd is being labelled as far right/extreme, when it appears you did exactly the same thing with a Muslim crowd.
Last edited:
Don't worry yourself with who liked who's post or whatever. My question to you was which guys lumped all muslims in with terrorists?
After you said.
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 May 2007
- Posts
- 9,084
- Location
- Surrey
Dis stated that a Muslim group is more dangerous than a white group, based on his statement that reads 'terrorist individuals have been Muslims, therefore a group of Muslims poses the biggest public risk .'
By tarring the entire group based on the actions of a small number of it's potential members, you have inadvertently lumped everyone in, and are treating them, as terrorists.
It doesn't matter what it "reads like". That's only your misguided perception of a group of words.
Quote me who lumped all muslims in with terrorists. If you cannot, then retract your stupid statement, take it on the chin and get on with your life. I'm getting up at 8 to take my son and daughters swimming.
- Status