Poll: This Johnny Depp Stuff

[mrk]

That was years ago, he didn't have as much stuff going on?

If the kid is his, fair enough... But after all this, I can't see him donating/pledging a single dollar to her. He hasn't even said anything about the whole case considering he was mentioned in the trial numerous times.

 

[dlockers]

Didn't he forget the name of his crazily named kid the other day?

 

[dowie]

I don't quite understand the point here re: "didn't have much stuff going on", he's a workaholic billionaire worth 200 billion, that doesn't negate his ability to instruct an assistant or private banker to send funds.

He donated to ACLU in 2018, back when he had plenty of stuff going on with Tesla/sleeping at the factory and after he'd broken up with her, he didn't need to do any of that.

 

[mrk]

It remains to be seen...

 

[UberTiger]

First response to that:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1532755489708204034

Ha, that original video has 91% dislikes, currently at roughly 147k dislikes. Her responses were terrible.

 

[mrk]

 

[UberTiger]

I've not watched aquaman, but that was a whole lot of desert and land scenes for a movie that I thought was about a bloke who lived in the ocean

 

[Chuk_Chuk]

First response to that:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1532755489708204034

That's even worst. At least in the first video it just comes across as a meme insult rather than a question because of the way it is edited.

In the full length video where it includes him asking the actual question, she spends 20 second on pointless rambling as her brain tries to formulate an answer. She then spends 5 seconds giving a non answer to the question and then spends 20 seconds blaming other factors.

If this was supposed to be in defense of her then congratulations, you've just scored an own goal.

 

[dlockers]

That's even worst. At least in the first video it just comes across as a meme insult rather than a question because of the way it is edited.

In the full length video where it includes him asking the actual question, she spends 20 second on pointless rambling as her brain tries to formulate an answer. She then spends 5 seconds giving a non answer to the question and then spends 20 seconds blaming other factors.

If this was supposed to be in defense of her then congratulations, you've just scored an own goal.

I thought the same.

 

[VincentHanna]

That's even worst. At least in the first video it just comes across as a meme insult rather than a question because of the way it is edited.

In the full length video where it includes him asking the actual question, she spends 20 second on pointless rambling as her brain tries to formulate an answer. She then spends 5 seconds giving a non answer to the question and then spends 20 seconds blaming other factors.

If this was supposed to be in defense of her then congratulations, you've just scored an own goal.

Why would I want to defend her?

Just pointing out the video was edited.

 

[Longbow]

Just pointing out the video was edited.

You mean Patrick Bateman wasn't there in studio and a pair of black sunglasses didn't fly out of nowhere and land on the guys face?

 

[mrk]

Huh I missed this, these maniacs went after Judy the court stenographer! Such a sweet lady.

 

[jpaul]

wait a couple of weeks until the jurors or their friends social media use reveals that they were unduly influenced in their decision by armchair lawyers - would be good grounds for the defence ... the urge to share is too strong/instinctive.

 

[Bigpig]

You mean Patrick Bateman wasn't there in studio and a pair of black sunglasses didn't fly out of nowhere and land on the guys face?

I was very disappointed that there was no emotional damage guy sound clip :/

 

[Bigpig]

wait a couple of weeks until the jurors or their friends social media use reveals that they were unduly influenced in their decision by armchair lawyers - would be good grounds for the defence ... the urge to share is too strong/instinctive.

Will be very hard to appeal this.

Her small damages win will work against her also.

Also I very much think Johnny thought he couldn't win this but just wanted to get information out.

 

[MadMossy]

He didn't think he would win because of how skewered the legal system is vs men when it comes to any sort of DV. I honestly think if AH hadn't over exaggerated her claims and just kept to the basics using the "evidence" she had, she would have won it easily.

If she hadn't tried to inflate the claims and focused on the evidence she did have, she may well have succeeded. Instead though she repeatidly escalated her claims getting more and more violent as the trial went on culminating in involuntary relations with broken bottles, and not requiring any medical treatment after.

Then you get an influx of people who are still backing her, making obsurd claims yet they have not watched the trial and have not seen ALL of the evidence. Just jumping on the bandwagon because it's a man. Sod misogyny, this is blatant misandry and its getting ridiculous now.

 

[Bigpig]

Kinda amusing that her lawyer is blaming social media.

When Amber Turd and her PR team have been using it and large mainstream media to attack Johnny for years?

What's Johnny have? A few friends and a couple of small youtubers?

 

[RoboCod]

Kinda amusing that her lawyer is blaming social media.

When Amber Turd and her PR team have been using it and large mainstream media to attack Johnny for years?

What's Johnny have? A few friends and a couple of small youtubers?

A pretty huge online fan base to be fair but yes you're right, it's hypocritical that they're blaming SM

 

[[FnG]magnolia]

So I think that makes it 1 - 1 and Amber to serve, yes?

 

[MadMossy]

Ofcourse she will appeal and it will get thrown out, which she will then take to a different court and lose again, as a person that is incapable of accepting responsibility she will never stop until she wins or is financially ruined.

Although technically its is 1 - 0 to Depp, she wasn't the defendant in the UK case. The Sun newspaper were, she was just a witness.