• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Threadripper on Zen+ 32 Cores - Launching Q3 2018

Permabanned
Joined
2 Sep 2017
Posts
10,490
Well I am really hoping that they do a 2950X, not just the 2970X, and 2990X. It does look great though, almost as fast a 10x 3770's or 7.75x 4770K's:)

This so called "glue" is an engineering masterpiece, a miracle by a genius who deserves an award as big as Nobel prize...

10 times 3770s or 7.75 times 4700Ks is roughly 650W, the 2990X consumes only 250W, with a plan to decrease it significantly (say ~50%) with the 7nm process next year.
Next year, say hi to 32 cores at 130-140W, it will be game over for Intel.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
30 Jul 2004
Posts
2,836
Location
Auckland
Interesting... a quick google for a 1950x at 4.1ghz scores 3413 (happy for someone here to corroborate or add some accuracy) points so scoring 6351 on the 32 core with the 4 modules instead of 2 is scaling very well. (Only a 7% drop in multicore IPC for doubling the number of CCX's)

Of course if you are going to put that 28 core intel monster under a phase change and use it at 5.0ghz it will take the ultimate crown. Intel will have to be talking very fast to make that a story people will buy into though.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Posts
7,071
If the lowest SKU is a 16 core part it is still going to be expensive. Cheaper than an Intel equivalent but entry into the platform won't be as easy. Hopefully further down the line they produce an 8 core too, unless the new 16 core is priced like the current 8 core but I doubt that.

I like the flexibility of the HEDT platform but don't need all those cores. It would be nice to have all those lanes and premium motherboards at the top end of the mainstream.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
30 Jul 2004
Posts
2,836
Location
Auckland
Thanks Matt - so on the engineering sample leaks we are seeing what an 8% overhead switching to a 4 ccx layout routing through 4 DDR channels. That is seriously special sauce.
 
Associate
Joined
28 Jan 2003
Posts
2,379
Location
Bristol
If the lowest SKU is a 16 core part it is still going to be expensive. Cheaper than an Intel equivalent but entry into the platform won't be as easy. Hopefully further down the line they produce an 8 core too, unless the new 16 core is priced like the current 8 core but I doubt that.

I like the flexibility of the HEDT platform but don't need all those cores. It would be nice to have all those lanes and premium motherboards at the top end of the mainstream.

I'd imagine there will be lower, the 1900x was never pushed on threadripper launch but it did exist and was the fastest clocked Ryzen you could buy, I am hoping for the same after all the fanfare a 2900x or 2920x drops, assuming the clocks and boosting are as good as 2700x.
 
Permabanned
Joined
2 Sep 2017
Posts
10,490
I can't wait for the reviews and the lineup prices.

The good thing about these new second-gen Threadrippers is that they will do gaming in the meanwhile by the way, in the background, and the user will still have large amount of spare cores to utilize for some other heavy compute.
 
Permabanned
Joined
2 Sep 2017
Posts
10,490
Ryzen Threadripper 2990X at 3.0GHz base/3.7GHz boost in 3DMark database https://www.techpowerup.com/245570/amd-ryzen-threadripper-2990x-makes-an-appearance-on-3dmark

and with the price tag of €1510:

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X 32 Core, 64 Thread Behemoth X399 HEDT CPU To Cost Around $1500 US – Listed By Retailer, Wrecks the i9-7980XE in Price Per Core, Price Per Performance Metrics

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X Flagship CPU Listed Online, Features Price Close To $1500 US – Bye Bye Core i9-7980XE, More Cores For Much Less Than Intel’s Current Flagship
https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-threadripper-2990x-cpu-price-1500-usd-leak/
 
Back
Top Bottom