• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Titan V announced £2700 15TF 12nm Volta

Kaapstad said:
Has anyone had much success overclocking the cache?

As to overclocking the memory mine CPU can only handle around 3733mhz and the memory I have installed is good for over 3866mhz so not even running full speed.
Click to expand...

I got cache running at 31 with 1.007 volts manual though not yet tried dropping lower or smashing in the very hard synthetics (aside from Realbench). I believe that a very good number, but think we both have 4.6 GHz binned chips so imagine you should get similar. Not sure what the upper limit to daily voltage is though for these and asked a question as such on OCN so not tried pushing higher yet.

But yeah, seems to me that right now either way with additional GPU's even running at higher clock speeds + RAM + Cache, the numbers will still lag X99 on the Graphics score. Nearly a 7k delta on graphics score when running a Trio when comparing my 5960x @ 4.7 GHz / Cache at 42 and the 7980XE @ 4.8 GHz / Mesh at 31 and RAM the same on both at 3000 MHz (i need better RAM :D)
 
Radox-0 said:
I got cache running at 31 with 1.007 volts manual though not yet tried dropping lower or smashing in the very hard synthetics (aside from Realbench). I believe that a very good number, but think we both have 4.6 GHz binned chips so imagine you should get similar. Not sure what the upper limit to daily voltage is though for these and asked a question as such on OCN so not tried pushing higher yet.

But yeah, seems to me that right now either way with additional GPU's even running at higher clock speeds + RAM + Cache, the numbers will still lag X99 on the Graphics score. Nearly a 7k delta on graphics score when running a Trio when comparing my 5960x @ 4.7 GHz / Cache at 42 and the 7980XE @ 4.8 GHz / Mesh at 31 and RAM the same on both at 3000 MHz (i need better RAM :D)
Click to expand...


Most samples will top out at 3.3Ghz, 3Ghz is the sweet spot for voltage at around what you're using (my 7940X needs around 1.05v however I'm clocking DRAM much higher than you which can negate the voltage required for stability). If wanting a quick fire way to test cache stability use HCI memtest pro or AIDA64 cache routine
 
Silent_Scone said:
Most samples will top out at 3.3Ghz, 3Ghz is the sweet spot for voltage at around what you're using (my 7940X needs around 1.05v however I'm clocking DRAM much higher than you which can negat the voltage required for stability). If wanting a quick fire way to test cache stability use HCI memtest pro or AIDA64 cache routine
Click to expand...

Cheer's will give AIDA a shot later on, trying to work on my RAM at the moment as expect there is a fair bit of performance I can extract there.

What sort of voltages is needed around 3.3 GHz mark. Obviously given the silicon lottery, I may as well ask the length of a string, but more curious as to the sort of limits for daily voltages for the Mesh over a longer term. Right now dialing in my daily clocks profile.
 
Silent_Scone said:
Most samples will top out at 3.3Ghz, 3Ghz is the sweet spot for voltage at around what you're using (my 7940X needs around 1.05v however I'm clocking DRAM much higher than you which can negate the voltage required for stability). If wanting a quick fire way to test cache stability use HCI memtest pro or AIDA64 cache routine
Click to expand...

Radox-0 said:
I got cache running at 31 with 1.007 volts manual though not yet tried dropping lower or smashing in the very hard synthetics (aside from Realbench). I believe that a very good number, but think we both have 4.6 GHz binned chips so imagine you should get similar. Not sure what the upper limit to daily voltage is though for these and asked a question as such on OCN so not tried pushing higher yet.

But yeah, seems to me that right now either way with additional GPU's even running at higher clock speeds + RAM + Cache, the numbers will still lag X99 on the Graphics score. Nearly a 7k delta on graphics score when running a Trio when comparing my 5960x @ 4.7 GHz / Cache at 42 and the 7980XE @ 4.8 GHz / Mesh at 31 and RAM the same on both at 3000 MHz (i need better RAM :D)
Click to expand...

Thanks guys.:)

I just gave the cache 1.005v and 30 on the multi.

Used a safe overclock on the GPU and still got my best Firestrike score on the first try.

I really appreciate what 8 Pack is doing with binning these CPUs as he guarantees 4.6 but they are good for 4.8 or more.

Score 31 343

With NVIDIA Titan V(1x) @1972/1000

And Intel Core i9-7980XE @4.8

Graphics Score 35 281

Physics Score 36 697

Combined Score 15 246

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/23975989?
 
I went for a retail boxed 7940 in the end, undelidded it will do 4.8 bench stable and 4.7 24/7 (non AVX)

Memory latency will really help with Firestrike CPU test but likely not so much with MGPU scaling. I think there's a few red herrings with this one but the main culprit is likely on NVIDIA's side for X299

Radox-0 said:
Cheer's will give AIDA a shot later on, trying to work on my RAM at the moment as expect there is a fair bit of performance I can extract there.

What sort of voltages is needed around 3.3 GHz mark. Obviously given the silicon lottery, I may as well ask the length of a string, but more curious as to the sort of limits for daily voltages for the Mesh over a longer term. Right now dialing in my daily clocks profile.
Click to expand...

Don't exceed 1.2v. If it's only for benching then you're not really hammering it with too much current, but it's not a rail you want to be juicing too hard.
 
Titan V review

https://hothardware.com/reviews/nvidia-titan-v-volta-gv100-gpu-review?page=1

I am shocked to see Titan V system power consumption 387W stock, 424W OC in games and 206W stock, 224W OC in mining, Volta's monster 815mm2 chip is far more energy efficiency than Vega 64 that is twice slower at mining and consumed around 400W stock or 500W-600W OC.

If Titan V undervolted then it probably consumed as little as 150W stock in mining could still get about 69MH/s or about 82MH/s at 170W OC.

Damn impressive. :cool:

Poor Vega.

Miners will absolutely love Volta and dump Vega cards to save energy by cut down huge energy bills.
 
Wrinkly said:
Or maybe you would appreciate the value of money more.

If you have some real use for the card, fair enough, but spending 3K on a graphics card to play console ports is not a wise decission.

AMD are in a great price / performance spot when you include the monitor tech. Something they tried to educate people on at the launch of Vega.
(says me, with a 1080Ti FTW3 :p)
Click to expand...

Educate? It was a desperate attempt to justify the OTT pricing. The majority of people still waiting on Vega at that time were doing so because they had Freesync monitors already.
 
Wrinkly said:
Or maybe you would appreciate the value of money more.

If you have some real use for the card, fair enough, but spending 3K on a graphics card to play console ports is not a wise decission.

AMD are in a great price / performance spot when you include the monitor tech. Something they tried to educate people on at the launch of Vega.
(says me, with a 1080Ti FTW3 :p)
Click to expand...
Games aren't ported from consoles.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom