Titanic submersible confirmed destroyed with loss of all five souls onboard.

Soldato
Joined
22 Dec 2006
Posts
8,893
Location
Around Town
You'd think would have multiple methods to send signal if one didn't work? Or technology hasn't advanced enough ? in that case more reason not to do it :( till more advances are found
It ain't got no seats a tiny window...next to a makeshift-like toilet steered by a Xbox controller
High risk travel...was the name not a clue
Don’t be Rich making Poor decisions!
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Dec 2014
Posts
5,818
Location
Midlands
This whole rescue is a bit of an embarrassment for the US. If they can't find something that wants to be found what hope would they have from an adversary. The Co-founder and Chairman, Horizon Maritime Services said they had the best equipment in the world yesterday. Seems like a bunch of bs peddlers now.

Easier to rescue someone from space, than from 4Km deep in the ocean, being at those sorts of depths is probably one of the most helpless and dangerous places you can go on earth.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
4 Jul 2008
Posts
26,442
Location
(''\(';.;')/'')
This whole rescue is a bit of an embarrassment for the US. If they can't find something that wants to be found what hope would they have from an adversary. The Co-founder and Chairman, Horizon Maritime Services said they had the best equipment in the world yesterday. Seems like a bunch of bs peddlers now.
wat

You have no idea how big and deep the ocean truly is, do you?
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Apr 2014
Posts
29,986
Location
Chadsville
This whole rescue is a bit of an embarrassment for the US. If they can't find something that wants to be found what hope would they have from an adversary. The Co-founder and Chairman, Horizon Maritime Services said they had the best equipment in the world yesterday. Seems like a bunch of bs peddlers now.

Considering what it's equipped with, there's an argument to be made that it doesn't want to be found if something goes wrong.

You can have the best equipment in the world but the task at hand can still be insurmountable.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Jan 2018
Posts
14,888
Location
Hampshire
If I was betting I'd still be betting that it was some catastrophic failure at the point they lost contact. Has always made the most sense. And would be the best outcome to find now.
You would think the US navy was listening to the ocean anyway to detect subs etc, they would have detected an implosion if it occurred? Maybe. Not that they'd tell us though.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Dec 2014
Posts
5,818
Location
Midlands
You would think the US navy was listening to the ocean anyway to detect subs etc, they would have detected an implosion if it occurred? Maybe. Not that they'd tell us though.

An ex Navy Admiral was saying on Sky yesterday, that just being within the vicinity of the Titanic will result in you hearing lots of clunks and bangs, apparently the wreck is constantly moving, bits are falling off it, the wreck itself makes a lot of noise.
 

SPG

SPG

Soldato
Joined
28 Jul 2010
Posts
10,388
See the titanic, like out of a window, only from a tv screen… they could have just done that from the boat above and not put themselves at risk!

This was our conclusion at work yesterday (Some top engineering was done, by some some top automotive engineers)

So we need to kickstart a ship capable of launching ROV`s lets say 8, We get 8 people with more money than sense to pay for a 4 week expedition to the site of the titanic (sea sickness and all) Stick them shipping container for 2 days and let them pilot the ROVs with some 8k TVs on the walls to let them zoom about and look at stuff from a big boat that sunk. We can have people pay extra for the ROV that can pick up a plate or something.
 
Caporegime
Joined
20 May 2007
Posts
39,928
Location
Surrey
You would think the US navy was listening to the ocean anyway to detect subs etc, they would have detected an implosion if it occurred? Maybe. Not that they'd tell us though.

I think the depths this thing was going to were far below the capability of any military sub.
 
Caporegime
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Posts
32,773
Location
Llaneirwg
You would think the US navy was listening to the ocean anyway to detect subs etc, they would have detected an implosion if it occurred? Maybe. Not that they'd tell us though.

No idea. Maybe it wouldn't be picked up. Maybe it would be similar to background noise.

Id assume they'd have found the craft by now if it had an issue and still be intact. I assume it would be very near the titanic and thus not too hard to find.
 
Caporegime
Joined
22 Oct 2002
Posts
27,532
Location
Boston, Lincolnshire
You'd think would have multiple methods to send signal if one didn't work? Or technology hasn't advanced enough ? in that case more reason not to do it :( till more advances are found

I think it most likely did so if it went dark you either have a complete power failure or the thing got crushed like a crisp packet.

I am 100% sure the people who built this thing know exactly what happened already.

If the sub had different forms of communication and were all on the same power source then you have the plausible conclusion that the thing could have lost all power. If each form of communication was on a different power source or even switchable power source then an implosion seems far more likely. This is all theory and conjecture obviously but once you know how the thing is built you can put together a picture quite easily. At least I would hope so.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
12 Mar 2006
Posts
16,461
Location
In The Sea Of Leveraged Liquidity
GXbUSdQ.png

as if thats real
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Oct 2007
Posts
12,133
Location
London, UK
This whole rescue is a bit of an embarrassment for the US. If they can't find something that wants to be found what hope would they have from an adversary. The Co-founder and Chairman, Horizon Maritime Services said they had the best equipment in the world yesterday. Seems like a bunch of bs peddlers now.

A tiny object not moving or making noise on the bottom of the ocean at depths no military submarines work at hardly compares to a Russian/Chinese navy submarine that could be a threat does it. What a stupid comment.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Aug 2005
Posts
3,636
Still can't believe people would actually pay to go on that expedition given everything that has come to light. No way am i paying £200k with something controlled by a Xbox controller.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Feb 2007
Posts
12,878
Location
London
This whole rescue is a bit of an embarrassment for the US. If they can't find something that wants to be found what hope would they have from an adversary. The Co-founder and Chairman, Horizon Maritime Services said they had the best equipment in the world yesterday. Seems like a bunch of bs peddlers now.

Well when it comes to an adversary, any enemy sub doesn't operate at the depths at play here, think its something like between 600-1000 metres, where as the titanic is around 3800 metres.
 
Back
Top Bottom