And if you exclude suicide?
Typically its a 50/50 split in the states.
And if you exclude suicide?
Maybe you should stop being controlled by the UK media telling you what to be outraged at?
Israel did have a problem with school shootings so they did something about it.
And if you exclude suicide?
Israel did have a problem with school shootings so they did something about it. But that was all in pre-internet days. Like 1974 - the Ma'a lot massacre.
As for arming teachers, from here:
Note point 2.
Doesnt matter what you loon take on it is, firearms are ruining the US.
Not strictly true, there are many many gun owners that are responsible normal people, however, there are some that are idiots that ruin it for the rest...
This sums it up well.
BARE - The Constitution | Americans should start by reading a thesaurus. | By Jim Jefferies | Facebook
Americans should start by reading a thesaurus.fb.watch
Why would you exclude suicide by firearm from firearm death statistics? That makes no sense at all.
how do you know?Because those suicides would be suicides by other means.
Except that the US, like most countries spends an absolute fortune on trying to prevent all of the above...Vehicles are heavily regulated and have an ever increasing number of safety features whilst the drivers have to prove they're able to operate at a minimum level of competency (with checks every few years), falls are investigated and things like building regulations changed to try and reduce them, poisonings lead to things like improved safety features on their containers, education about the risks and where possible alternatives found and the dangerous chemicals either withdrawn completely or heavily regulated to for example people with a licence and need for them.For some context on how low that number is -
US Deaths in 2020:
42,000 killed by falls
40,500 killed in vehicle accidents
87,000 killed accidental poisioning
So gun deaths have a way to go yet before they get high enough to be called a "problem" in the US, irrespective of our feelings about it.
Figures from the National Centre for Health Statistics which is part of the CDC - https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/accidental-injury.htm
Because those suicides would be suicides by other means.
Not all, and possibly not even most of them.Because those suicides would be suicides by other means.
Uh?So gun deaths have a way to go yet before they get high enough to be called a "problem" in the US
As usual, unqualified rubbish...
far less likely to be survivable than most other methods of suicide
16,604 so far this year. Last two years have been a fairly static 20k gun murders, 24k gun suicides.And if you exclude suicide?
All of which require far more effort than picking up the gun you, or a family member own...No. I've known too many people who have committed suicide - one a childhood friend - and not one of them used a gun.
Jumping off high bridges works far better than guns; hitting water from a sufficient height is much like hitting concrete. Your chances of surviving stepping out in front of a tube train depend not on luck but on which end of the platform you choose. Etc.
Last two years have been a fairly static 20k gun murders, 24k gun suicides.
No. I've known too many people who have committed suicide - one a childhood friend - and not one of them used a gun.
Jumping off high bridges works far better than guns; hitting water from a sufficient height is much like hitting concrete. Your chances of surviving stepping out in front of a tube train depend not on luck but on which end of the platform you choose. Etc.
That doesn't pass the 'So what?' test. You're not convincing anyone with 'X is smaller than Y, therefore X is not a real problem.'