It's these sorts of silly sound bites which everyone thinks sound great, but when you analyse them in detail, they really are just silly sound bites. I can't believe i'm even having to reply to this but...
A) Cars are not made as weapons. You can't stop the sale of cars because the legitimate uses and necessity of motorvehicles, in their native form, to the correct functioning of our entire society, utterly, grossly, outweigh the drawbacks of people using them as a weapon. It's a bit like questioning why we haven't banned knives in order to combat knife crime - it's the exact same principle. If these ramraid incidents became such a big problem that there were 14,000 killed a year from them and 29,000 injured (as there was in the USA in 2017), and we *could* get rid of cars and there be little to no impact on people's lives, then sure go for it. But you obviously knew the answer to this question, you were being obtuse.
B) If I could buy a some plastic explosive from my local Wal-Mart, for a couple of hundred dollars - perhaps people would blame the fact that I could by a chunk of C4 alongside my groceries.
C) People blame how easy it is to get hold of the gun, in combination with how deadly that gun could be if someone wanted to go postal. And there are a lot of crazy people who are waiting to. A gun does has legitimate uses (police, armed forces, hunting), but the vast majority of people will own a gun either because they like guns or because they need it for "self defence" because they're worried about the amount of gun violence in their city. Gun violence which is so prevalent because....you guessed it, too many people have access to firearms who have no legitimate use for them.
