Either through ignorance or conspiracy.Ironcially it was the BNP who stopped the upcoming invasion of Syria.
http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/did-nick-griffin-mep-really-stop-britain-bombing-syria-0
They are not classed as muslims by sunni either or alawite.And that is the view of extreme muslims that all others are non muslim.Where do you think this view came from then? It came from those who studied Islam the most, the scholars and grand imam's.
And to be honest im not sure what to make of muslims who are not extremist.Because the root belief is still the book and the book contains filfth and evil.So are they non muslims? Well considering the quran is so complicated it needs a scholar, and it was the scholars who declared the shia and alawites as non muslims then yes they are i guess non muslims.
You can argue until your blue in the face,call me a bigot or a racist but not once have i told lies in this thread.What i have said about Islam is all available on youtube if you search for it.As are the scholars and thier views on Islam in the west and those that live without sharia.I guess you lot all know more about Islam than the scholars who spent thier lives researching it?
Dont make me laugh
Do you understand how our government works ? The BNP have no MP's therefore they could not vote for invasion or otherwise - now who's having a laugh
The oppressive regimes are basically puppet dictators placed in power/supported by western governments / USA so as they can basically steal the countries oil and resources while greasing the palms of these horrific dictators.
No personal attacks, no swearing.
Gilly
Missed what he wrote but I can guess if he's been suspended
It was nothing too extreme (lol) but he has previous for such behavior.
To be fair, evidence exists to support that theory (notably released records of previous interventions & coups abroad which the west has admitted involvement in for those very reasons stated above).Is this just the counter-conspiracy theory to Rofflay's belief?
To be fair, evidence exists to support that theory (notably released records of previous interventions & coups abroad which the west has admitted involvement in for those very reasons stated above).
Wake up sheeple! Gilly is trying to silence the truth![]()
![]()
Most certainly, backing from the east or west many of these factions will have.There may be some evidence and there may even be substance to the claims, that I don't deny. Having said that, unless I'm mistaken there are also reports and evidence to the contrary. That the rebels and up-risers have also had western backing.
All wars tend to be over land & resources, political, military influence or self-defence.The CT I was referring to was 'The West' as a unit backing the oppressive regimes in power in order to beat the people down and sell us their resources on the cheap.
It's all about nuking anybody who dares oppose you in Civ5.I've played civ v brave new world. It's all about trade routes.
I've yet to hear of a war done for any ethical reasons & self-defence doesn't apply to our recent interventions.
Falklands, intervention in Bosnia, intervention in Kosovo, Sierra Leone...
What i have said about Islam is all available on youtube if you search for it.