We should look at this as those whore are disadvantaged due to their financial status not the colour of their skin.
Tory MP says people using term ‘white privilege’ should be reported to the Home Office as extremists
- Thread starter silvagti
- Start date
We should look at this as those whore are disadvantaged due to their financial status not the colour of their skin.
It's a reasonable question so not sure why you are dodging.
Do you see the same things going on today?
Soldato
Well, @robfosters is about the same age as me, but says he's never seen any racism other than BNP types.
I, on the other hand, witnessed it in two different workplaces, coming from the business owners themselves, in a way that has real effects beyond the trauma of direct racism: we're talking career opportunity.
So whether I've seen any racism in the workplace in the 13 years since I saw CV filtering going on (and 10 years since I left the ********* running small practice accounting businesses behind) isn't a very reliable measure on anything.
Man of Honour
The problem you have is that absence of seeing it doesn't mean it's gone away. It may be unsaid or even unconscious, which is why having names removed from CVs during sifting or blind interviews shows different results from sifting and interviewing with full names.
Soldato
I've also seen lots of CV filtering happen before my very eyes (early to mid 2000's), especially on names, but also age, sex etc..
However it was not on the colour of their skin it was literally on anyone 'foreign', and at that time more often than not aimed at white eastern Europeans.
And this is the problem, white privilege is a moronic concept that addresses nothing and seems to have been coined by idiots for idiots, and that goes for all identity politics...
There are issues as we all agree, however if you focus on individual equality then it fixes it for everyone as by far does the most good in getting towards true equality of opportunity.
The funniest was being told that I'd have to lose weight to progress within a business because the business owner hated 'fatties'..
However it was not on the colour of their skin it was literally on anyone 'foreign', and at that time more often than not aimed at white eastern Europeans.
And this is the problem, white privilege is a moronic concept that addresses nothing and seems to have been coined by idiots for idiots, and that goes for all identity politics...
There are issues as we all agree, however if you focus on individual equality then it fixes it for everyone as by far does the most good in getting towards true equality of opportunity.
The funniest was being told that I'd have to lose weight to progress within a business because the business owner hated 'fatties'..
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 3,525
Thanks for the response.
I can't recall seeing anything similar to that when I have recruited. It would have annoyed me, so I am sure I would remember that.
I like to think I would have not put up with it if I'd seen it, but it's easy to say that.
Personally, I think white privilege is an unhelpfully polarising term. It's just annoying.
Agreed, I wasn't trying to suggest the problem has gone away but from experience, I'd say it has become very less prevalent and very much unacceptable. Now the recent trend in white bashing, identity politics seems to be undoing the progress we as a society in the UK have made.
I still think that may be a very small minority of people.
Which is a positive move to exclude a very small minority of people in the recruitment process.
It's not serious, he's saying something ridiculous to highlight an issue into the limelight. Just like that Labour MP that was asking for a curfew for all men after 7pm, it was obvious that she wasn't being serious and was saying it to get headlines in papers.
And it's worked, we're all now here talking about it and trending on twitter for a few days.
There have been numerous studies done on this. Send out identical CVs, some with "western" names, some with "foreign" names. The ones with western names will get more call-backs. If you don't believe it, you can test it yourself.
The same for me, on top of that, i had the same teachers as black people, same lessons as black people, same books as black people. But i took advantage of the situation and paid attention in class. In contrast, all the black males in my class decided to just mess around. I even made friends with one of them and desperately tried to encourage him to study, and I thought i was making progress with him until he blew me off and prefer to mess around with his mates. Interestingly, all the black females in my class did study and made something of themselves.
So it wasn't even wholly a race thing, there's just an attitude problem with black males and then they blame everyone else but themselves later down the line.
Man of Honour
What makes you think that unconsciously filtering out people is only applicable to a really small minority of people? That's not rhetorical; do you know or understand how you've formed that opinion?
Soldato
Interesting. Why do you think the colour of their skin gave them such a bad attitude?
Recent example of such a study: New CSI research reveals high levels of job discrimination faced by ethnic minorities in Britain – CSI Nuffield (ox.ac.uk)
Between November 2016 and December 2017 the group sent out 3200 CVs, leaving all the details the same but changing the names. The average call-back rate for the CVs with western names was about 24%. The average callback rate for CVs wtih Pakistani names was about 14%, for Nigerian names it was 13%.
Between November 2016 and December 2017 the group sent out 3200 CVs, leaving all the details the same but changing the names. The average call-back rate for the CVs with western names was about 24%. The average callback rate for CVs wtih Pakistani names was about 14%, for Nigerian names it was 13%.
Man of Honour
Do you believe either their race or gender is the cause of this 'bad attitude'?
Like most people posting here, I have to base it on my own experiences. My current role in IT has seen me work alongside many people from differing cultures and racial backgrounds. If the problem was as widespread as some people say, that would be reflected in my experience but it is not.
Judging by his post, female black individuals seem to do well - so maybe he just hates males?
Soldato
The main issue is that privilege exists in all aspects of life and balancing the scale for comparison of person A to person B is difficult. Generalising one demographic over another is divisive when collective lived experience doesn't really exist, we are all individuals with a myriad of challenges and experiences which have affected us. Being aware of these types of challenges is important for all of us, but weighing one against the other is not easy, nor is it necessarily right to try.
Man of Honour
I'm seeing a failure of critical thinking here and it's rife with loads of people in this thread: "I don't see it or its not obvious to me, therefore it doesn't exist". This is simply a fallacy.
I bet if you did the same thing with only english names the more common poor sounding people or the people who went to crap schools get binned.
wouldn't surprise me if your post code matters too.
It's not about race it's about the perception that some people are better than others because their family isn't poor