You can get a 3 or 4 bedroom house for that price in some parts of the country.
But it's not the case for most of the country:
http://visual.ons.gov.uk/house-prices-in-your-area/
https://www.primelocation.com/heatmaps/
You can get a 3 or 4 bedroom house for that price in some parts of the country.
There's a good reason for that.
But surely the council or TMO has an idea of who was registered here (Saying that, a lot of councils are absolute dog ***** at keeping records).
Sub-letting is something different and a major issue. But bear in mind that many many people sub-letting are UK or EU citizens and not illegals, often in employment, often without anywhere else to stay. There's a housing crisis, it's happening everywhere. So rather than demonising the sub-letters, let's address the wider housing problem, which is huge right across the country, particularly in London.
yes they will have the official tenants, but not illegal sub tenants, that is the point!
Seems the owners of the tower block have a very Cavalier attitude to who is living there
and how the official owners / renters run their activities. Multiply the issues becoming
apparent here by all the similar properties in the UK and the lack of control of our borders
and lack of proper identification of those living here and the problem is probably massive.
Anyone guilty of illegally sub letting flats in the tower should be traced and brought fully to
justice. As well as bringing out all the bleeding hearts and those using any incident, however
disconnected, to trying to bring down the government, it has also opened people's eyes to
how out of control the housing market is in regard to illegal renting. As well as checking fire
risks in rented accommodation the authorities should do a full inventory of those living in them
and their rights to be here in the first place. Another can of worms is opening.
Yep, exactly. But let's be clear that "illegal sub tenant" is not the same as "illegal immigrant" although of course in some cases there may be some crossover.
The political grandstanding around this disaster is grim. Why do we see the 'Socialist Workers Party' placards and people wearing 'Momentum' t-shirts at marches allegedly revolving around this tower block?
Remember guys, the most important thing to take from this is to "send them back"!!!
Funny how so many always assume it is white people complaining about immigrants. Are you not aware of immigrants settled in complaining about new immigrants?
Well they seem to have perhaps been caused by: scummy contractor taking short cuts in order to increase profits. (allegedly)
Which is?
I'm pretty sure Chris isn't one of those.![]()
Perhaps but that doesn't deny it doesn't happen.
With the reaction from the likes of Momentum, you would have thought that no high-rise tower blocks in Labour wards have the same cladding ............ As there are allegedly 600 other buildings with the same issue, I'd bet there are yet, apparently its all 'the Tories' fault.
No one want's to live there, because it's probably ****.
So you have lost everything. Your passport, driving licence, clothes, furniture, bank cards and you get given a cheque which you then need to wit five days to clear. Great
Good to see the DE is sticking to the agenda that everything must be the EU's fault
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/81...ing-latest-updates-european-union-regulations
A government-supported initiative to cut red tape considered a push to dismantle EU regulations on the fire safety of cladding and other construction materials in the weeks before the Grenfell Tower fire.
A document obtained by Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, and seen by the Guardian, singled out EU regulation which covers the safety and efficacy of construction materials as among the first to target for dismantling. Among the products covered in the EU regulation is cladding.
The document was produced on 10 May for the Red Tape Initiative, a body supported by the government, to “seize the opportunities” of Brexit to cut red tape. Entitled The EU’s Impact on the UK Housing and Construction Industry, it picks out the Construction Products Regulation (EU 305/2011) as “red tape folly” which is “expensive and burdensome for small businesses”.