FFS, you are forcing me to open up this link. Can you not summary post please.
0_o
FFS, you are forcing me to open up this link. Can you not summary post please.
Not sure if serious.
Thanks for the contribution, is Tefal having a day off?
Thanks for the contribution, is Tefal having a day off?
No, just that people should vote more, all you ever hear is "this council is ****", "that council is atrocious" from people... yet the turnout is abysmal.
Sorry I think tos is after your job
Are we in the territory of blaming the dead for this fire?
Sorry not read all the comments since I was here last but considering the apparent cause in this instance the quote looks shameful!
how do you know the people dumping things in fire escape routes died?
they might have got out fine while others died due to their actions.
I wouldn't say I'm worked up, I enjoy highlighting the idiocy of bias!
you were just ranting, like I said if you're not interested in discussion then don't bother quoting me, thanks![]()
Quoted you and still not interested in the level of discussion where I ask a question and you say, whatcha talking about willis!
not really an excuse for dumping it in the stairwell or other communal areas... also I doubt very much it was disabled residents dumping a fridge, mattress etc... how did they get the replacement fridge/mattress into their flat? Why couldn't they have waited?
perhaps you should read the thread/comments in context then, don't quote me and call comments 'shameful' if you're too lazy to do that
What exactly do you want? Are you just going to repeated quote me and waste time as you've done in a bunch of other threads?
If you have nothing to say, why post the above, your time is only wasted because you can't answer a direct question!
You posted rather a lot, including a lot of ranting. If you have a question you could have just asked a question.
In answer to your question though: No. The post you quoted re: the rubbish had nothing to do with blaming the dead for this fire.
So basically all of your input has been about irrelevancies to do with the behaviour of residents half of whom are likely dead?You admitted yourself that you didn't read all the comments, perhaps if you had then you'd not be in this positions - anyway... thanks for now finally engaging in more constructive dialogue - here are the answers to your further questions in order:
No
No, I stated that that is what the council claimed
Major factor? No, the cladding probably was. It probably wasn't helpful though.
The reason for mentioning the furniture wasn't in relation to the cause of the fire but in relation to the concerns re: installing sprinklers, fire hoses etc.. as mentioned by someone else there is potential for these to be abused thus that could have been a factor in the decision not to install them - when some residents treat the communal areas like the below then it seems pretty clear that there are people living there who don't really care much about their surroundings, community etc... Of course it is apparently the council's fault for not clearing it quickly, allowing it to be there..
![]()
So basically all of your input has been about irrelevancies to do with the behaviour of residents half of whom are likely dead?
No again... people have discussed a range of issues in this thread. If you think the things being discussed aren't relevant then why engage?