If you're investing in Vanguard trackers (S+S Isa), is the Vanguard platform cheaper than H&L?
I'm with H&L at the moment. When I opened it years ago, iirc the fees were pretty negligible unless you had 10's of thousands in. Is that still the case? If so, any idea where the switchover point is?
I can't see how not buying from Vanguard directly be cheaper than using a 3rd party to make the transaction.
from what I've seen of H&L as my nephew in law uses them, they are a bit of a rip off in fees.. some say the costs are covered if you trade enough as you get better prices but most of my funds just go into vanguard and I have a small amount into 212 as I think I'm the wolf of wallstreet... lol
H&L is cheaper if you stick to ETF's not funds, it depends how many trades you make.
Essentially, on H&L within an ISA, the fee is capped at £10,000 balance, which is exactly £45 per year.
This is equivalent to holding £30,000 on vanguard.
You then need to calculate trading costs on top of this.
If we round H&L's trading cost to £12, the cost of 1 trade is equal to holding £8000 on vanguard (for 1 year)
Therefore, assuming you buy VWRL within an ISA on H&L exactly 4 times per year, this is equivalent to £62,000 on vanguard
If you buy it monthly, then this is equivalent to £126,000 on vanguard
If you are @ H&L you can trade a ETF/Fund which are the same thing, so buy vanguard fund, then, once you reach £10k in that fund, you sell it, and purchase the equivalent ETF.
The cost to hold that 10k for another year, will be £45 exactly, and the trade is £11.95, so you'll save £33 on that trade for the 1 year period.
You then purchase the fund monthly or whatever, and once again u reach £10k, or close ish, you repeat the process.
This allows you to do 1 trade per year, while not doing 1 trade, bringing it down to £38,000 per year equivalent. (well assuming you save 10k per year).